• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人与医护专业人员如何远程共同设计药物治疗计划原型以促进患者安全:案例研究

How Older Persons and Health Care Professionals Co-designed a Medication Plan Prototype Remotely to Promote Patient Safety: Case Study.

作者信息

Holmqvist Malin, Ros Axel, Lindenfalk Bertil, Thor Johan, Johansson Linda

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Healthcare, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden.

School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.

出版信息

JMIR Aging. 2023 Apr 7;6:e41950. doi: 10.2196/41950.

DOI:10.2196/41950
PMID:37027205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10131987/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Harm from medications is a major patient safety challenge. Most adverse drug events arise when a medication is prescribed or reevaluated. Therefore, interventions in this area may improve patient safety. A medication plan, that is, a plan for continued treatment with medications, may support patient safety. Participation of patients in the design of health care products or services may improve patient safety. Co-design, as in the Double Diamond framework from the Design Council, England, can emphasize patient involvement. As the COVID-19 pandemic brought restrictions to face-to-face co-design approaches, interest in remote approaches increased. However, it is uncertain how best to perform remote co-design. Therefore, we explored a remote approach, which brought together older persons and health care professionals to co-design a medication plan prototype in the electronic health record, aiming to support patient safety.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe how remote co-design was applied to create a medication plan prototype and to explore participants' experiences with this approach.

METHODS

Within a case study design, we explored the experiences of a remote co-design initiative with 14 participants in a regional health care system in southern Sweden. Using descriptive statistics, quantitative data from questionnaires and web-based workshop timestamps were analyzed. A thematic analysis of the qualitative data gathered from workshops, interviews, and free-text responses to the survey questions was performed. Qualitative and quantitative data were compared side by side in the discussion.

RESULTS

The analysis of the questionnaires revealed that the participants rated the experiences of the co-design initiative very high. In addition, the balance between how much involved persons expressed their wishes and were listened to was considered very good. Marked timestamps from audio recordings showed that the workshops proceeded according to the plan. The thematic analysis yielded the following main themes: Everyone's perspective matters, Learning by sharing, and Mastering a digital space. The themes encompassed what helped to establish a permissive environment that allowed the participants to be involved and share viewpoints. There was a dynamic process of learning and understanding, realizing that despite different backgrounds, there was consensus about the requirements for a medication plan. The remote co-design process seemed appealing, by balancing opportunities and challenges and building an inviting, creative, and tolerant environment.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants experienced that the remote co-design initiative was inclusive of their perspectives and facilitated learning by sharing experiences. The Double Diamond framework was applicable in a digital context and supported the co-design process of the medication plan prototype. Remote co-design is still novel, but with attentiveness to power relations between all involved, this approach may increase opportunities for older persons and health care professionals to collaboratively design products or services that can improve patient safety.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b004/10131987/7f07f48a5fed/aging_v6i1e41950_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b004/10131987/2780107e8d7e/aging_v6i1e41950_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b004/10131987/7f07f48a5fed/aging_v6i1e41950_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b004/10131987/2780107e8d7e/aging_v6i1e41950_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b004/10131987/7f07f48a5fed/aging_v6i1e41950_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

药物造成的伤害是患者安全面临的一项重大挑战。大多数药物不良事件发生在开处方或重新评估药物时。因此,该领域的干预措施可能会提高患者安全性。药物治疗计划,即持续药物治疗的计划,可能有助于患者安全。患者参与医疗保健产品或服务的设计可能会提高患者安全性。如英国设计委员会的双钻石框架中的协同设计,可以强调患者的参与。由于新冠疫情给面对面的协同设计方法带来了限制,人们对远程方法的兴趣增加。然而,尚不确定如何最好地进行远程协同设计。因此,我们探索了一种远程方法,该方法将老年人和医疗保健专业人员聚集在一起,共同设计电子健康记录中的药物治疗计划原型,旨在提高患者安全性。

目的

本研究旨在描述如何应用远程协同设计来创建药物治疗计划原型,并探索参与者对这种方法的体验。

方法

在一项案例研究设计中,我们探索了瑞典南部一个区域医疗保健系统中14名参与者的远程协同设计倡议的经验。使用描述性统计方法,分析了问卷和基于网络的研讨会时间戳中的定量数据。对从研讨会、访谈以及对调查问卷问题的自由文本回复中收集的定性数据进行了主题分析。在讨论中对定性和定量数据进行了并列比较。

结果

对问卷的分析表明,参与者对协同设计倡议的体验评价很高。此外,参与者表达愿望和被倾听的程度之间的平衡被认为非常好。音频记录中的明显时间戳显示研讨会按计划进行。主题分析产生了以下主要主题:每个人的观点都很重要、通过分享学习、掌握数字空间。这些主题涵盖了有助于营造一个宽松环境的因素,使参与者能够参与并分享观点。存在一个学习和理解的动态过程,意识到尽管背景不同,但对于药物治疗计划的要求存在共识。远程协同设计过程似乎很有吸引力,它平衡了机会和挑战,并营造了一个吸引人、富有创造性和宽容的环境。

结论

参与者体验到远程协同设计倡议包含了他们的观点,并通过分享经验促进了学习。双钻石框架适用于数字环境,并支持药物治疗计划原型的协同设计过程。远程协同设计仍然很新颖,但关注所有参与者之间的权力关系,这种方法可能会增加老年人和医疗保健专业人员合作设计可提高患者安全性的产品或服务的机会。

相似文献

1
How Older Persons and Health Care Professionals Co-designed a Medication Plan Prototype Remotely to Promote Patient Safety: Case Study.老年人与医护专业人员如何远程共同设计药物治疗计划原型以促进患者安全:案例研究
JMIR Aging. 2023 Apr 7;6:e41950. doi: 10.2196/41950.
2
Older Persons' and Health Care Professionals' Design Choices When Co-Designing a Medication Plan Aiming to Promote Patient Safety: Case Study.老年人与医疗保健专业人员在共同设计旨在促进患者安全的用药计划时的设计选择:案例研究
JMIR Aging. 2023 Oct 5;6:e49154. doi: 10.2196/49154.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Older persons' experiences regarding evaluation of their medication treatment-An interview study in Sweden.老年人对药物治疗评估的体验——瑞典的一项访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2019 Dec;22(6):1294-1303. doi: 10.1111/hex.12967. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
6
Digital participatory workshops with patients and health professionals to develop an intervention for the management of polypharmacy: results from a mixed-methods evaluation and methodological conclusions.与患者和医疗专业人员开展数字参与式研讨会以制定多药治疗管理干预措施:混合方法评估结果及方法学结论
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Sep 16;8(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00387-1.
7
Development of a Digital Tool for People With a Long-Term Condition Using Stroke as a Case Example: Participatory Design Approach.以中风为例,为患有长期疾病的人群开发数字工具:参与式设计方法。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jun 3;9(2):e35478. doi: 10.2196/35478.
8
Remote working in public involvement: findings from a mixed methods study.公众参与中的远程工作:一项混合方法研究的结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 4;8(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00396-0.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Experiences of caregivers of community-dwelling older persons with moderate to advanced dementia in adapting the Namaste Care program: a qualitative descriptive study.社区中患有中度至重度痴呆症的居家老年人照料者采用合十礼护理项目的经历:一项质性描述性研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 12;8(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00401-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying a co-designed medication plan for safer medication treatment in older persons: a feasibility study.应用共同设计的药物治疗方案以实现老年人更安全的药物治疗:一项可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jul 3;11(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01661-1.
2
Examining Challenges to Co-Design Digital Health Interventions With End Users: Systematic Review.审视与终端用户共同设计数字健康干预措施所面临的挑战:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 14;27:e50178. doi: 10.2196/50178.
3
Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Codesign approaches involving older adults in the development of electronic healthcare tools: a systematic review.涉及老年人参与电子医疗工具开发的共同设计方法:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 6;12(7):e058390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058390.
2
Mapping definitions of co-production and co-design in health and social care: A systematic scoping review providing lessons for the future.绘制健康和社会关怀领域中共同生产和共同设计的定义:为未来提供经验教训的系统范围界定综述。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):902-913. doi: 10.1111/hex.13470. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
Quality as strategy, the evolution of co-production in the Region Jönköping health system, Sweden: a descriptive qualitative study.
消费者参与初级保健中药物安全干预或服务的设计和开发:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70092. doi: 10.1111/hex.70092.
4
Systematic review on the frequency and quality of reporting patient and public involvement in patient safety research.关于患者及公众参与患者安全研究报告的频率与质量的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11021-z.
5
Older Persons' and Health Care Professionals' Design Choices When Co-Designing a Medication Plan Aiming to Promote Patient Safety: Case Study.老年人与医疗保健专业人员在共同设计旨在促进患者安全的用药计划时的设计选择:案例研究
JMIR Aging. 2023 Oct 5;6:e49154. doi: 10.2196/49154.
质量即策略:瑞典约恩奥普市卫生系统中共同生产的演变——一项描述性定性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 29;33(Supplement_2):ii15-ii22. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab060.
4
Using the Double Diamond model to co-design a dementia caregivers telehealth peer support program.利用双钻石模型共同设计痴呆症照顾者远程医疗同伴支持计划。
J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Dec;27(10):667-673. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211048980.
5
Evaluation of older persons' medications: a critical incident technique study exploring healthcare professionals' experiences and actions.老年人用药评估:一项运用关键事件技术探究医疗保健专业人员经验与行为的研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 7;21(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06518-w.
6
Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study.共同设计干预措施以增加老年患者活动能力的挑战:一项定性研究。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Apr 9;35(9):140-162. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2020-0049.
7
Translating Co-Design from Face-to-Face to Online: An Australian Primary Producer Project Conducted during COVID-19.从面对面到在线的共同设计翻译:澳大利亚在 COVID-19 期间进行的一个主要生产者项目。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;18(8):4147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084147.
8
"Am I representative (of my age)? No, I'm not"-Attitudes to technologies and technology development differ but unite individuals across rather than within generations.“我是否具有代表性(代表我的年龄)?不,我没有”——对技术和技术发展的态度因人而异,而不是因代际而异,将个人联系在一起,而不是分裂他们。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0250425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250425. eCollection 2021.
9
Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews.探索患者和公众参与健康、社会关怀和患者安全的理论、障碍和促进因素:系统综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jan 20;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00644-3.
10
Facilitating co-production in public services: Empirical evidence from a co-design experience with family caregivers living in a remote and rural area.促进公共服务的共同生产:来自与生活在偏远农村地区的家庭照顾者共同设计经验的实证证据。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2021 Feb;34(1):21-35. doi: 10.1177/0951484820971452. Epub 2020 Nov 11.