• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多时间点模式分析:人格和行为对解码上下文相关脑连接动力学的影响。

Multi-timepoint pattern analysis: Influence of personality and behavior on decoding context-dependent brain connectivity dynamics.

机构信息

Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Mar;43(4):1403-1418. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25732. Epub 2021 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1002/hbm.25732
PMID:34859934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8837593/
Abstract

Behavioral traits are rarely considered in task-evoked functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, yet these traits can affect how an individual engages with the task, and thus lead to heterogeneity in task-evoked brain responses. We aimed to investigate whether interindividual variation in behavior associates with the accuracy of predicting task-evoked changes in the dynamics of functional brain connectivity measured with functional MRI. We developed a novel method called multi-timepoint pattern analysis (MTPA), in which binary logistic regression classifiers were trained to distinguish rest from each of 7 tasks (i.e., social cognition, working memory, language, relational, motor, gambling, emotion) based on functional connectivity dynamics measured in 1,000 healthy adults. We found that connectivity dynamics for multiple pairs of large-scale networks enabled individual classification between task and rest with accuracies exceeding 70%, with the most discriminatory connections relatively unique to each task. Crucially, interindividual variation in classification accuracy significantly associated with several behavioral, cognition and task performance measures. Classification between task and rest was generally more accurate for individuals with higher intelligence and task performance. Additionally, for some of the tasks, classification accuracy improved with lower perceived stress, lower aggression, higher alertness, and greater endurance. We conclude that heterogeneous dynamic adaptations of functional brain networks to changing cognitive demands can be reliably captured as linearly separable patterns by MTPA. Future studies should account for interindividual variation in behavior when investigating context-dependent dynamic functional connectivity.

摘要

行为特征在任务诱发功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究中很少被考虑,但这些特征会影响个体对任务的参与程度,从而导致任务诱发脑反应的异质性。我们旨在研究个体间行为差异是否与预测功能磁共振测量的功能脑连接动态的任务诱发变化的准确性相关。我们开发了一种称为多时间点模式分析(MTPA)的新方法,该方法使用二进制逻辑回归分类器根据 1000 名健康成年人测量的功能连接动力学,从休息和 7 种任务(社交认知、工作记忆、语言、关系、运动、赌博、情绪)中的每一种中进行区分。我们发现,多个大规模网络之间的连接动力学可以以超过 70%的准确率对任务和休息进行个体分类,最具区分性的连接相对每个任务都是独特的。至关重要的是,分类准确性的个体间差异与多种行为、认知和任务表现测量显著相关。对于那些具有较高智力和任务表现的个体,任务和休息之间的分类通常更准确。此外,对于某些任务,分类准确性随着感知压力的降低、攻击性的降低、警觉性的提高和耐力的提高而提高。我们的结论是,功能大脑网络对不断变化的认知需求的异质动态适应可以通过 MTPA 可靠地捕捉为线性可分离模式。未来的研究在研究上下文相关的动态功能连接时,应考虑个体间行为差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca3/8837593/122b0b593d50/HBM-43-1403-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca3/8837593/b1200dd3433e/HBM-43-1403-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca3/8837593/cc5f9beddf06/HBM-43-1403-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca3/8837593/b11077c5644d/HBM-43-1403-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca3/8837593/093932d43b9a/HBM-43-1403-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca3/8837593/122b0b593d50/HBM-43-1403-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca3/8837593/b1200dd3433e/HBM-43-1403-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca3/8837593/cc5f9beddf06/HBM-43-1403-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca3/8837593/b11077c5644d/HBM-43-1403-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca3/8837593/093932d43b9a/HBM-43-1403-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca3/8837593/122b0b593d50/HBM-43-1403-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Multi-timepoint pattern analysis: Influence of personality and behavior on decoding context-dependent brain connectivity dynamics.多时间点模式分析:人格和行为对解码上下文相关脑连接动力学的影响。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Mar;43(4):1403-1418. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25732. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
2
Tracking spatial dynamics of functional connectivity during a task.追踪任务期间功能连接的空间动态。
Neuroimage. 2021 Oct 1;239:118310. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118310. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
3
The Functional Relevance of Task-State Functional Connectivity.任务态功能连接的功能相关性。
J Neurosci. 2021 Mar 24;41(12):2684-2702. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1713-20.2021. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Large-scale intrinsic connectivity is consistent across varying task demands.大规模的内在连接在不同的任务需求中是一致的。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 10;14(4):e0213861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213861. eCollection 2019.
5
A human brain atlas derived via n-cut parcellation of resting-state and task-based fMRI data.通过对静息态和任务态功能磁共振成像数据进行n割法分割得出的人类脑图谱。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb;34(2):209-18. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.10.036. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
6
Resting-State Network Topology Differentiates Task Signals across the Adult Life Span.静息态网络拓扑结构在整个成年期对任务信号进行区分。
J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 8;37(10):2734-2745. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2406-16.2017. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
7
Evaluating methods for measuring background connectivity in slow event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging designs.评估慢事件相关功能磁共振成像设计中测量背景连接的方法。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jun;13(6):e3015. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3015. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
8
Task modulations and clinical manifestations in the brain functional connectome in 1615 fMRI datasets.1615个功能磁共振成像数据集的大脑功能连接组中的任务调制和临床表现
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:243-252. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.073. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
9
Higher Intelligence Is Associated with Less Task-Related Brain Network Reconfiguration.更高的智力与较少的任务相关脑网络重构有关。
J Neurosci. 2016 Aug 17;36(33):8551-61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0358-16.2016.
10
Predicting personality from network-based resting-state functional connectivity.基于网络的静息态功能连接预测人格
Brain Struct Funct. 2018 Jul;223(6):2699-2719. doi: 10.1007/s00429-018-1651-z. Epub 2018 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Explainable deep-learning framework: decoding brain states and prediction of individual performance in false-belief task at early childhood stage.可解释的深度学习框架:解码幼儿期错误信念任务中的脑状态并预测个体表现
Front Neuroinform. 2024 Jun 28;18:1392661. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2024.1392661. eCollection 2024.
2
Functional brain network dynamics of brooding in depression: insights from real-time fMRI neurofeedback.抑郁症中沉思的功能性脑网络动力学:来自实时功能磁共振成像神经反馈的见解
medRxiv. 2024 May 6:2024.05.05.24306889. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.05.24306889.
3
Within-subject reliability of brain networks during advanced meditation: An intensively sampled 7 Tesla MRI case study.

本文引用的文献

1
EEG Microstates Predict Concurrent fMRI Dynamic Functional Connectivity States.脑电微状态预测同时的 fMRI 动态功能连接状态。
Brain Topogr. 2021 Jan;34(1):41-55. doi: 10.1007/s10548-020-00805-1. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
2
Movie viewing elicits rich and reliable brain state dynamics.观影会引发丰富而可靠的大脑状态动力学。
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 5;11(1):5004. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18717-w.
3
Plasticity and Spontaneous Activity Pulses in Disused Human Brain Circuits.失用人类大脑回路中的可塑性和自发性活动脉冲。
在高级冥想过程中脑网络的内个体可靠性:一项高强度采样 7 特斯拉 MRI 案例研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 May;45(7):e26666. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26666.
4
Building a tissue-unbiased brain template of fiber orientation distribution and tractography with multimodal registration.基于多模态配准的纤维方向分布和轨迹构建组织无偏大脑模板。
Magn Reson Med. 2023 Mar;89(3):1207-1220. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29496. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
Neuron. 2020 Aug 5;107(3):580-589.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
4
Single-scale time-dependent window-sizes in sliding-window dynamic functional connectivity analysis: A validation study.滑动窗口动态功能连接分析中单标度时变窗口大小:验证研究。
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 15;220:117111. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117111. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
5
Idiosynchrony: From shared responses to individual differences during naturalistic neuroimaging.非同步现象:自然神经影像学中的从共享反应到个体差异。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 15;215:116828. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116828. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
6
Space: A Missing Piece of the Dynamic Puzzle.空间:动态拼图中的缺失部分。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Feb;24(2):135-149. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
7
Effects of stress on functional connectivity during problem solving.应激对解决问题过程中功能连接的影响。
Neuroimage. 2020 Mar;208:116407. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116407. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
8
Delineating functional segregations of the human middle temporal gyrus with resting-state functional connectivity and coactivation patterns.利用静息态功能连接和共激活模式描绘人类中颞叶的功能分离。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Dec 15;40(18):5159-5171. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24763. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
9
Dynamic brain network configurations during rest and an attention task with frequent occurrence of mind wandering.静息态和注意任务中频繁出现思维漫游时的动态脑网络构型。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Oct 15;40(15):4564-4576. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24721. Epub 2019 Aug 4.
10
Resting brain dynamics at different timescales capture distinct aspects of human behavior.静息态脑动力学在不同时间尺度上捕捉到人类行为的不同方面。
Nat Commun. 2019 May 24;10(1):2317. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10317-7.