The Levi Eshkol School of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
The Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Trends Plant Sci. 2017 Jun;22(6):491-511. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
The Agricultural Revolution and plant domestication in the Near East (among its components) have fascinated generations of scholars. Here, we narrate the history of ideas underlying plant domestication research since the late 19th century. Biological and cultural perspectives are presented through two prevailing models: one views plant domestication as a protracted, unconscious evolutionary mutualistic (noncentric) process. The second advocates a punctuated, knowledge-based human initiative (centric). We scrutinize the research landscape while assessing the underlying evolutionary and cultural mechanisms. A parsimony measure indicates that the punctuated-centric view better accords with archaeological records, and the geobotany and biology of the species, and requires fewer assumptions. The protracted alternative requires many assumptions, does not account for legume biology, fails to distinguish domestication from postdomestication changes, and, therefore, is less parsimonious.
近东地区的农业革命和植物驯化(其中的组成部分)吸引了几代学者。在这里,我们叙述了自 19 世纪后期以来植物驯化研究的思想历史。通过两种流行的模型展示了生物学和文化视角:一种观点认为植物驯化是一个漫长的、无意识的进化互利(非中心)过程。另一种观点则主张是一个有时间停顿的、基于知识的人类主动性(中心)过程。我们在评估潜在的进化和文化机制的同时,仔细研究了研究领域。一个简约性衡量标准表明,有时间停顿的中心观点更符合考古记录,以及物种的植物地理学和生物学,并且需要更少的假设。而漫长的替代观点则需要许多假设,不能解释豆类生物学,无法区分驯化和驯化后的变化,因此,不够简约。