Suppr超能文献

超声检查是评估孕期附件包块的可靠且可重复的方法吗?一项系统评价。

Is Ultrasound a Reliable and Reproducible Method for Assessing Adnexal Masses in Pregnancy? A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Gaughran Jonathan E, Naji Osama, Al Sabbagh Mohammed Q, Sayasneh Ahmad

机构信息

Women's Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.

Gynaecology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Oct 27;13(10):e19079. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19079. eCollection 2021 Oct.

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to systematicallyreview the current evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in assessing adnexal masses in pregnancy. The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were searched for all types of clinical studies that utilised ultrasound for the diagnosis of adnexal masses in pregnancy. Only studies that used outcome measures of either histological diagnosis or significant regression of the adnexal mass on imaging follow-up were included. The quality of each study was assessed for risk of bias. The diagnostic performance of ultrasound in each study type was calculated, along with the pooled diagnostic performance of ultrasound in differentiating benign from malignant masses. The initial search yielded 4,915 articles, of which 2,547 qualified for abstract screening. A total of 83 articles were included in this review, including one prospective cohort study, six retrospective observational studies, seven case series, and 69 case reports. In the included studies, the total number of adnexal masses was 559. The mean patient age was 29.2 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.7-29.7), with a mean gestational age at diagnosis of 13.8 weeks (95% CI: 13.2-14.4). The mean quality assessment score was 75%. The International Ovarian Tumour Analysis Simple Rules were used in two articles, whereas subjective impression was used in the remaining 81 articles. The most frequently diagnosed mass was a simple or physiological cyst (35%). The prevalence of malignancy in the entire sample was 46/559 (8%; 95% CI: 34-61%). The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of ultrasound in detecting ovarian malignancy were 64% (95% CI: 30-88%), 88% (95% CI: 64-97%), 5.6 (95% CI: 1.2-25.4), and 0.4 (95% CI: 0.15-1), respectively. In conclusion, currently, there is a lack of high-quality prospective studies to guide the management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. Ultrasound appears to have an adequate accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant masses; however, more research is required to assess the role of ultrasound models, rules, and subjective assessment in pregnancy compared to non-pregnant women.

摘要

在本研究中,我们旨在系统回顾目前关于超声评估妊娠附件包块诊断准确性的证据。我们检索了Cochrane对照试验注册库、PubMed和EMBASE数据库,查找所有利用超声诊断妊娠附件包块的各类临床研究。仅纳入那些将组织学诊断或附件包块在影像随访中显著缩小作为结局指标的研究。评估了每项研究的质量以确定偏倚风险。计算了每种研究类型中超声的诊断性能,以及超声鉴别良性与恶性包块的合并诊断性能。初步检索得到4915篇文章,其中2547篇符合摘要筛选条件。本综述共纳入83篇文章,包括1篇前瞻性队列研究、6篇回顾性观察性研究、7篇病例系列研究和69篇病例报告。在纳入的研究中,附件包块总数为559个。患者平均年龄为29.2岁(95%置信区间[CI]:28.7 - 29.7),诊断时平均孕周为13.8周(95%CI:13.2 - 14.4)。平均质量评估得分为75%。两篇文章使用了国际卵巢肿瘤分析简单规则,其余81篇文章使用的是主观印象。最常诊断出的包块是单纯性或生理性囊肿(35%)。整个样本中恶性肿瘤的患病率为46/559(8%;95%CI:34 - 61%)。超声检测卵巢恶性肿瘤的总体合并敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比和阴性似然比分别为64%(95%CI:30 - 88%)、88%(95%CI:64 - 97%)、5.6(95%CI:1.2 - 25.4)和0.4(95%CI:0.15 - 1)。总之,目前缺乏高质量的前瞻性研究来指导妊娠附件包块的管理。超声在鉴别良性与恶性包块方面似乎具有足够的准确性;然而,与非妊娠女性相比,还需要更多研究来评估超声模型、规则和主观评估在妊娠中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验