Department of Sport and Health Sciences, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, 114 86, Box 5626, Stockholm, Sweden.
Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sports Med. 2022 Apr;52(4):773-788. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01597-5. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
While the psychosocial risk factors for traumatic injuries have been comprehensively investigated, less is known about psychosocial factors predisposing athletes to overuse injuries.
The aim of this review was to systematically identify studies and synthesise data that examined psychosocial risk factors for overuse injuries in athletes.
Systematic review.
MEDLINE, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases, supplemented by hand searching of journals and reference lists.
Quantitative and qualitative studies involving competitive athletes, published prior to July 2021, and reporting the relationship between psychosocial variables and overuse injury as an outcome were reviewed. This was limited to academic peer-reviewed journals in Swedish, English, German, Spanish and French. An assessment of the risk of bias was performed using modified versions of the RoBANS and SBU Quality Assessment Scale for Qualitative Studies.
Nine quantitative and five qualitative studies evaluating 1061 athletes and 27 psychosocial factors were included for review. Intra-personal factors, inter-personal factors and sociocultural factors were found to be related to the risk of overuse injury when synthesised and reported according to a narrative synthesis approach. Importantly, these psychosocial factors, and the potential mechanisms describing how they might contribute to overuse injury development, appeared to be different compared with those already known for traumatic injuries.
There is preliminary evidence that overuse injuries are likely to partially result from complex interactions between psychosocial factors. Coaches and supporting staff are encouraged to acknowledge the similarities and differences between traumatic and overuse injury aetiology.
虽然创伤性损伤的心理社会风险因素已得到全面研究,但对于导致运动员过度使用损伤的心理社会因素知之甚少。
本综述的目的是系统地识别研究并综合分析检查运动员过度使用损伤的心理社会风险因素的数据。
系统综述。
MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 PsycINFO 数据库,并通过手检期刊和参考文献进行补充。
纳入了涉及竞技运动员的定量和定性研究,发表时间在 2021 年 7 月之前,并报告了心理社会变量与过度使用损伤作为结果之间的关系。这仅限于瑞典语、英语、德语、西班牙语和法语的学术同行评议期刊。使用 RoBANS 和 SBU 定性研究质量评估量表的修改版本对偏倚风险进行了评估。
纳入了 9 项定量研究和 5 项定性研究,共评估了 1061 名运动员和 27 个心理社会因素。根据叙述性综合方法进行综合和报告时,发现个体内部因素、人际因素和社会文化因素与过度使用损伤的风险有关。重要的是,这些心理社会因素,以及描述它们如何导致过度使用损伤发展的潜在机制,似乎与已经知道的创伤性损伤的因素不同。
有初步证据表明,过度使用损伤可能部分是由心理社会因素之间的复杂相互作用引起的。鼓励教练和支持人员认识到创伤性和过度使用损伤病因之间的相似之处和差异。