Juluru Krishna, Shih Hao-Hsin, Keshava Murthy Krishna Nand, Elnajjar Pierre, El-Rowmeim Amin, Roth Christopher, Genereaux Brad, Fox Josef, Siegel Eliot, Rubin Daniel L
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (K.J., H.H.S., K.N.K.M., P.E., A.E.R., J.F.); Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.R.); NVIDIA, Santa Clara, Calif (B.G.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (E.S.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.L.R.).
Radiol Artif Intell. 2021 Aug 4;3(6):e210013. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2021210013. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) applications within clinical workflows is an important step for leveraging developed AI algorithms. In this report, generalizable components for deploying AI systems into clinical practice are described that were implemented in a clinical pilot study using lymphoscintigraphy examinations as a prospective use case (July 1, 2019-October 31, 2020). Deployment of the AI algorithm consisted of seven software components, as follows: image delivery, quality control, a results database, results processing, results presentation and delivery, error correction, and a dashboard for performance monitoring. A total of 14 users used the system (faculty radiologists and trainees) to assess the degree of satisfaction with the components and overall workflow. Analyses included the assessment of the number of examinations processed, error rates, and corrections. The AI system processed 1748 lymphoscintigraphy examinations. The system enabled radiologists to correct 146 AI results, generating real-time corrections to the radiology report. All AI results and corrections were successfully stored in a database for downstream use by the various integration components. A dashboard allowed monitoring of the AI system performance in real time. All 14 survey respondents "somewhat agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the AI system was well integrated into the clinical workflow. In all, a framework of processes and components for integrating AI algorithms into clinical workflows was developed. The implementation described could be helpful for assessing and monitoring AI performance in clinical practice. PACS, Computer Applications-General (Informatics), Diagnosis © RSNA, 2021.
将人工智能(AI)应用整合到临床工作流程中是利用已开发的AI算法的重要一步。在本报告中,描述了将AI系统部署到临床实践中的通用组件,这些组件是在一项临床试点研究中实施的,该研究以前瞻性方式使用淋巴闪烁显像检查作为用例(2019年7月1日至2020年10月31日)。AI算法的部署由七个软件组件组成,如下:图像传输、质量控制、结果数据库、结果处理、结果呈现与交付、纠错以及性能监测仪表板。共有14名用户(放射科教员和实习生)使用该系统来评估对这些组件和整体工作流程的满意度。分析包括对处理的检查数量、错误率和纠错情况的评估。AI系统处理了1748例淋巴闪烁显像检查。该系统使放射科医生能够纠正146个AI结果,并对放射学报告进行实时更正。所有AI结果和更正都成功存储在数据库中,以供各个集成组件下游使用。一个仪表板允许实时监测AI系统性能。所有14名调查受访者“ somewhat agreed”(有些同意)或“ strongly agreed”(强烈同意)AI系统已很好地整合到临床工作流程中。总之,开发了一个将AI算法整合到临床工作流程中的流程和组件框架。所描述的实施方法可能有助于评估和监测临床实践中的AI性能。PACS,计算机应用-一般(信息学),诊断©RSNA,2021年