School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Institute of Archaeology, University College London (UCL), London, UK; School of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University, Beijing, China; McDonald Institute of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar;37(3):268-279. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
The evidence from ancient crops over the past decade challenges some of our most basic assumptions about the process of domestication. The emergence of crops has been viewed as a technologically progressive process in which single or multiple localized populations adapt to human environments in response to cultivation. By contrast, new genetic and archaeological evidence reveals a slow process that involved large populations over wide areas with unexpectedly sustained cultural connections in deep time. We review evidence that calls for a new landscape framework of crop origins. Evolutionary processes operate across vast distances of landscape and time, and the origins of domesticates are complex. The domestication bottleneck is a redundant concept and the progressive nature of domestication is in doubt.
过去十年中,古代作物的证据挑战了我们关于驯化过程的一些最基本的假设。作物的出现被视为一个技术进步的过程,在这个过程中,单一或多个局部地区的种群适应人类环境,以响应种植。相比之下,新的遗传和考古证据揭示了一个缓慢的过程,涉及到大面积的大量人口,并且在深远的时间里有着出人意料的持续文化联系。我们回顾了一些证据,这些证据呼吁建立一个新的作物起源景观框架。进化过程跨越了广阔的景观和时间距离,而驯化的起源是复杂的。驯化瓶颈是一个冗余的概念,而驯化的渐进性质也值得怀疑。