• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾驶舱语音记录器抄本数据:记录历史性航空事故中的安全语音与安全监听情况。

Cockpit voice recorder transcript data: Capturing safety voice and safety listening during historic aviation accidents.

作者信息

Noort Mark C, Reader Tom W, Gillespie Alex

机构信息

Leiden University, Law School, the Netherland.

London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Data Brief. 2021 Nov 20;39:107602. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107602. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2021.107602
PMID:34877377
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8627982/
Abstract

Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) transcripts capture audio data within cockpit environments. This aids the investigation of causal factors contributing to aviation accidents by revealing communication and other sounds prior to aviation accidents. This dataset contains 172 unique CVR transcripts (with 21,626 lines of transcript: averaging: 106.001 conversational turns; SD = 51.727, range: 1-641), and capturing approximately 15% of historic aviation fatalities in commercial and corporate aviation between 1962 and 2018. CVR transcripts involved airlines registered across 42 countries, with accidents occurring across 50 countries. The dataset was compiled by extracting CVR transcripts from three primary data sources and excluding duplicate and non-English entries. The data contains variables describing the (i) raw data, (ii) content and characteristics of the CVR transcripts, and (iii) behaviours coded by research assistants in support of the associated research article. The data existed of conversational turns amongst flight crew (total = 19,393; within transcripts:  = 112.750; SD = 124.829) and other data ( = 2213; within transcripts:  = 12.866; SD = 14.452; e.g., background sounds, transcriber notes). Conversational turns were uttered by junior (39.00%) and senior (35.44%) flight crew, and others (25.56%). The dataset enables future research through providing the first integrated dataset on communication behaviours prior to historic aviation accidents. Moreover, the dataset may support safety management through enabling the identification of communication behaviours contributing to accidents and the design of novel interventions. This data-in-brief is a co-submission associated with the research article: M. C. Noort, T.W. Reader, A. Gillespie. (2021). Safety voice and safety listening during aviation accidents: Cockpit voice recordings reveal that speaking-up to power is not enough. Safety Science.

摘要

驾驶舱语音记录器(CVR)的文字记录捕捉驾驶舱环境中的音频数据。通过揭示航空事故发生前的通信和其他声音,这有助于调查导致航空事故的因果因素。该数据集包含172份独特的CVR文字记录(共21626行文字记录:平均106.001个对话轮次;标准差=51.727,范围:1 - 641),涵盖了1962年至2018年期间商业和企业航空领域约15%的历史性航空死亡事故。CVR文字记录涉及42个国家注册的航空公司,事故发生在50个国家。该数据集是通过从三个主要数据源提取CVR文字记录并排除重复和非英语条目而编制的。数据包含描述(i)原始数据、(ii)CVR文字记录的内容和特征以及(iii)研究助理为支持相关研究文章而编码的行为的变量。数据包括机组人员之间的对话轮次(总计19393个;在文字记录中:平均值=112.750;标准差=124.829)和其他数据(平均值=2213;在文字记录中:平均值=12.866;标准差=14.452;例如,背景声音、抄写员注释)。对话轮次由初级(39.00%)和高级(35.44%)机组人员以及其他人员(25.56%)说出。该数据集通过提供关于历史性航空事故前通信行为的首个综合数据集,为未来研究提供了便利。此外,该数据集可通过识别导致事故的通信行为和设计新颖的干预措施来支持安全管理。本数据简报是与研究文章共同提交的:M.C.诺尔特、T.W.里德、A.吉莱斯皮。(2021年)。航空事故中的安全发声与安全倾听:驾驶舱语音记录显示仅向上级表达意见是不够的。《安全科学》。

相似文献

1
Cockpit voice recorder transcript data: Capturing safety voice and safety listening during historic aviation accidents.驾驶舱语音记录器抄本数据:记录历史性航空事故中的安全语音与安全监听情况。
Data Brief. 2021 Nov 20;39:107602. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107602. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Sounds of silence: Data for analysing muted safety voice in speech.寂静之声:用于分析言语中被压制的安全声音的数据。
Data Brief. 2021 May 30;37:107186. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107186. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Cockpit-cabin communication: II. Shall we tell the pilots?驾驶舱与客舱通信:II. 我们要告诉飞行员吗?
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1996;6(3):211-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0603_1.
4
Parallels in safety between aviation and healthcare.航空与医疗保健在安全方面的相似之处。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 May;53(5):875-878. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
5
Mortality experience of cockpit crewmembers from Japan Airlines.日本航空公司驾驶舱机组人员的死亡率情况。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1993 Aug;64(8):748-50.
6
The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation.商业航空中机组资源管理培训的发展历程。
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1999;9(1):19-32. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0901_2.
7
An analysis of human factors in fifty controlled flight into terrain aviation accidents from 2007 to 2017.对 2007 年至 2017 年五十起可控飞行撞地航空事故中人的因素的分析。
J Safety Res. 2019 Jun;69:155-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
8
How effective is cockpit resource management training? Exploring issues in evaluating the impact of programs to enhance crew coordination.驾驶舱资源管理培训的效果如何?探讨评估旨在加强机组人员协作的培训项目影响时存在的问题。
Flight Saf Dig. 1990 May;9(5):1-17.
9
Human error and crew resource management failures in Naval aviation mishaps: a review of U.S. Naval Safety Center data, 1990-96.海军航空事故中的人为失误与机组资源管理故障:对美国海军安全中心1990 - 1996年数据的回顾
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Dec;70(12):1147-51.
10
Crew resource management: a simulator study comparing fixed versus formed aircrews.机组资源管理:一项比较固定机组与编队机组的模拟器研究。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996 Jan;67(1):3-7.