• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

擦取采样对旧石器时代骨表面微观形貌的蛋白质组学分析的影响。

The effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on Palaeolithic bone surface microtopography.

机构信息

Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Anthropology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 8;11(1):23611. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02823-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-02823-w
PMID:34880290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8655045/
Abstract

Bone surface modifications are crucial for understanding human subsistence and dietary behaviour, and can inform about the techniques employed in the production and use of bone tools. Permission to destructively sample such unique artefacts is not always granted. The recent development of non-destructive proteomic extraction techniques has provided some alternatives for the analysis of rare and culturally significant artefacts, including bone tools and personal ornaments. The Eraser Extraction Method (EEM), first developed for ZooMS analysis of parchment, has recently been applied to bone and ivory specimens. To test the potential impact of the EEM on ancient bone surfaces, we analyse six anthropogenically modified Palaeolithic bone specimens from Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria) through a controlled sampling experiment using qualitative and 3D quantitative microscopy. Although the overall bone topography is generally preserved, our findings demonstrate a slight flattening of the microtopography alongside the formation of micro-striations associated with the use of the eraser for all bone specimens. Such modifications are similar to ancient use-wear traces. We therefore consider the EEM a destructive sampling approach for Palaeolithic bone surfaces. Together with low ZooMS success rates in some of the reported studies, the EEM might not be a suitable approach to taxonomically identify Pleistocene bone specimens.

摘要

骨表面的改造对于理解人类的生存和饮食行为至关重要,并且可以提供有关生产和使用骨工具所采用技术的信息。并非总是允许破坏这些独特文物进行采样。最近,非破坏性蛋白质组学提取技术的发展为分析稀有和具有文化意义的文物(包括骨工具和个人饰品)提供了一些替代方法。橡皮擦提取法(EEM)最初是为皮纸的 ZooMS 分析而开发的,最近已应用于骨骼和象牙标本。为了测试 EEM 对古代骨表面的潜在影响,我们通过使用定性和 3D 定量显微镜进行的受控采样实验,分析了来自 Bacho Kiro 洞穴(保加利亚)的六个人为改造的旧石器时代骨骼标本。尽管总体骨地形通常得以保留,但我们的发现表明,在所有骨骼标本上,橡皮擦的使用会导致微地形略微变平,并形成微条纹,这类似于古代的使用痕迹。因此,我们认为 EEM 是一种对旧石器时代骨表面进行破坏性采样的方法。与一些报道的研究中 ZooMS 成功率较低相结合,EEM 可能不是一种适合分类鉴定更新世骨骼标本的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb25/8655045/235a0110804e/41598_2021_2823_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb25/8655045/db0cd7e17709/41598_2021_2823_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb25/8655045/70905ae1f5e6/41598_2021_2823_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb25/8655045/2a4bdebe9970/41598_2021_2823_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb25/8655045/cfa576ad9239/41598_2021_2823_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb25/8655045/235a0110804e/41598_2021_2823_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb25/8655045/db0cd7e17709/41598_2021_2823_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb25/8655045/70905ae1f5e6/41598_2021_2823_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb25/8655045/2a4bdebe9970/41598_2021_2823_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb25/8655045/cfa576ad9239/41598_2021_2823_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb25/8655045/235a0110804e/41598_2021_2823_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on Palaeolithic bone surface microtopography.擦取采样对旧石器时代骨表面微观形貌的蛋白质组学分析的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 8;11(1):23611. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02823-w.
2
Initial Upper Paleolithic bone technology and personal ornaments at Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria).巴乔基罗洞穴(保加利亚)的旧石器时代早期骨器技术和个人饰品。
J Hum Evol. 2022 Jun;167:103198. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2022.103198. Epub 2022 May 6.
3
Initial Upper Palaeolithic Homo sapiens from Bacho Kiro Cave, Bulgaria.保加利亚巴乔基罗洞穴的早期旧石器时代智人。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7808):299-302. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2259-z. Epub 2020 May 11.
4
Subsistence behavior during the Initial Upper Paleolithic in Europe: Site use, dietary practice, and carnivore exploitation at Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria).欧洲旧石器时代初期的生计行为:巴赫科基罗洞穴(保加利亚)的遗址利用、饮食实践和食肉动物利用。
J Hum Evol. 2021 Dec;161:103074. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103074. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
5
A C chronology for the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition at Bacho Kiro Cave, Bulgaria.保加利亚 Bacho Kiro 洞穴中、上旧石器时代过渡期的 C 年代测定。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Jun;4(6):794-801. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1136-3. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Combining traceological analysis and ZooMS on Early Neolithic bone artefacts from the cave of Coro Trasito, NE Iberian Peninsula: Cervidae used equally to Caprinae.结合痕迹分析和 ZooMS 对来自伊比利亚半岛东北部 Coro Trasito 洞穴的新石器时代早期骨制品的研究:鹿类和羊类被同等利用。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 10;19(7):e0306448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306448. eCollection 2024.
7
Identifying Archaeological Bone via Non-Destructive ZooMS and the Materiality of Symbolic Expression: Examples from Iroquoian Bone Points.通过非破坏性的 ZooMS 技术识别考古骨骼与象征表达的物质性:以易洛魁骨矛头为例。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 30;9(1):11027. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47299-x.
8
Integrating ZooMS and zooarchaeology: New data from the Uluzzian levels of Uluzzo C Rock Shelter, Roccia San Sebastiano cave and Riparo del Broion.整合 ZooMS 和动物考古学:来自 Uluzzian 层的新数据,Uluzzo C 岩棚、Roccia San Sebastiano 洞穴和 Riparo del Broion。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0275614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275614. eCollection 2022.
9
New insights into the Upper Palaeolithic of the Caucasus through the study of personal ornaments. Teeth and bones pendants from Satsurblia and Dzudzuana caves (Imereti, Georgia).通过对个人饰品的研究揭示南高加索旧石器时代晚期的新面貌——来自格鲁吉亚伊梅列季州的萨特布里亚和祖杜占纳洞穴的牙齿和骨头吊坠。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0258974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258974. eCollection 2021.
10
Ancient human DNA recovered from a Palaeolithic pendant.从旧石器时代的吊坠中提取到的古人类 DNA。
Nature. 2023 Jun;618(7964):328-332. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06035-2. Epub 2023 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Clothomics: a practical guide to understand the opportunities and challenges of omics-based methods in archaeological cloth research.织物组学:理解基于组学方法在考古织物研究中的机遇与挑战的实用指南。
NPJ Herit Sci. 2025;13(1):80. doi: 10.1038/s40494-025-01623-z. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
Cervidae antlers exploited to manufacture prehistoric tools and hunting implements as a reliable source of ancient DNA.鹿科动物的鹿角被用于制造史前工具和狩猎器具,作为古代DNA的可靠来源。
Heliyon. 2024 May 24;10(11):e31858. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31858. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Subsistence behavior during the Initial Upper Paleolithic in Europe: Site use, dietary practice, and carnivore exploitation at Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria).欧洲旧石器时代初期的生计行为:巴赫科基罗洞穴(保加利亚)的遗址利用、饮食实践和食肉动物利用。
J Hum Evol. 2021 Dec;161:103074. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103074. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
2
Girding the loins? Direct evidence of the use of a medieval English parchment birthing girdle from biomolecular analysis.束腰?通过生物分子分析直接证明中世纪英国羊皮纸分娩束腰的使用。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Mar 10;8(3):202055. doi: 10.1098/rsos.202055.
3
Selection preferences for animal species used in bone-tool-manufacturing strategies in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省骨制工具制造策略中动物物种选择偏好。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249296. eCollection 2021.
4
Palaeoproteomics confirm earliest domesticated sheep in southern Africa ca. 2000 BP.古蛋白质组学证实,大约在 2000 年前的南非,绵羊就已经被最早家养化了。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 23;11(1):6631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85756-8.
5
Initial Upper Palaeolithic Homo sapiens from Bacho Kiro Cave, Bulgaria.保加利亚巴乔基罗洞穴的早期旧石器时代智人。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7808):299-302. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2259-z. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
A C chronology for the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition at Bacho Kiro Cave, Bulgaria.保加利亚 Bacho Kiro 洞穴中、上旧石器时代过渡期的 C 年代测定。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Jun;4(6):794-801. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1136-3. Epub 2020 May 11.
7
Non-destructive ZooMS identification reveals strategic bone tool raw material selection by Neandertals.无损 ZooMS 鉴定揭示尼安德特人对战略性骨制工具原料的选择。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 8;10(1):7746. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64358-w.
8
Combining ZooMS and zooarchaeology to study Late Pleistocene hominin behaviour at Fumane (Italy).运用蛋白质组学和动物考古学研究意大利富马尼遗址晚更新世人类行为。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 26;9(1):12350. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48706-z.
9
Identifying Archaeological Bone via Non-Destructive ZooMS and the Materiality of Symbolic Expression: Examples from Iroquoian Bone Points.通过非破坏性的 ZooMS 技术识别考古骨骼与象征表达的物质性:以易洛魁骨矛头为例。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 30;9(1):11027. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47299-x.
10
Identifying animal taxa used to manufacture bone tools during the Middle Stone Age at Sibudu, South Africa: Results of a CT-rendered histological analysis.鉴定南非 Sibudu 中石器时代用于制造骨工具的动物分类群:CT 渲染组织学分析的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 29;13(11):e0208319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208319. eCollection 2018.