The statistics wars and intellectual conflicts of interest.
作者信息
Mayo Deborah G
机构信息
Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
出版信息
Conserv Biol. 2022 Feb;36(1):e13861. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13861. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The statistics wars and intellectual conflicts of interest.统计学之争与利益相关的学术冲突。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Feb;36(1):e13861. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13861. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation.在保护区选择过程中纳入对武装冲突风险的态度以进行保护。
Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 30;7:11042. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11042.
3
Statistical significance and conflicts of interest: Response to Mayo (2022).
Conserv Biol. 2022 Oct;36(5):e13985. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13985. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
4
[Protection of medical personnel in contemporary armed conflicts].[当代武装冲突中医疗人员的保护]
Wiad Lek. 2016;69(2 Pt 2):280-4.
5
Need for conservation planning in postconflict Colombia.冲突后哥伦比亚的保护规划需求
Conserv Biol. 2017 Jun;31(3):499-500. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12935.
6
Fires in protected areas reveal unforeseen costs of Colombian peace.保护区火灾揭示了哥伦比亚和平的意料之外代价。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Jan;3(1):20-23. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0727-8. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
7
Estimating the Number of Civilian Casualties in Modern Armed Conflicts-A Systematic Review.估算现代武装冲突中的平民伤亡人数——一项系统综述
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 28;9:765261. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.765261. eCollection 2021.
8
Ecological footprint of Russia's Ukraine invasion.俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的生态足迹。
Science. 2022 Sep 16;377(6612):1273. doi: 10.1126/science.ade6869. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
9
Estimating indirect mortality impacts of armed conflict in civilian populations: panel regression analyses of 193 countries, 1990-2017.估算武装冲突对平民人口间接死亡的影响：1990-2017 年 193 个国家的面板回归分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Sep 10;18(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01708-5.
10
Stop military conflicts from trashing environment.阻止军事冲突破坏环境。
Nature. 2019 Jul;571(7766):478. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02248-6.
引用本文的文献
1
A Bureaucratic Theory of Statistics.一种统计学的官僚理论。
Obs Stud. 2025 Apr 11;11(1):77-84. doi: 10.1353/obs.2025.a956843. eCollection 2025.
2
Statistical significance and its critics: practicing damaging science, or damaging scientific practice?统计学显著性及其批评者：是在践行有害科学，还是在损害科学实践？
Synthese. 2022;200(3):220. doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-03692-0. Epub 2022 May 12.
本文引用的文献
1
Do we need to adjust for interim analyses in a Bayesian adaptive trial design?在贝叶斯自适应试验设计中，我们是否需要针对中期分析进行调整？
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 10;20(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01042-7.
2
New Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in the .关于……的统计报告新指南 （原文中“in the.”后面内容缺失，翻译可能不太完整准确）
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 18;381(3):285-286. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1906559.
3
Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for Tests, Correlations, and Meta-Analyses.等效性检验：检验、相关性及荟萃分析实用入门指南
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 May;8(4):355-362. doi: 10.1177/1948550617697177. Epub 2017 May 5.
4
Metaresearch for Evaluating Reproducibility in Ecology and Evolution.评估生态学与进化领域可重复性的元研究
Bioscience. 2017 Mar 1;67(3):282-289. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw159. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
5
A critical evaluation of the current "p-value controversy".对当前“p值争议”的批判性评估。
Biom J. 2017 Sep;59(5):854-872. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700001. Epub 2017 May 15.
6
P values are only an index to evidence: 20th- vs. 21st-century statistical science.P 值只是证据的指标：20 世纪与 21 世纪的统计科学。
Ecology. 2014 Mar;95(3):627-30. doi: 10.1890/13-1066.1.
7
In defense of P values.为 P 值辩护。
Ecology. 2014 Mar;95(3):611-7. doi: 10.1890/13-0590.1.
8
Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics.哲学与贝叶斯统计学实践。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2013 Feb;66(1):8-38. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02037.x. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
Zotero 插件