Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Centre, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Box 5626, 114 86, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Physiology, Nutrition, Biomechanics, Sport Performance and Exercise Research and Innovation Centre-Stockholm, SPERIC-S, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sports Med. 2024 Jul;54(7):1733-1748. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02045-w. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
Factors influencing sport injury risk, rehabilitation outcomes, and return to sport processes have been the focus in various research disciplines (sports medicine, psychology and sociology). One discipline, with over 50 years of scholarship, is the psychology of sport injury. Despite the research in this field, there is no evidence-based consensus to inform professional practice. The aim of this original and timely consensus statement is to summarise psychological sport injury research and provide consensus recommendations for sport practitioners seeking to implement psychological principles into clinical practice. A total of seven experts with extensive experience outlined the consensus objectives and identified three psychology of sport injury sub-domains: risk, rehabilitation and return to sport. The researchers, grouped in pairs, prepared initial drafts of assigned sub-domains. The group met in Stockholm, and the three texts were merged into a draft and revised in an iterative process. Stress responses are the strongest psychological risk factor for acute injuries. Intra- and interpersonal factors, as well as sociocultural factors, are demonstrated psychosocial risk factors for overuse injuries. Stress management and mindfulness interventions to prevent injuries have been successfully implemented. The rehabilitation process may influence athlete's cognitive, emotional, and behavioural responses. Social support, mindfulness, acceptance-based practices, and cognitive-behavioural based intervention programs reduce negative reactions. Return to sport includes various stages and different trajectories. Returning athletes typically experience concerns regarding competence, autonomy, and relatedness. It is recommended that athletes focus on the physical, technical, and psychological demands of their sport as they progress to increasingly intense activities. Interdisciplinary collaboration (e.g., sports medicine and psychology) would be beneficial in enhancing clinical practice and improving athlete outcomes.
影响运动损伤风险、康复结果和重返运动过程的因素一直是各研究学科(运动医学、心理学和社会学)的关注焦点。其中一个学科已有 50 多年的学术研究,即运动损伤心理学。尽管该领域进行了大量研究,但仍缺乏循证共识来为专业实践提供信息。本原始且及时的共识声明旨在总结运动损伤心理学研究,并为寻求将心理原则应用于临床实践的运动从业者提供共识建议。共有七位具有丰富经验的专家概述了共识目标,并确定了运动损伤心理学的三个子领域:风险、康复和重返运动。研究人员分为两组,分别准备指定子领域的初步草案。该小组在斯德哥尔摩举行会议,将这三个文本合并成一份草稿,并在迭代过程中进行修订。应激反应是急性损伤最强的心理风险因素。内-人际因素以及社会文化因素已被证明是过度使用损伤的心理社会风险因素。压力管理和正念干预已成功用于预防损伤。康复过程可能会影响运动员的认知、情感和行为反应。社会支持、正念、基于接受的实践和基于认知行为的干预计划可减少负面反应。重返运动包括不同的阶段和不同的轨迹。回归的运动员通常会对能力、自主性和关联性感到担忧。建议运动员在逐渐进行更激烈的活动时,专注于运动的身体、技术和心理需求。跨学科合作(例如运动医学和心理学)将有益于增强临床实践和改善运动员的结果。