• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩文版ConCom安全管理量表的效度与信度

Validity and Reliability of a Korean Version of the ConCom Safety Management Scale.

作者信息

Kwon Mi Young, Kim Nam Yi

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Gimcheon University, Gimcheon 39528, Korea.

College of Nursing, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 27;18(23):12514. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312514.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182312514
PMID:34886239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8656705/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the ConCom Safety Management Scale (K-CCSMS). This study consisted of two phases. First, in accordance with the guidelines of the World Health Organization, the Korean version of the scale was developed in five stages. Second, data from 206 general and tertiary hospital nurses were analyzed to confirm the validity and reliability of the K-CCSMS; thus, the construct validity, criterion-related validity, and reliability were confirmed. In total, 21 items divided across four factors (i.e., stressing the importance of safety rules and monitoring, providing employees with feedback, showing role modeling behavior, and creating safety awareness) were identified through exploratory factor analysis. Three items were deleted through confirmatory factor analysis, and the model fit was as follows: normed χ = 2.80, normed fit index = 0.87, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.90, comparative fit index = 0.92, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.05. The correlation coefficient between the K-CCSMS and patient safety culture was 0.76 ( < 0.001), and internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.95). For patient safety, an appropriate combination of control- and commitment-based management is required, and the 18-item K-CCSMS showed usefulness and reliability in determining such a balance and evaluating the leadership styles of Korean nursing managers.

摘要

本研究的目的是验证韩文版《ConCom安全管理量表》(K-CCSMS)的有效性和可靠性。本研究包括两个阶段。首先,按照世界卫生组织的指导方针,该量表的韩文版分五个阶段编制。其次,对来自206名综合医院和三级医院护士的数据进行分析,以确认K-CCSMS的有效性和可靠性;因此,证实了其结构效度、效标关联效度和信度。通过探索性因素分析,共确定了21个项目,分为四个因素(即强调安全规则的重要性和监督、向员工提供反馈、展示榜样行为以及树立安全意识)。通过验证性因素分析删除了三个项目,模型拟合情况如下:标准化χ=2.80,规范拟合指数=0.87,塔克-刘易斯指数=0.90,比较拟合指数=0.92,标准化均方根残差=0.05。K-CCSMS与患者安全文化之间的相关系数为0.76(<0.001),内部一致性可接受(克朗巴哈α系数=0.95)。对于患者安全,需要将基于控制和基于承诺的管理进行适当结合,18项的K-CCSMS在确定这种平衡以及评估韩国护理管理者的领导风格方面显示出实用性和可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7517/8656705/0c9d285c39b5/ijerph-18-12514-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7517/8656705/0c9d285c39b5/ijerph-18-12514-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7517/8656705/0c9d285c39b5/ijerph-18-12514-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of a Korean Version of the ConCom Safety Management Scale.韩文版ConCom安全管理量表的效度与信度
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 27;18(23):12514. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312514.
2
The ConCom Safety Management Scale: developing and testing a measurement instrument for control-based and commitment-based safety management approaches in hospitals.《联合委员会安全管理量表》:开发和测试一种针对基于控制和基于承诺的医院安全管理方法的测量工具。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Oct;27(10):807-817. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007162. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale.《护理职业自我效能量表》韩文版的心理测量学特性。
J Nurs Res. 2022 Feb 21;30(2):e197. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000481.
4
Translations and psychometric validation of the Korean version of the Nursing Teamwork Survey.《护理团队协作调查问卷》韩文版的翻译及心理测量学验证
Res Nurs Health. 2023 Apr;46(2):242-250. doi: 10.1002/nur.22297. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
5
Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module.世界卫生组织生活质量量表-老年人模块韩国版的有效性和可靠性。
Geriatr Nurs. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(2):548-554. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
6
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale.《整体护理能力量表韩国版的有效性和可靠性》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(12):7244. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127244.
7
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Paternal Postnatal Attachment Scale.《父亲产后依恋量表(韩文版)的有效性和可靠性》。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2023 May;17(2):102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
8
Validity and Reliability of the CarGOQoL Questionnaire Among Informal Caregivers of Patients With Cancer.癌症患者非专业照护者 CarGOQoL 问卷的有效性和可靠性。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231179841. doi: 10.1177/00469580231179841.
9
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Trauma-Informed Climate Scale-10.韩文版创伤知情环境量表-10的效度与信度
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2024 Dec;18(5):460-467. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2024.10.002. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
10
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Watson Caritas Patient Score.韩文版沃森关爱患者评分的效度与信度
J Nurs Res. 2020 Apr;28(2):e80. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000351.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Infertility Public Stigma Scale for Japanese women: protocol for an exploratory sequential mixed method study of the Japanese population.日本女性不孕症公众污名量表的编制与心理测量学评价:一项针对日本人群的探索性序贯混合方法研究方案
Front Public Health. 2025 May 21;13:1504842. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1504842. eCollection 2025.
2
Development of the Japanese Version of the Infertility Stigma Scale: Examination of Its Reliability and Validity.《不孕症污名量表日语版的编制:信效度检验》
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 9;10(3):505. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030505.

本文引用的文献

1
[Validity and Reliability of a Korean Version of Yale Food Addiction Scale for Children (YFAS-C)].[儿童版耶鲁食物成瘾量表(YFAS-C)韩文版的效度与信度]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2019 Feb;49(1):59-68. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2019.49.1.59.
2
The patient safety culture: a systematic review by characteristics of Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture dimensions.患者安全文化:基于患者安全文化维度医院调查特征的系统评价
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Nov 1;30(9):660-677. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy080.
3
The ConCom Safety Management Scale: developing and testing a measurement instrument for control-based and commitment-based safety management approaches in hospitals.
《联合委员会安全管理量表》:开发和测试一种针对基于控制和基于承诺的医院安全管理方法的测量工具。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Oct;27(10):807-817. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007162. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
4
Connecting nursing leadership and patient outcomes: state of the science.连接护理领导力与患者预后:科学现状
J Nurs Manag. 2015 Apr;23(3):275-8. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12307.
5
The nurse executive role in quality and high performing health services.护士管理人员在优质高效医疗服务中的角色。
J Nurs Manag. 2016 Jan;24(1):132-6. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12290. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
6
A review on leadership of head nurses and patient safety and quality of care.
Adv Health Care Manag. 2013;14:3-34. doi: 10.1108/s1474-8231(2013)0000014006.
7
Leadership, safety climate, and continuous quality improvement: impact on process quality and patient safety.领导力、安全氛围与持续质量改进:对流程质量和患者安全的影响。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2015 Jan-Mar;40(1):24-34. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000006.
8
Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework.多层次验证性因素分析框架中的可靠性估计。
Psychol Methods. 2014 Mar;19(1):72-91. doi: 10.1037/a0032138. Epub 2013 May 6.
9
Safety self-efficacy and safety performance: potential antecedents and the moderation effect of standardization.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2007;20(7):572-84. doi: 10.1108/09526860710822716.
10
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.CVI(内容效度指数)是内容效度的可接受指标吗?评估与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199.