• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达芬奇 Xi 与达芬奇 Si 手术系统行根治性前列腺切除术的比较。

A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2021 Nov 30;21(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01406-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-021-01406-w
PMID:34847882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8638093/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the perioperative and short-term efficacy and cost of the da Vinci Xi and da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 175 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si or Xi surgical systems in our hospital from June 2019 to June 2020. Of the 175 patients, 82 underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Xi surgery system, and 93 patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si surgical system. The perioperative outcomes, short-term efficacy and costs were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The anesthesia time, operation time, docking time, indwelling catheter time and postoperative bed rest time in the Xi group were shorter than those in the Si group (respectively, 268.8 min vs. 219.3 min, P = 0.001; 228.2 min vs. 259.6 min, P < 0.001; 7.4 min vs. 12.7 min, P < 0.001; 8.6 d vs. 9.7 d, P = 0.036; 2.2 d vs. 2.6 d, P = 0.002). However, the total cost of hospitalization and the cost of intraoperative consumables in the Xi group were higher than those in the Si group (84,740.7 vs. 76,739.1 ¥, P = 0.003; 13,199.4 vs. 10,823.0 ¥, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the cost of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is higher, compared with the Si system, the Xi system has better perioperative outcomes and can provide similar short-term efficacy and oncology outcomes.

摘要

背景

比较达芬奇 Xi 系统和达芬奇 Si 系统行根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期和短期疗效及成本。

方法

回顾性分析 2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 6 月我院 175 例行达芬奇 Si 或 Xi 系统机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术患者的临床资料,其中 82 例行达芬奇 Xi 手术系统机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术,93 例行达芬奇 Si 手术系统机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术。比较两组患者的围手术期指标、短期疗效和成本。

结果

Xi 组患者的麻醉时间、手术时间、对接时间、留置导尿管时间和术后卧床时间均短于 Si 组(分别为 268.8 min 比 219.3 min,P=0.001;228.2 min 比 259.6 min,P<0.001;7.4 min 比 12.7 min,P<0.001;8.6 d 比 9.7 d,P=0.036;2.2 d 比 2.6 d,P=0.002)。然而,Xi 组患者的总住院费用和术中耗材费用均高于 Si 组(84740.7 比 76739.1 元,P=0.003;13199.4 比 10823.0 元,P=0.019)。

结论

虽然达芬奇 Xi 系统的手术费用较高,但与 Si 系统相比,Xi 系统具有更好的围手术期效果,且能提供相似的短期疗效和肿瘤学结局。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy.达芬奇 Xi 与达芬奇 Si 手术系统行根治性前列腺切除术的比较。
BMC Surg. 2021 Nov 30;21(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01406-w.
2
Comparing the Approach to Radical Prostatectomy Using the Multiport da Vinci Xi and da Vinci SP Robots: A Propensity Score Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes.比较使用多端口达芬奇 Xi 和 da Vinci SP 机器人进行根治性前列腺切除术的方法:围手术期结局的倾向评分分析。
Eur Urol. 2021 Mar;79(3):393-404. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.042. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
3
Transitioning from Da Vinci Si to Xi: assessing surgical outcomes at a high-volume robotic center.从达芬奇 Si 到 Xi:在高容量机器人中心评估手术结果。
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3737-3744. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04665-9. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
4
Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy using da Vinci Xi vs. Si: are there differences?达芬奇 Xi 与 Si 机器人辅助肾上腺切除术:有区别吗?
J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):349-355. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00995-2. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
5
A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. the da Vinci Si Surgical System for Roux-En-Y gastric bypass.达芬奇 Xi 与达芬奇 Si 手术系统在 Roux-En-Y 胃旁路手术中的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Aug;404(5):615-620. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01803-z. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
6
Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: case-matched comparison of short-term surgical and functional outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and Si.达芬奇 Xi 和 Si 机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:短期手术和功能结局的病例匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):589-600. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5708-5. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
7
Radical prostatectomy technique in the robotic evolution: from da Vinci standard to single port-a single surgeon pathway.机器人技术演进中的根治性前列腺切除术技术:从达芬奇标准到单端口-单外科医生途径。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):21-27. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01194-8. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
8
Patterns-of-care and health economic analysis of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Australian public health system.澳大利亚公共卫生系统中机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的护理模式与健康经济分析。
BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):930-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13317. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
9
Multiquadrant robotic colorectal surgery: the da Vinci Xi vs Si comparison.多象限机器人结直肠手术:达芬奇Xi系统与Si系统对比
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):67-74. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0689-x. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
10
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助微创手术在妇科和泌尿外科肿瘤学中的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of robotic single site system in pediatric surgery: a systematic review.机器人单部位系统在小儿外科手术中的应用:一项系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 1;19(1):192. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02276-7.
2
Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness between the Sentire® and da Vinci® systems in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.Sentire®系统与da Vinci®系统在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的临床结果及成本效益
Int Braz J Urol. 2025 Jul-Aug;51(4). doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0706.
3
Economic evaluations of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and the factors affecting its cost-effectiveness: a systematic review.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的经济学评价及其影响成本效益的因素:系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Oct 14;18(1):370. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02125-z.
4
Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: efficiency of robotic assistance compared to standard laparoscopy.经阴道机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术与标准腹腔镜手术的疗效比较。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 10;18(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01799-1.
5
Single-port and multiport robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis.单孔与多孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:一项荟萃分析。
Prostate Int. 2023 Dec;11(4):187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
6
Learning curves of resection and reconstruction procedures in robotic-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy by a single surgeon: a retrospective cohort study of 160 consecutive cases.单一外科医生实施机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术的切除与重建手术学习曲线:对160例连续病例的回顾性队列研究
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023 Jul 26;11:goad042. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goad042. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Robotic Prostatectomy: Past, Present, and Future.保留Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术:过去、现在和未来。
Urol Clin North Am. 2021 Feb;48(1):11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
The Efficiency and Safety of Transperitoneal versus Extraperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Single Center Experience with 1-year Follow-up.经腹腔与经腹膜外途径机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌的疗效和安全性:单中心 1 年随访经验。
Urol J. 2020 Jul 21;17(5):480-485. doi: 10.22037/uj.v16i7.5475.
3
Experience of one single surgeon with the first 500 robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy cases in mainland China.中国大陆一位外科医生的前500例机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术经验。
Asian J Urol. 2020 Apr;7(2):170-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.12.004. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
In experienced hands, does the robotic platform impact operative efficiency? Comparison of the da Vinci Si versus Xi robot in colorectal surgery.在经验丰富的医生手中,机器人平台会影响手术效率吗?达芬奇Si机器人与Xi机器人在结直肠癌手术中的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):789-792. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01055-w. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
From Da Vinci Si to Da Vinci Xi: realistic times in draping and docking the robot.从达芬奇Si到达芬奇Xi:机器人铺单与对接的实际操作时代
J Robot Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):835-839. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01057-8. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
7
Extraperitoneal versus Transperitoneal Single Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes.腹膜外与经腹腔单孔机器人根治性前列腺切除术:围手术期结局的比较分析。
J Urol. 2020 Jun;203(6):1135-1140. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000700. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
8
Use of Surgery for Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence.前列腺切除术治疗尿失禁的应用。
J Urol. 2020 Apr;203(4):786-791. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000618. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
9
Comparison of surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.前列腺癌患者机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的手术、肿瘤学及功能结局比较
Turk J Urol. 2019 Nov 1;45(6):410-417. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.48457. Print 2019 Nov.
10
Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy using da Vinci Xi vs. Si: are there differences?达芬奇 Xi 与 Si 机器人辅助肾上腺切除术:有区别吗?
J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):349-355. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00995-2. Epub 2019 Jul 4.