Suppr超能文献

一项关于勃起功能障碍与中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及血小板与淋巴细胞比值之间关系的系统评价和荟萃分析。

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between erectile dysfunction and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios.

机构信息

Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Institute of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

出版信息

Andrologia. 2022 Apr;54(3):e14337. doi: 10.1111/and.14337. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

Abstract

Several studies were conducted to explore the association between haematological parameters and erectile dysfunction (ED), but the conclusions were contradictory with small sample size. The extensively search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of science from inception to August 2021. Studies comparing the haematological parameter (at least NLR, PLR) between ED patients and healthy controls were eligible for the present meta-analysis. The differences in NLR and PLR between ED patients and healthy controls were assessed by calculating the standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Eventually, 7 studies were remained for our meta-analysis, with a total of 929 ED patients and 737 healthy controls. For the methodological quality based on NOS, 5 studies were of high quality, scored 7, and 8. 2 studies were of moderate quality, scored 6. There were statistically significant differences in NLR values between ED patients and healthy controls, based on the pooled results (SMD: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.24-0.82). Pooled results from the 6 studies revealed that ED patients had higher PLR values than healthy controls (SMD: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.12-1.28). Our meta-analysis solidly confirmed the association between NLR, PLR and ED. Increased NLR and PLR should be independent risk factors for ED.

摘要

有几项研究探讨了血液学参数与勃起功能障碍(ED)之间的关系,但由于样本量小,结论相互矛盾。本研究从建库到 2021 年 8 月,在 PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 中进行了广泛的检索。本荟萃分析纳入了比较 ED 患者和健康对照组血液学参数(至少 NLR、PLR)的研究。通过计算标准化均数差(SMD)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)来评估 ED 患者和健康对照组之间 NLR 和 PLR 的差异。最终,我们的荟萃分析纳入了 7 项研究,共纳入 929 例 ED 患者和 737 例健康对照者。根据 NOS 进行的方法学质量评估,5 项研究质量较高,评分为 7 分和 8 分,2 项研究质量中等,评分为 6 分。基于荟萃分析结果,ED 患者与健康对照组 NLR 值存在统计学差异(SMD:0.53,95%CI:0.24-0.82)。来自 6 项研究的汇总结果显示,ED 患者的 PLR 值高于健康对照组(SMD:0.70,95%CI:0.12-1.28)。本荟萃分析确凿地证实了 NLR、PLR 与 ED 之间的关系。升高的 NLR 和 PLR 应该是 ED 的独立危险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验