• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可解释的深度学习框架:解码幼儿期错误信念任务中的脑状态并预测个体表现

Explainable deep-learning framework: decoding brain states and prediction of individual performance in false-belief task at early childhood stage.

作者信息

Bhavna Km, Akhter Azman, Banerjee Romi, Roy Dipanjan

机构信息

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Jodhpur, Karwar, Rajasthan, India.

Cognitive Brain Dynamics Lab, National Brain Research Centre, Manesar, Gurugram, India.

出版信息

Front Neuroinform. 2024 Jun 28;18:1392661. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2024.1392661. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fninf.2024.1392661
PMID:39006894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11239353/
Abstract

Decoding of cognitive states aims to identify individuals' brain states and brain fingerprints to predict behavior. Deep learning provides an important platform for analyzing brain signals at different developmental stages to understand brain dynamics. Due to their internal architecture and feature extraction techniques, existing machine-learning and deep-learning approaches are suffering from low classification performance and explainability issues that must be improved. In the current study, we hypothesized that even at the early childhood stage (as early as 3-years), connectivity between brain regions could decode brain states and predict behavioral performance in false-belief tasks. To this end, we proposed an explainable deep learning framework to decode brain states (Theory of Mind and Pain states) and predict individual performance on ToM-related false-belief tasks in a developmental dataset. We proposed an explainable spatiotemporal connectivity-based Graph Convolutional Neural Network (Ex-stGCNN) model for decoding brain states. Here, we consider a developmental dataset, = 155 (122 children; 3-12 yrs and 33 adults; 18-39 yrs), in which participants watched a short, soundless animated movie, shown to activate Theory-of-Mind (ToM) and pain networs. After scanning, the participants underwent a ToM-related false-belief task, leading to categorization into the pass, fail, and inconsistent groups based on performance. We trained our proposed model using Functional Connectivity (FC) and Inter-Subject Functional Correlations (ISFC) matrices separately. We observed that the stimulus-driven feature set (ISFC) could capture ToM and Pain brain states more accurately with an average accuracy of 94%, whereas it achieved 85% accuracy using FC matrices. We also validated our results using five-fold cross-validation and achieved an average accuracy of 92%. Besides this study, we applied the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach to identify brain fingerprints that contributed the most to predictions. We hypothesized that ToM network brain connectivity could predict individual performance on false-belief tasks. We proposed an Explainable Convolutional Variational Auto-Encoder (Ex-Convolutional VAE) model to predict individual performance on false-belief tasks and trained the model using FC and ISFC matrices separately. ISFC matrices again outperformed the FC matrices in prediction of individual performance. We achieved 93.5% accuracy with an F1-score of 0.94 using ISFC matrices and achieved 90% accuracy with an F1-score of 0.91 using FC matrices.

摘要

认知状态解码旨在识别个体的脑状态和脑指纹以预测行为。深度学习为分析不同发育阶段的脑信号以理解脑动力学提供了一个重要平台。由于其内部架构和特征提取技术,现有的机器学习和深度学习方法存在分类性能低和可解释性问题,这些问题必须得到改善。在当前研究中,我们假设即使在幼儿期(早在3岁时),脑区之间的连接性也能够解码脑状态并预测错误信念任务中的行为表现。为此,我们提出了一个可解释的深度学习框架,用于在一个发育数据集中解码脑状态(心理理论和疼痛状态)并预测个体在与心理理论相关的错误信念任务中的表现。我们提出了一种基于可解释的时空连接性的图卷积神经网络(Ex-stGCNN)模型来解码脑状态。在此,我们考虑一个发育数据集,N = 155(122名儿童;3至12岁,33名成年人;18至39岁),其中参与者观看了一部无声的短动画电影,该电影被证明能激活心理理论(ToM)和疼痛网络。扫描后,参与者进行了一项与心理理论相关的错误信念任务,根据表现被分类为通过、未通过和不一致组。我们分别使用功能连接(FC)和个体间功能相关性(ISFC)矩阵训练我们提出的模型。我们观察到,刺激驱动的特征集(ISFC)能够更准确地捕捉心理理论和疼痛脑状态,平均准确率为94%,而使用FC矩阵时准确率为85%。我们还使用五折交叉验证对结果进行了验证,平均准确率达到了92%。除此之外,我们应用夏普利值附加解释(SHAP)方法来识别对预测贡献最大的脑指纹。我们假设心理理论网络的脑连接性能够预测错误信念任务中的个体表现。我们提出了一个可解释的卷积变分自编码器(Ex-卷积VAE)模型来预测错误信念任务中的个体表现,并分别使用FC和ISFC矩阵训练该模型。在预测个体表现方面,ISFC矩阵再次优于FC矩阵。使用ISFC矩阵时,我们的准确率达到了93.5%,F1分数为0.94;使用FC矩阵时,准确率为90%,F1分数为0.91。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/291607e4dec0/fninf-18-1392661-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/ccf1186ec304/fninf-18-1392661-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/e59b5f1239d9/fninf-18-1392661-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/2bb6cb8089ef/fninf-18-1392661-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/2a5e4e932f15/fninf-18-1392661-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/239736deb55e/fninf-18-1392661-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/dffd44f942a4/fninf-18-1392661-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/029013990ae4/fninf-18-1392661-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/db3bd820961e/fninf-18-1392661-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/07f870363308/fninf-18-1392661-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/06da878f3fc1/fninf-18-1392661-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/6ea6fa2fab25/fninf-18-1392661-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/291607e4dec0/fninf-18-1392661-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/ccf1186ec304/fninf-18-1392661-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/e59b5f1239d9/fninf-18-1392661-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/2bb6cb8089ef/fninf-18-1392661-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/2a5e4e932f15/fninf-18-1392661-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/239736deb55e/fninf-18-1392661-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/dffd44f942a4/fninf-18-1392661-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/029013990ae4/fninf-18-1392661-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/db3bd820961e/fninf-18-1392661-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/07f870363308/fninf-18-1392661-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/06da878f3fc1/fninf-18-1392661-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/6ea6fa2fab25/fninf-18-1392661-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311d/11239353/291607e4dec0/fninf-18-1392661-g0012.jpg

相似文献

1
Explainable deep-learning framework: decoding brain states and prediction of individual performance in false-belief task at early childhood stage.可解释的深度学习框架:解码幼儿期错误信念任务中的脑状态并预测个体表现
Front Neuroinform. 2024 Jun 28;18:1392661. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2024.1392661. eCollection 2024.
2
Perceptual Access Reasoning (PAR) in Developing a Representational Theory of Mind.发展心理表象理论的知觉访问推理 (PAR)。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2021 Sep;86(3):7-154. doi: 10.1111/mono.12432.
3
A tale of two connectivities: intra- and inter-subject functional connectivity jointly enable better prediction of social abilities.两种连通性的故事:个体内和个体间功能连通性共同助力对社交能力的更好预测。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Sep 1;16:875828. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.875828. eCollection 2022.
4
Characterization of the temporal stability of ToM and pain functional brain networks carry distinct developmental signatures during naturalistic viewing.在自然观察过程中,ToM 和疼痛功能大脑网络的时间稳定性特征表现出不同的发展特征。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):22479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72945-4.
5
Exploring links between language and cognition in autism spectrum disorders: Complement sentences, false belief, and executive functioning.探索自闭症谱系障碍中语言与认知之间的联系:补语句、错误信念与执行功能。
J Commun Disord. 2015 Mar-Apr;54:15-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
6
Theory of Mind impairments in early course schizophrenia: An fMRI study.早期精神分裂症的心理理论缺陷:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Apr;136:236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
7
Explainable fMRI-based brain decoding via spatial temporal-pyramid graph convolutional network.基于可解释功能磁共振成像的时空金字塔图卷积网络脑解码。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 May;44(7):2921-2935. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26255. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
8
GCNs-Net: A Graph Convolutional Neural Network Approach for Decoding Time-Resolved EEG Motor Imagery Signals.GCNs-Net:一种用于解码时分辨脑电运动想象信号的图卷积神经网络方法。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2024 Jun;35(6):7312-7323. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3202569. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
9
Brain decoding of the Human Connectome Project tasks in a dense individual fMRI dataset.在密集的个体 fMRI 数据集上对人类连接组计划任务进行大脑解码。
Neuroimage. 2023 Dec 1;283:120395. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120395. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
10
A hybrid explainable ensemble transformer encoder for pneumonia identification from chest X-ray images.一种用于从胸部 X 光图像中识别肺炎的混合可解释集成式变压器编码器。
J Adv Res. 2023 Jun;48:191-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.08.021. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Degradation-aware neural imputation: Advancing decoding stability in brain machine interfaces.降解感知神经插补:提升脑机接口中的解码稳定性
APL Bioeng. 2025 Apr 16;9(2):026106. doi: 10.1063/5.0250296. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Unsupervised Joint Domain Adaptation for Decoding Brain Cognitive States From tfMRI Images.基于 tfMRI 图像的无监督联合域自适应解码大脑认知状态
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2024 Mar;28(3):1494-1503. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2023.3348130. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
2
Explainable fMRI-based brain decoding via spatial temporal-pyramid graph convolutional network.基于可解释功能磁共振成像的时空金字塔图卷积网络脑解码。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 May;44(7):2921-2935. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26255. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
3
A tale of two connectivities: intra- and inter-subject functional connectivity jointly enable better prediction of social abilities.
两种连通性的故事:个体内和个体间功能连通性共同助力对社交能力的更好预测。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Sep 1;16:875828. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.875828. eCollection 2022.
4
GCNs-Net: A Graph Convolutional Neural Network Approach for Decoding Time-Resolved EEG Motor Imagery Signals.GCNs-Net:一种用于解码时分辨脑电运动想象信号的图卷积神经网络方法。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2024 Jun;35(6):7312-7323. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3202569. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
5
Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Survey.图神经网络中的可解释性:分类学综述。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2023 May;45(5):5782-5799. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3204236. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
6
Decoding Task-Based fMRI Data with Graph Neural Networks, Considering Individual Differences.使用图神经网络解码基于任务的功能磁共振成像数据,并考虑个体差异。
Brain Sci. 2022 Aug 17;12(8):1094. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081094.
7
Multi-timepoint pattern analysis: Influence of personality and behavior on decoding context-dependent brain connectivity dynamics.多时间点模式分析:人格和行为对解码上下文相关脑连接动力学的影响。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Mar;43(4):1403-1418. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25732. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
8
BrainGNN: Interpretable Brain Graph Neural Network for fMRI Analysis.脑图神经网络:用于 fMRI 分析的可解释脑图神经网络。
Med Image Anal. 2021 Dec;74:102233. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102233. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
9
Movie-watching outperforms rest for functional connectivity-based prediction of behavior.观影优于休息,基于功能连接预测行为。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jul 15;235:117963. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117963. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
10
Effect of Dataset Size and Train/Test Split Ratios in QSAR/QSPR Multiclass Classification.数据集大小和训练/测试分割比例对 QSAR/QSPR 多类分类的影响。
Molecules. 2021 Feb 19;26(4):1111. doi: 10.3390/molecules26041111.