Suppr超能文献

药师上门服务对有药物相关问题风险的个体的效果:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of pharmacist home visits for individuals at risk of medication-related problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Evidence Synthesis Team, PenCLAHRC University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.

Graduate School of Education, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 15;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4728-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication mismanagement is a major cause of both hospital admission and nursing home placement of frail older adults. Medication reviews by community pharmacists aim to maximise therapeutic benefit but also minimise harm. Pharmacist-led medication reviews have been the focus of several systematic reviews, but none have focussed on the home setting.

REVIEW METHODS

To determine the effectiveness of pharmacist home visits for individuals at risk of medication-related problems we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Thirteen databases were searched from inception to December 2018. Forward and backward citation of included studies was also performed. Articles were screened for inclusion independently by two reviewers. Randomised controlled studies of home visits by pharmacists for individuals at risk of medication-related problems were eligible for inclusion. Data extraction and quality appraisal were performed by one reviewer and checked by a second. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed where sufficient data allowed and narrative synthesis summarised all remaining data.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs (reported in 15 articles), involving 3410 participants, were included in the review. The frequency, content and purpose of the home visit varied considerably. The data from eight trials were suitable for meta-analysis of the effects on hospital admissions and mortality, and from three trials for the effects on quality of life. Overall there was no evidence of reduction in hospital admissions (risk ratio (RR) of 1.01 (95%CI 0.86 to 1.20, I = 69.0%, p = 0.89; 8 studies, 2314 participants)), or mortality (RR of 1.01 (95%CI 0.81 to 1.26, I = 0%, p = 0.94; 8 studies, 2314 participants)). There was no consistent evidence of an effect on quality of life, medication adherence or knowledge.

CONCLUSION

A systematic review of twelve RCTs assessing the impact of pharmacist home visits for individuals at risk of medication related problems found no evidence of effect on hospital admission or mortality rates, and limited evidence of effect on quality of life. Future studies should focus on using more robust methods to assess relevant outcomes.

摘要

背景

药物管理不当是导致体弱老年人住院和入住养老院的主要原因。社区药剂师进行药物审查旨在最大限度地提高治疗效果,同时最大限度地减少伤害。药剂师主导的药物审查已成为多项系统评价的重点,但没有一项专门针对家庭环境。

方法

为了确定药剂师上门服务对有药物相关问题风险的个人的有效性,我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。从成立到 2018 年 12 月,我们对 13 个数据库进行了搜索。还对纳入研究进行了前向和后向引文搜索。文章由两名审查员独立筛选纳入。符合条件的研究包括对有药物相关问题风险的个人进行上门服务的药剂师的随机对照研究。由一名审查员进行数据提取和质量评估,由另一名审查员进行检查。在有足够数据的情况下进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并对所有剩余数据进行了叙述性综合。

结果

共有 12 项 RCT(在 15 篇文章中报道),涉及 3410 名参与者,被纳入本综述。上门访问的频率、内容和目的差异很大。八项试验的数据适合于医院入院和死亡率的影响的荟萃分析,三项试验的数据适合于生活质量的影响的荟萃分析。总体而言,没有证据表明住院人数减少(入院率的风险比(RR)为 1.01(95%CI 0.86 至 1.20,I=69.0%,p=0.89;8 项研究,2314 名参与者)),或死亡率(RR 为 1.01(95%CI 0.81 至 1.26,I=0%,p=0.94;8 项研究,2314 名参与者))。没有一致的证据表明对生活质量、药物依从性或知识有影响。

结论

对评估药剂师上门服务对有药物相关问题风险的个人影响的 12 项 RCT 进行的系统评价发现,对住院率或死亡率没有影响的证据,对生活质量的影响证据有限。未来的研究应专注于使用更可靠的方法来评估相关结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0259/6961241/7dc008d05e2b/12913_2019_4728_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验