• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用系统动力学人口建模研究三种共存烟草相关产品的健康影响:意大利人口案例研究。

Investigating the Health Effects of 3 Coexisting Tobacco-Related Products Using System Dynamics Population Modeling: An Italian Population Case Study.

机构信息

British American Tobacco, R&D, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Ventana Systems UK Ltd., Salisbury, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 16;9:700473. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.700473. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.700473
PMID:34869141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8634955/
Abstract

With the proliferation of tobacco products, there might be a need for more complex models than current two-product models. We have developed a three-product model able to represent interactions between three products in the marketplace. We also investigate if using several implementations of two-product models could provide sufficient information to assess 3 coexisting products. Italy is used as case-study with THPs and e-cigarettes as the products under investigation. We use transitions rates estimated for THPs in Japan and e-cigarettes in the USA to project what could happen if the Italian population were to behave as the Japanese for THP or USA for e-cigarettes. Results suggest that three-product models may be hindered by data availability while two product models could miss potential synergies between products. Both, THP and E-Cigarette scenarios, led to reduction in life-years lost although the Japanese THP scenario reductions were 3 times larger than the USA e-cigarette projections.

摘要

随着烟草产品的扩散,可能需要比当前的两种产品模型更复杂的模型。我们开发了一种三产品模型,能够代表市场上三种产品之间的相互作用。我们还研究了使用两种产品模型的多个实现是否可以提供足够的信息来评估 3 种共存产品。意大利被用作案例研究,以加热不燃烧产品和电子烟作为研究对象。我们使用在日本为加热不燃烧产品和在美国为电子烟估计的转移率来预测,如果意大利人口的行为像日本人对加热不燃烧产品或美国人对电子烟那样,会发生什么情况。结果表明,三产品模型可能受到数据可用性的限制,而两产品模型可能会忽略产品之间的潜在协同作用。加热不燃烧产品和电子烟两种情况都导致了生命年损失的减少,尽管日本加热不燃烧产品的减少幅度是美国电子烟预测的 3 倍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/8634955/b962d8821c5d/fpubh-09-700473-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/8634955/2de3e5ec41a5/fpubh-09-700473-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/8634955/c8c7f784d4dd/fpubh-09-700473-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/8634955/62315344ed0b/fpubh-09-700473-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/8634955/b962d8821c5d/fpubh-09-700473-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/8634955/2de3e5ec41a5/fpubh-09-700473-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/8634955/c8c7f784d4dd/fpubh-09-700473-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/8634955/62315344ed0b/fpubh-09-700473-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/8634955/b962d8821c5d/fpubh-09-700473-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating the Health Effects of 3 Coexisting Tobacco-Related Products Using System Dynamics Population Modeling: An Italian Population Case Study.使用系统动力学人口建模研究三种共存烟草相关产品的健康影响:意大利人口案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 16;9:700473. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.700473. eCollection 2021.
2
Effects of reduced-risk nicotine-delivery products on smoking prevalence and cigarette sales: an observational study.降低风险尼古丁传递产品对吸烟率和香烟销售的影响:一项观察性研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Sep;11(7):1-39. doi: 10.3310/RPDN7327.
3
Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 5: In vitro dosimetric and cytotoxic assessment.加热不燃烧烟草制品 THP1.0 评估. 第 5 部分:体外剂量学和细胞毒性评估。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;93:52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
4
An abuse liability assessment of the glo tobacco heating product in comparison to combustible cigarettes and nicotine replacement therapy.加热不燃烧烟草制品与可燃香烟和尼古丁替代疗法的滥用倾向评估比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 29;12(1):14701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19167-8.
5
A cross-category puffing topography, mouth level exposure and consumption study among Italian users of tobacco and nicotine products.意大利烟草和尼古丁制品使用者的跨品类抽吸特征、口腔水平暴露和消费研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 8;10(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55410-5.
6
Optimization of aqueous aerosol extract (AqE) generation from e-cigarettes and tobacco heating products for in vitro cytotoxicity testing.优化电子烟和加热不燃烧烟草制品水气溶胶提取物(AqE)的生成,用于体外细胞毒性测试。
Toxicol Lett. 2020 Dec 15;335:51-63. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 8: Study to determine puffing topography, mouth level exposure and consumption among Japanese users.加热不燃烧烟草制品 THP1.0 评估。第 8 部分:日本使用者的抽吸模式、口腔暴露水平和消费情况研究。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;93:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
8
Changes in Biomarkers of Exposure on Switching From a Conventional Cigarette to Tobacco Heating Products: A Randomized, Controlled Study in Healthy Japanese Subjects.从传统香烟切换至加热不燃烧烟草制品后暴露生物标志物的变化:一项在健康日本受试者中开展的随机对照研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Aug 19;21(9):1220-1227. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty104.
9
[Patterns of electronic cigarette and tobacco heating products use in Spain.].[西班牙电子烟和烟草加热产品的使用模式。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2021 Sep 22;95:e202109124.
10
Comparison of effects of tobacco cigarettes, electronic nicotine delivery systems and tobacco heating products on miRNA-mediated gene expression. A systematic review.比较烟草香烟、电子尼古丁输送系统和加热烟草产品对 miRNA 介导的基因表达的影响。系统评价。
Toxicol Mech Methods. 2023 Jan;33(1):18-37. doi: 10.1080/15376516.2022.2089610. Epub 2022 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Behavioural Studies on Heated Tobacco Products.加热烟草制品行为研究的范围综述
Cureus. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):e65773. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65773. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Transitions between cigarette, ENDS and dual use in adults in the PATH study (waves 1-4): multistate transition modelling accounting for complex survey design.PATH研究(第1-4轮)中成年人在卷烟、电子烟及双重使用之间的转变:考虑复杂调查设计的多状态转变建模
Tob Control. 2020 Nov 16. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055967.
2
Rapid increase in heated tobacco product (HTP) use from 2015 to 2019: from the Japan 'Society and New Tobacco' Internet Survey (JASTIS).2015年至2019年加热烟草制品(HTP)使用量的快速增长:来自日本“社会与新烟草”互联网调查(JASTIS)。
Tob Control. 2020 Jun 5;30(4):474-5. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055652.
3
Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches.
估算近期推出的改良风险烟草产品对人群健康的影响:不同方法的比较。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Feb 16;23(3):426-437. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa102.
4
Electronic Cigarette Use Among U.S. Adults, 2018.2018年美国成年人使用电子烟的情况
NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Apr(365):1-8.
5
Results from a 2018 cross-sectional survey in Tokyo, Osaka and Sendai to assess tobacco and nicotine product usage after the introduction of heated tobacco products (HTPs) in Japan.2018 年在东京、大阪和仙台进行的一项横断面调查结果,评估了日本引入加热烟草产品(HTPs)后烟草和尼古丁产品的使用情况。
Harm Reduct J. 2020 May 26;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00374-3.
6
Heat-not-burn tobacco, electronic cigarettes, and combustible cigarette use among Japanese adolescents: a nationwide population survey 2017.加热不燃烧烟草制品、电子烟和可燃卷烟在日本青少年中的使用:2017 年全国人群调查。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 20;20(1):741. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08916-x.
7
Electronic cigarettes in Italy: a tool for harm reduction or a gateway to smoking tobacco?意大利的电子烟:减少伤害的工具还是吸烟的入口?
Tob Control. 2020 Mar;29(2):148-152. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054726. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
8
Changes in Biomarkers of Exposure on Switching From a Conventional Cigarette to Tobacco Heating Products: A Randomized, Controlled Study in Healthy Japanese Subjects.从传统香烟切换至加热不燃烧烟草制品后暴露生物标志物的变化:一项在健康日本受试者中开展的随机对照研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Aug 19;21(9):1220-1227. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty104.
9
Modeling the Population Health Impact of Introducing a Modified Risk Tobacco Product into the U.S. Market.模拟向美国市场引入改良风险烟草产品对人群健康的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2018 May 16;6(2):47. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6020047.
10
Heat-Not-Burn Tobacco Products Are Getting Hot in Italy.加热不燃烧烟草制品在意大利正变得热门起来。
J Epidemiol. 2018 May 5;28(5):274-275. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20180040. Epub 2018 Apr 14.