• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用工具包管理系统评价过程中的时间、资源和预期:案例报告。

Adopting a toolkit to manage time, resources, and expectations in the systematic review process: a case report.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):637-642. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1221.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2021.1221
PMID:34858095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8608198/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The proliferation of systematic reviews has impacted library operations and activities as librarians support, collaborate, and perform more tasks in the systematic review process. This case report describes a toolkit that librarians with extensive experience in supporting multiple review teams use to manage time, resources, and expectations in the systematic review process.

CASE PRESENTATION

The toolkit is a compilation of documents that we use to effectively communicate with and help review teams understand and navigate each stage of the systematic review process. Elements included in the toolkit and discussed in this case report are intake forms, communication templates and memoranda, a process flow diagram, library guides on tools for retrieval and data appraisal, and established standards for guidance during the write-up stage. We describe the use of the toolkit for both education and project management, with a focus on its use in helping manage team time, resources, and expectations.

DISCUSSION

The systematic review toolkit helps librarians connect systematic review steps and tasks to actionable items. The content facilitates and supports discussion and learning by both librarians and team members. This toolkit helps librarians share important information and resources for each stage of the process.

摘要

背景

系统评价的大量涌现已经影响了图书馆的运营和活动,因为图书馆员在系统评价过程中支持、协作并执行更多的任务。本案例报告描述了一套工具包,经验丰富的图书馆员在支持多个评审团队时使用该工具包来管理时间、资源和期望。

案例介绍

该工具包是我们用来与评审团队进行有效沟通以及帮助他们理解和驾驭系统评价过程各个阶段的文件汇编。本案例报告中讨论的工具包的组成部分包括:摄入量表、沟通模板和备忘录、流程流程图、检索和数据评估工具的图书馆指南以及在撰写阶段的指导标准。我们描述了该工具包在教育和项目管理方面的使用情况,重点是它在帮助管理团队时间、资源和期望方面的使用。

讨论

系统评价工具包有助于图书馆员将系统评价步骤和任务与可操作项联系起来。内容通过促进和支持图书馆员和团队成员的讨论和学习。该工具包帮助图书馆员共享过程每个阶段的重要信息和资源。

相似文献

1
Adopting a toolkit to manage time, resources, and expectations in the systematic review process: a case report.采用工具包管理系统评价过程中的时间、资源和预期:案例报告。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):637-642. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1221.
2
Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report.通过有效沟通解决系统综述团队面临的挑战:案例报告。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):643-647. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1222.
3
Graduate student confidence following a for-credit systematic review course pilot.研究生在学分制系统评价课程试点后的信心。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Apr 1;109(2):323-329. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1073.
4
The systematic review team: contributions of the health sciences librarian.系统评价团队:健康科学图书馆员的贡献
Med Ref Serv Q. 2011;30(3):301-15. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2011.590425.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
A competency framework for librarians involved in systematic reviews.参与系统评价的图书馆员的能力框架。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jul;105(3):268-275. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.189. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
7
Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services.通过将图书馆系统评价服务规范化,来增强图书馆员支持的能力并解决协作挑战。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jul;107(3):411-419. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.443. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
8
Medical librarians supporting information systems project lifecycles toward improved patient safety. Medical librarians possess expertise to navigate various search resources and can investigate inquiries during IS project lifecycles.医学图书馆员支持信息系统项目生命周期以提高患者安全。医学图书馆员具备驾驭各种搜索资源的专业知识,并且能够在信息系统项目生命周期内调查相关问题。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2010 Winter;24(1):52-6.
9
Learning while doing: program evaluation of the Medical Library Association Systematic Review Project.在做中学:医学图书馆协会系统评价项目的方案评估。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jul;106(3):284-293. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.286. Epub 2018 Jul 1.
10
It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks.这比你想象的要花更长时间:图书馆员在系统评价任务上花费的时间。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Apr;106(2):198-207. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.323. Epub 2018 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report.通过有效沟通解决系统综述团队面临的挑战:案例报告。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):643-647. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1222.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report.通过有效沟通解决系统综述团队面临的挑战:案例报告。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):643-647. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1222.
2
It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks.这比你想象的要花更长时间:图书馆员在系统评价任务上花费的时间。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Apr;106(2):198-207. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.323. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
3
Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review.图书馆员在系统评价中的作用:一项范围综述
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan;106(1):46-56. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.82. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
4
Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews.灰色文献:系统评价中的重要资源。
J Evid Based Med. 2017 Aug;10(3):233-240. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12266.
5
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
6
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
7
Systematic review automation technologies.系统评价自动化技术。
Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 9;3:74. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-74.
8
PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目声明
Epidemiology. 2011 Jan;22(1):128; author reply 128. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181fe7825.
9
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.用于报告评估卫生保健干预措施的研究的系统评价和荟萃分析的PRISMA声明:解释与详述
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
10
The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study.信息专家在系统评价过程中的作用:一个健康信息案例研究。
Health Info Libr J. 2003 Jun;20(2):65-74. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-1842.2003.00411.x.