Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0259000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259000. eCollection 2021.
The effectiveness of health education on adolescents has been questioned, along with a growing body of empirical studies documenting the absence of behavioral changes after the intervention. However, evidence on its impact on other crucial health domains, besides health practices, is lacking. We evaluated the causal effects of a school-based health education program on adolescents' multidimensional psychological health factors.
A cluster-randomized controlled trial.
We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial involving 140 lower secondary schools in Vietnam. After stratifying by district, schools were randomized 1:1 to either treatment or control groups. Students enrolled in the treatment schools received monthly stand-alone health education in five topics by school teachers at the class level, but control group students did not receive any intervention. The primary outcomes of the study were students' non-cognitive skills, life satisfaction, aspirations gap, and the Health-Related Quality of Life at five-month follow-up. We estimated the intention-to-treat effects with the panel fixed effects model using student panel data.
Of the 6,477 students enrolled at baseline, 2,958 (92%) treated and 2,967 (91%) control students completed the follow-up survey five months after baseline data collection from October to December 2018. Compared with controls, health education led to improved treatment school students' self-efficacy (p-value = 0.013), presumed life satisfaction five years from the present (p-value = 0.001), aspirations gap for a socially and mentally healthy future (p-value = 0.036), and the Health-Related Quality of Life (p-value = 0.036).
A school-based health education program enhanced students' non-cognitive skills, life satisfaction and aspirations gap, and the Health-Related Quality of Life significantly. This study proposes essential psychological factors that should be taken into account when evaluating the effectiveness of a health education program in resource-limited settings.
健康教育对青少年的有效性一直受到质疑,越来越多的实证研究也证明,干预后行为没有发生变化。然而,关于其对健康实践以外的其他关键健康领域的影响的证据却很少。我们评估了一项基于学校的健康教育计划对青少年多维心理健康因素的因果影响。
一项整群随机对照试验。
我们在越南进行了一项整群随机对照试验,涉及 140 所初中。在按区分层后,学校按 1:1 的比例随机分为治疗组和对照组。在治疗学校上学的学生由学校教师每月在五个主题上进行独立的健康教育,而对照组学生则不接受任何干预。该研究的主要结果是学生的非认知技能、生活满意度、愿望差距和五个月随访时的健康相关生活质量。我们使用学生面板数据的面板固定效应模型来估计意向治疗效果。
在基线时登记的 6477 名学生中,有 2958 名(92%)治疗组学生和 2967 名(91%)对照组学生完成了 2018 年 10 月至 12 月从基线数据收集后五个月的随访调查。与对照组相比,健康教育使接受治疗的学校学生的自我效能感提高(p 值=0.013),目前五年后的预期生活满意度提高(p 值=0.001),对社会和心理健康未来的愿望差距缩小(p 值=0.036),健康相关生活质量提高(p 值=0.036)。
一项基于学校的健康教育计划显著增强了学生的非认知技能、生活满意度和愿望差距,以及健康相关生活质量。本研究提出了在资源有限的环境中评估健康教育计划效果时应考虑的重要心理因素。