Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511.
Department of Neurosciences and Behavior, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil 14049-900.
J Neurosci. 2022 Feb 9;42(6):1035-1053. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1371-20.2021. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
The synaptic balance between excitation and inhibition (E/I balance) is a fundamental principle of cortical circuits, and disruptions in E/I balance are commonly linked to cognitive deficits such as impaired decision-making. Explanatory gaps remain in a mechanistic understanding of how E/I balance contributes to cognitive computations, and how E/I disruptions at the synaptic level can propagate to induce behavioral deficits. Here, we studied how E/I perturbations may impair perceptual decision-making in a biophysically-based association cortical circuit model. We found that both elevating and lowering E/I ratio, via NMDA receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction at inhibitory interneurons and excitatory pyramidal neurons, respectively, can similarly impair psychometric performance, following an inverted-U dependence. Nonetheless, these E/I perturbations differentially alter the process of evidence accumulation across time. Under elevated E/I ratio, decision-making is impulsive, overweighting early evidence and underweighting late evidence. Under lowered E/I ratio, decision-making is indecisive, with both evidence integration and winner-take-all competition weakened. The distinct time courses of evidence accumulation at the circuit level can be measured at the behavioral level, using multiple psychophysical task paradigms which provide dissociable predictions. These results are well captured by a generalized drift-diffusion model (DDM) with self-coupling, implementing leaky or unstable integration, which thereby links biophysical circuit modeling to algorithmic process modeling and facilitates model fitting to behavioral choice data. In general, our findings characterize critical roles of cortical E/I balance in cognitive function, bridging from biophysical to behavioral levels of analysis. Cognitive deficits in multiple neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, have been associated with alterations in the balance of synaptic excitation and inhibition (E/I) in cerebral cortical circuits. However, the circuit mechanisms by which E/I imbalance leads to cognitive deficits in decision-making have remained unclear. We used a computational model of decision-making in cortical circuits to study the neural and behavioral effects of E/I imbalance. We found that elevating and lowering E/I ratio produce distinct modes of dysfunction in decision-making processes, which can be dissociated in behavior through psychophysical task paradigms. The biophysical circuit model can be mapped onto a psychological model of decision-making which can facilitate experimental tests of model predictions.
兴奋与抑制(E/I)平衡是皮质回路的基本原则,E/I 平衡的破坏通常与认知缺陷有关,如决策受损。在 E/I 平衡如何促进认知计算的机制理解以及突触水平的 E/I 破坏如何传播导致行为缺陷方面,仍然存在解释上的差距。在这里,我们研究了 E/I 干扰如何通过生物物理关联皮质电路模型损害感知决策。我们发现,通过抑制性中间神经元和兴奋性锥体神经元的 NMDA 受体(NMDAR)功能低下,分别升高和降低 E/I 比率,都可以类似地损害心理测量性能,呈现出倒 U 型依赖关系。尽管如此,这些 E/I 干扰会以不同的方式改变随时间积累的证据过程。在升高的 E/I 比率下,决策是冲动的,过度重视早期证据,低估晚期证据。在降低的 E/I 比率下,决策犹豫不决,证据整合和胜者通吃竞争都减弱。在电路水平上,证据积累的不同时间过程可以通过使用多个提供可分离预测的心理物理任务范式,在行为水平上进行测量。这些结果与具有自耦合的广义漂移扩散模型(DDM)很好地吻合,该模型实现了漏失或不稳定的整合,从而将生物物理电路建模与算法过程建模联系起来,并促进了模型拟合到行为选择数据。总的来说,我们的发现描述了皮质 E/I 平衡在认知功能中的关键作用,从生物物理水平到行为水平进行了衔接。包括精神分裂症在内的多种神经精神疾病的认知缺陷与大脑皮质电路中突触兴奋和抑制(E/I)平衡的改变有关。然而,E/I 失衡导致决策认知缺陷的电路机制仍不清楚。我们使用皮质电路决策的计算模型来研究 E/I 失衡对决策过程的神经和行为影响。我们发现,升高和降低 E/I 比率会导致决策过程中出现不同的功能障碍模式,这些模式可以通过心理物理任务范式在行为上进行区分。生物物理电路模型可以映射到决策的心理模型上,从而促进对模型预测的实验测试。