• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of home visits on quality of life among older adults: a systematic review protocol.家庭访视对老年人生活质量的影响:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 6;10(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01862-8.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based, nurse-led health promotion for older people: a systematic review.基于家庭的、由护士主导的老年人健康促进的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(20):1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta16200.
4
Supported self-management for patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): an evidence synthesis and economic analysis.中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的支持性自我管理:证据综合与经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 May;19(36):1-516. doi: 10.3310/hta19360.
5
Effectiveness of home visit nursing for improving patient-related clinical outcomes in older people: an umbrella review protocol.家庭访视护理对改善老年人相关临床结局的有效性:伞式评价方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Aug 1;20(8):2071-2078. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00343.
6
Effectiveness of pharmacist home visits for individuals at risk of medication-related problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.药师上门服务对有药物相关问题风险的个体的效果:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 15;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4728-3.
7
Fall prevention interventions for older community-dwelling adults: systematic reviews on benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.老年人社区居住者防跌倒干预措施:基于获益、危害和患者价值观与偏好的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 9;10(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01572-7.
8
Comparison of telecardiac rehabilitation with centre-based cardiac rehabilitation and usual care: a protocol for systematic review including a meta-analysis.电话心脏康复与中心基础心脏康复及常规护理的比较:系统评价包括荟萃分析的方案。
Open Heart. 2022 Aug;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002018.
9
Community-based care for the specialized management of heart failure: an evidence-based analysis.基于社区的心力衰竭专科管理:一项循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(17):1-42. Epub 2009 Nov 1.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Elderly School Policy on Quality of Life among Thailand's Senior Citizens: A Propensity Score Matching Approach.老年学校政策对泰国老年人生活质量的影响:倾向得分匹配法
F1000Res. 2025 Mar 31;13:735. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.151221.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Epidemiological survey of anterior segment diseases in Japanese isolated island using a portable slit-lamp device in home-based cases in Miyako Island.使用便携式裂隙灯设备对宫古岛居家病例进行日本离岛眼前段疾病的流行病学调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 25;19(11):e0306845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306845. eCollection 2024.
3
Transitional Care Program in Reducing Acute Hospital Utilization in Singapore.新加坡减少急性医院使用的过渡性护理计划。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 28;12(21):2144. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212144.
4
Effects of a nurse-led structured home visiting program on quality of life and adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients.护士主导的结构化家庭访视方案对血液透析患者生活质量和治疗依从性的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;11:1013019. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1013019. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Palliative care in Malaysia: the need to do much more.马来西亚的缓和医疗:需要做得更多。
Med J Malaysia. 2021 May;76(3):279-283.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
The Malaysian National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2018: Older Persons' Health in Malaysia.《2018年马来西亚全国健康与发病率调查:马来西亚老年人的健康状况》
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Dec;20 Suppl 2:5-6. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14112.
4
An overview of the methodology and general findings from the National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2018: Older persons' health in Malaysia.2018 年全国健康和发病率调查(NHMS)方法学和总体发现概述:马来西亚老年人健康状况。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Dec;20 Suppl 2:7-15. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14094.
5
Quality of life and its associated factors among older persons in Malaysia.马来西亚老年人的生活质量及其相关因素。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Dec;20 Suppl 2:92-97. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13961.
6
Home Visits Improve Attitudes and Self-Efficacy: A Longitudinal Curriculum for Residents.家庭访视改善态度和自我效能:住院医师的纵向课程。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):852-858. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16390. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
7
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
8
The Effects of Preventive Home Visits on Older People's Use of Health Care and Social Services and Related Costs.预防性家访对老年人医疗保健和社会服务的使用及其相关费用的影响。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Jul 13;75(8):1586-1593. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz139.
9
Effects of preventive home visits on health-related quality-of-life and mortality in home-dwelling older adults.预防性家访对居家老年人健康相关生活质量和死亡率的影响。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Mar;37(1):90-97. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1569372. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
When continuous outcomes are measured using different scales: guide for meta-analysis and interpretation.当连续结果使用不同的量表进行测量时:荟萃分析和解释指南。
BMJ. 2019 Jan 22;364:k4817. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4817.

家庭访视对老年人生活质量的影响:系统评价方案。

Effects of home visits on quality of life among older adults: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, 40170, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 6;10(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01862-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-021-01862-8
PMID:34872589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8650292/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Home visiting services for older adults have been offered for decades to maintain and promote health and independent functioning, thus enhancing quality of life. Previous systematic reviews have provided a mixed picture of the benefits of home visiting programmes in older adults, primarily because of heterogeneity in study designs, targeted populations, and intervention strategies. These reviews may also become out of date; thus, an updated synthesis of relevant studies is warranted. Our objective is to perform a systematic review of recently published primary studies on the effectiveness of multi-professional home visits on quality of life among older adults.

METHODS

We will perform a comprehensive search for studies investigating the effect of a multi-professional home visit approach on quality of life among older adults. We will conduct the literature search in selected electronic databases and relevant research websites from January 2010 onwards. We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster randomised controlled trials (cluster RCTs), and observational studies that enrolled older adults without dementia over 60 years old, along with studies involving multi-professional preventive-promotive home visit approaches not related to recent hospital discharge. We will report our planned review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We will retrieve and record relevant data in a standardised data extraction form and evaluate the quality of the included articles using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the quality assessment tool for studies with diverse designs (QATSDD). Where appropriate, outcomes will be pooled for meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The main outcomes include quality of life, incidence of falls, depression, dementia, and emergency department admissions.

DISCUSSION

This review may provide evidence for the effectiveness of home visits in improving older adults' quality of life. It will potentially benefit health care professionals, policymakers, and researchers by facilitating the design and delivery of interventions related to older generations and improve service delivery in future.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021234531 .

摘要

背景

几十年来,一直为老年人提供家庭访问服务,以维持和促进健康和独立功能,从而提高生活质量。以前的系统评价对家庭访问计划对老年人健康益处的描述存在差异,主要是因为研究设计、目标人群和干预策略存在异质性。这些综述也可能已经过时;因此,有必要对相关研究进行更新综合。我们的目的是对最近发表的关于多专业家庭访问对老年人生活质量影响的原始研究进行系统评价。

方法

我们将全面搜索研究,调查多专业家庭访问方法对老年人生活质量的影响。我们将从 2010 年 1 月起在选定的电子数据库和相关研究网站上进行文献搜索。我们将纳入随机对照试验(RCT)、整群随机对照试验(cluster RCT)和观察性研究,纳入无痴呆的 60 岁以上老年人,以及涉及多专业预防促进家庭访问方法的研究,与最近出院无关。我们将按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南报告我们计划的综述。我们将检索并记录相关数据在标准化数据提取表中,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和不同设计研究质量评估工具(QATSDD)评估纳入文章的质量。在适当的情况下,将使用随机效应模型对结果进行荟萃分析。主要结局包括生活质量、跌倒发生率、抑郁、痴呆和急诊科入院率。

讨论

该综述可能为家庭访问改善老年人生活质量的有效性提供证据。它将通过促进与老年一代相关的干预措施的设计和实施,并在未来改善服务提供,使卫生保健专业人员、政策制定者和研究人员受益。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42021234531 。