Exercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade Motricidade Humana, Universidade Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, 1499-002, Cruz-Quebrada, Portugal.
CIDEFES-Universidade Lusófona, 1749-024, Lisbon, Portugal.
Eur J Nutr. 2022 Apr;61(3):1405-1416. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02742-6. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
The aim of this study was (1) to assess AT through 13 different mathematical approaches and to compare their results; and (2) to understand if AT occurs after moderate WL.
Ninety-four participants [mean (SD); BMI, 31.1 (4.3) kg/m; age, 43.0 (9.4) years; 34% females] underwent a 1-year lifestyle intervention (clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03031951) and were randomized to intervention (IG, n = 49) or control groups (CG, n = 45), and all measurements were made at baseline and after 4 months. Fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and REE by indirect calorimetry. AT was assessed through 13 different approaches, varying in how REE was predicted and/or how AT was assessed.
IG underwent a mean negative energy balance (EB) of 270 (289) kcal/day, p < 0.001), resulting in a WL of - 4.8 (4.9)% and an FM loss of - 11.3 (10.8)%. Regardless of approach, AT occurred in the IG, ranging from ~ - 65 to ~ - 230 kcal/day and three approaches showed significant AT in the CG.
Regardless of approach, AT occurred after moderate WL in the IG. AT assessment should be standardized and comparisons among studies with different methodologies to assess AT must be avoided.
本研究旨在(1)通过 13 种不同的数学方法评估 AT,并比较其结果;(2)了解中度 WL 后是否会发生 AT。
94 名参与者(平均(标准差);BMI,31.1(4.3)kg/m;年龄,43.0(9.4)岁;女性占 34%)接受了为期 1 年的生活方式干预(临床试验.gov ID:NCT03031951),并随机分为干预组(IG,n=49)或对照组(CG,n=45),所有测量均在基线和 4 个月后进行。通过双能 X 射线吸收法测量脂肪量(FM)和去脂量(FFM),通过间接热量法测量静息能量消耗(REE)。通过 13 种不同的方法评估 AT,这些方法在预测 REE 和/或评估 AT 的方式上有所不同。
IG 经历了平均 270(289)千卡/天的负能量平衡(EB),p<0.001),导致体重减轻-4.8(4.9)%和 FM 减少-11.3(10.8)%。无论采用哪种方法,IG 均发生 AT,范围为--65 至--230 千卡/天,3 种方法在 CG 中显示出明显的 AT。
无论采用哪种方法,IG 在中度 WL 后均发生 AT。AT 评估应标准化,避免使用不同方法学评估 AT 的研究之间进行比较。