Grazia Jocelia, Schuh Randall T, Wheeler Ward C
CNPq Researcher, Department of Zoology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA.
Cladistics. 2008 Dec;24(6):932-976. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00224.x. Epub 2008 Oct 20.
Phylogenetic relationships within the Pentatomoidea are investigated through the coding and analysis of character data derived from morphology and DNA sequences. In total, 135 terminal taxa were investigated, representing most of the major family groups; 84 ingroup taxa are coded for 57 characters in a morphological matrix. As many as 3500 bp of DNA data are adduced for each of 52 terminal taxa, including 44 ingroup taxa, comprising the 18S rRNA, 16S rRNA, 28S rRNA, and COI gene regions. Character data are analysed separately and in the form of a total evidence analysis. Major conclusions of the phylogenetic analysis include: the concept of Urostylididae is restricted to that of earlier authors; the Saileriolinae is raised to family rank and treated as the sister group of all Pentatomoidea exclusive of Urostylididae sensu stricto; a broadly conceived Cydnidae, as recognized by Dolling, 1981, is not supported; the placement of Thaumastellidae within the Pentatomoidea is affirmed and the taxon is recognized at family rank rather than as a subfamily of Cydnidae, although its exact phylogenetic position within the Pentatomoidea remains equivocal; the Parastrachiinae is treated as also including Dismegistus Amyot & Serville and placed within a broadly conceived Corimelaenidae, the latter group being treated at family rank; the family-group taxa Dinidoridae and Tessaratomidae probably represent a monophyletic group, but the recognition of monophyletic subgroups will benefit from additional representation in the sequence data set; and the Lestoniidae is treated as the sister group of the Acanthosomatidae. The Acanthosomatidae and Scutelleridae are consistently recovered as monophyletic. The monophyly of the Pentatomidae appears unequivocal, inclusive of the Aphylinae and Cyrtocorinae, on the basis of morphology, the latter two taxa not being represented in the molecular data set. © The Willi Hennig Society 2008.
通过对源自形态学和DNA序列的特征数据进行编码和分析,研究了盾蝽总科内部的系统发育关系。总共研究了135个终端分类单元,代表了大多数主要的科类群;84个内群分类单元在一个形态学矩阵中针对57个特征进行了编码。为52个终端分类单元中的每一个都收集了多达3500bp的DNA数据,其中包括44个内群分类单元,涵盖18S rRNA、16S rRNA、28S rRNA和COI基因区域。特征数据分别进行了分析,并以总证据分析的形式进行分析。系统发育分析的主要结论包括:长盾蝽科的概念被限定为早期作者所定义的概念;赛勒蝽亚科被提升为科级,并被视为除狭义长盾蝽科之外所有盾蝽总科的姐妹群;1981年多林所认可的广义的土蝽科不成立;盾蝽科在盾蝽总科中的位置得到确认,该分类单元被认定为科级,而非土蝽科的一个亚科,尽管其在盾蝽总科中的确切系统发育位置仍不明确;副蝽亚科也被认为包括迪氏蝽属Amyot & Serville,并被置于广义的缘蝽科内,后者被视为科级分类群;科类群硕蝽科和荔蝽科可能代表一个单系群,但单系亚群的认定将受益于序列数据集中更多的代表性分类单元;并蝽科被视为棘蝽科的姐妹群。棘蝽科和盾蝽科始终被认定为单系群。基于形态学,蝽科的单系性似乎明确无误,包括无叶蝽亚科和弯角蝽亚科,后两个分类单元未包含在分子数据集中。© 威利·亨尼希协会2008年。