Weber Sarah R, Zhao Yuanjun, Ma Jingqun, Gates Christopher, da Veiga Leprevost Felipe, Basrur Venkatesha, Nesvizhskii Alexey I, Gardner Thomas W, Sundstrom Jeffrey M
Department of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan Medical School, 1000 Wall Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
Clin Proteomics. 2021 Dec 3;18(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12014-021-09328-8.
Vitreous is an accessible, information-rich biofluid that has recently been studied as a source of retinal disease-related proteins and pathways. However, the number of samples required to confidently identify perturbed pathways remains unknown. In order to confidently identify these pathways, power analysis must be performed to determine the number of samples required, and sample preparation and analysis must be rigorously defined.
Control (n = 27) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (n = 23) vitreous samples were treated as biologically distinct individuals or pooled together and aliquoted into technical replicates. Quantitative mass spectrometry with tandem mass tag labeling was used to identify proteins in individual or pooled control samples to determine technical and biological variability. To determine effect size and perform power analysis, control and proliferative diabetic retinopathy samples were analyzed across four 10-plexes. Pooled samples were used to normalize the data across plexes and generate a single data matrix for downstream analysis.
The total number of unique proteins identified was 1152 in experiment 1, 989 of which were measured in all samples. In experiment 2, 1191 proteins were identified, 727 of which were measured across all samples in all plexes. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD025986. Spearman correlations of protein abundance estimations revealed minimal technical (0.99-1.00) and biological (0.94-0.98) variability. Each plex contained two unique pooled samples: one for normalizing across each 10-plex, and one to internally validate the normalization algorithm. Spearman correlation of the validation pool following normalization was 0.86-0.90. Principal component analysis revealed stratification of samples by disease and not by plex. Subsequent differential expression and pathway analyses demonstrated significant activation of metabolic pathways and inhibition of neuroprotective pathways in proliferative diabetic retinopathy samples relative to controls.
This study demonstrates a feasible, rigorous, and scalable method that can be applied to future proteomic studies of vitreous and identifies previously unrecognized metabolic pathways that advance understanding of diabetic retinopathy.
玻璃体是一种易于获取且信息丰富的生物流体,最近已被作为视网膜疾病相关蛋白质和信号通路的来源进行研究。然而,要可靠地识别受干扰的信号通路所需的样本数量仍然未知。为了可靠地识别这些信号通路,必须进行功效分析以确定所需的样本数量,并且必须严格定义样本制备和分析方法。
将对照(n = 27)和增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(n = 23)玻璃体样本作为生物学上不同的个体进行处理,或合并在一起并分成技术重复样本。使用串联质量标签标记的定量质谱法来识别单个或合并的对照样本中的蛋白质,以确定技术和生物学变异性。为了确定效应大小并进行功效分析,对对照和增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变样本进行了四次10重分析。合并样本用于跨分析批次对数据进行归一化,并生成一个单一的数据矩阵用于下游分析。
实验1中鉴定出的独特蛋白质总数为1152种,其中989种在所有样本中均有检测。在实验2中,鉴定出1191种蛋白质,其中727种在所有分析批次的所有样本中均有检测。数据可通过ProteomeXchange获得,标识符为PXD025986。蛋白质丰度估计值的斯皮尔曼相关性显示技术变异性极小(0.99 - 1.00),生物学变异性也极小(0.94 - 0.98)。每个分析批次包含两个独特的合并样本:一个用于跨每个10重分析进行归一化,另一个用于内部验证归一化算法。归一化后验证样本的斯皮尔曼相关性为0.86 - 0.90。主成分分析显示样本按疾病分层,而非按分析批次分层。随后的差异表达和信号通路分析表明,相对于对照,增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变样本中的代谢信号通路显著激活,神经保护信号通路受到抑制。
本研究展示了一种可行、严谨且可扩展的方法,可应用于未来玻璃体蛋白质组学研究,并识别出先前未被认识的代谢信号通路,从而增进对糖尿病视网膜病变的理解。