Suppr超能文献

老年护理工作者对远程护理机器人的看法出现积极转变。

Positive Turn in Elder-Care Workers' Views Toward Telecare Robots.

作者信息

Turja Tuuli, Taipale Sakari, Niemelä Marketta, Oinas Tomi

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Kalevantie 5, 33014 Tampere, Finland.

University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Soc Robot. 2022;14(4):931-944. doi: 10.1007/s12369-021-00841-2. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

Abstract

Robots have been slowly but steadily introduced to welfare sectors. Our previous observations based on a large-scale survey study on Finnish elder-care workers in 2016 showed that while robots were perceived to be useful in certain telecare tasks, using robots may also prove to be incompatible with the care workers' personal values. The current study presents the second wave of the survey data from 2020, with the same respondents (N = 190), and shows how these views have changed for the positive, including higher expectations of telecare robotization and decreased concerns over care robots' compatibility with personal values. In a longitudinal analysis (Phase 1), the positive change in views toward telecare robots was found to be influenced by the care robots' higher value compatibility. In an additional cross-sectional analysis (Phase 2), focusing on the factors underlying personal values, care robots' value compatibility was associated with social norms toward care robots, the threat of technological unemployment, and COVID-19 stress. The significance of social norms in robot acceptance came down to more universal ethical standards of care work rather than shared norms in the workplace. COVID-19 stress did not explain the temporal changes in views about robot use in care but had a role in assessments of the compatibility between personal values and care robot use. In conclusion, for care workers to see potential in care robots, the new technology must support ethical standards of care work, such as respectfulness, compassion, and trustworthiness of the nurse-patient interaction. In robotizing care work, personal values are significant predictors of the task values.

摘要

机器人已逐渐但稳步地被引入福利领域。我们之前基于2016年对芬兰老年护理工作者的大规模调查研究得出的观察结果表明,虽然人们认为机器人在某些远程护理任务中有用,但使用机器人也可能与护理人员的个人价值观不相容。当前的研究展示了2020年第二轮调查数据,调查对象相同(N = 190),并表明这些观点已朝着积极方向转变,包括对远程护理机器人化的更高期望以及对护理机器人与个人价值观兼容性的担忧减少。在纵向分析(第一阶段)中,发现对远程护理机器人看法的积极变化受到护理机器人更高的价值兼容性的影响。在另一项横断面分析(第二阶段)中,聚焦于个人价值观背后的因素,护理机器人的价值兼容性与对护理机器人的社会规范、技术失业的威胁以及新冠疫情压力相关。社会规范在机器人接受度方面的重要性归结为护理工作更普遍的道德标准,而非工作场所的共享规范。新冠疫情压力并未解释对护理中机器人使用看法的时间变化,但在评估个人价值观与护理机器人使用之间的兼容性方面起到了作用。总之,为了让护理人员看到护理机器人的潜力,新技术必须支持护理工作的道德标准,如护士与患者互动中的尊重、同情和可信赖性。在护理工作的机器人化过程中,个人价值观是任务价值的重要预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32dd/8636069/74d6a676a697/12369_2021_841_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Positive Turn in Elder-Care Workers' Views Toward Telecare Robots.
Int J Soc Robot. 2022;14(4):931-944. doi: 10.1007/s12369-021-00841-2. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
2
Affective Attitudes Toward Robots at Work: A Population-Wide Four-Wave Survey Study.
Int J Soc Robot. 2022;14(6):1379-1395. doi: 10.1007/s12369-022-00877-y. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
3
Uncertainties about accepting care robots.
Front Digit Health. 2023 May 18;5:1092974. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1092974. eCollection 2023.
5
The Influence of Robots' Fairness on Humans' Reward-Punishment Behaviors and Trust in Human-Robot Cooperative Teams.
Hum Factors. 2024 Apr;66(4):1103-1117. doi: 10.1177/00187208221133272. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
6
The adoption of care robots in home care-A survey on the attitudes of Finnish home care personnel.
J Clin Nurs. 2018 May;27(9-10):1846-1859. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14355.
7
Attitudes and reactions to a healthcare robot.
Telemed J E Health. 2010 Jun;16(5):608-13. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0171.
8
Providing Aging Adults Social Robots' Companionship in Home-Based Elder Care.
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Jun 4;2019:2726837. doi: 10.1155/2019/2726837. eCollection 2019.
9
Identifying Features that Enhance Older Adults' Acceptance of Robots: A Mixed Methods Study.
Gerontology. 2019;65(4):441-450. doi: 10.1159/000494881. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Overview of barriers to healthcare access: Medical deserts and individual sandboxes.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jul;14(7):2608-2612. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1903_24. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
2
It is a matter of convenience: why welfare technologies have become domesticated in Swedish eldercare.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 10;24(1):1558. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11924-x.
3
Ethical implications in using robots among older adults living with dementia.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 25;15:1436273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1436273. eCollection 2024.
5
Uncertainties about accepting care robots.
Front Digit Health. 2023 May 18;5:1092974. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1092974. eCollection 2023.
6
Hopes and fears regarding care robots: Content analysis of newspapers in East Asia and Western Europe, 2001-2020.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Dec 8;3:1019089. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1019089. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Illegitimate tasks in health care: Illegitimate task types and associations with occupational well-being.
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jul;30(13-14):2093-2106. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15767. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
2
Designing Futuristic Telemedicine Using Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in the COVID-19 Era.
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 2;8:556789. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.556789. eCollection 2020.
3
Exploring perceptions toward home-care robots for older people in Finland, Ireland, and Japan: A comparative questionnaire study.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Nov/Dec;91:104178. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104178. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Impacts of robot implementation on care personnel and clients in elderly-care institutions.
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Feb;134:104041. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104041. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
6
The concept of welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare.
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 May;43(9):1220-1227. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1661035. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
8
Finnish healthcare professionals' attitudes towards robots: Reflections on a population sample.
Nurs Open. 2018 Mar 23;5(3):300-309. doi: 10.1002/nop2.138. eCollection 2018 Jul.
9
Health Care Robotics: Qualitative Exploration of Key Challenges and Future Directions.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 4;20(7):e10410. doi: 10.2196/10410.
10
Calling to Nursing: Concept Analysis.
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2017 Oct/Dec;40(4):384-394. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000185.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验