• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国一个无家可归者收容所内进行普遍检测以监测 COVID-19:一项前瞻性可行性队列研究。

Monitoring for COVID-19 by universal testing in a homeless shelter in Germany: a prospective feasibility cohort study.

机构信息

Institute of Tropical Medicine and International Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 11;21(1):1241. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06945-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-021-06945-4
PMID:34895157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8665323/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Living conditions in homeless shelters facilitate the transmission of COVID-19. Social determinants and pre-existing health conditions place homeless people at increased risk of severe disease. Described outbreaks in homeless shelters resulted in high proportions of infected residents and staff members. In addition to other infection prevention strategies, regular shelter-wide (universal) testing for COVID-19 may be valuable, depending on the level of community transmission and when resources permit.

METHODS

This was a prospective feasibility cohort study to evaluate universal testing for COVID-19 at a homeless shelter with 106 beds in Berlin, Germany. Co-researchers were recruited from the shelter staff. A PCR analysis of saliva or self-collected nasal/oral swab was performed weekly over a period of 3 weeks in July 2020. Acceptability and implementation barriers were analyzed by process evaluation using mixed methods including evaluation sheets, focus group discussion and a structured questionnaire.

RESULTS

Ninety-three out of 124 (75%) residents were approached to participate in the study. Fifty-one out of the 93 residents (54.8%) gave written informed consent; thus 41.1% (51 out of 124) of all residents were included in the study. Among these, high retention rates (88.9-93.6%) of a weekly respiratory specimen were reached, but repeated collection attempts, as well as assistance were required. Around 48 person-hours were necessary for the sample collection including the preparation of materials. A self-collected nasal/oral swab was considered easier and more hygienic to collect than a saliva specimen. No resident was tested positive by RT-PCR. Language barriers were the main reason for non-participation. Flexibility of sample collection schedules, the use of video and audio materials, and concise written information were the main recommendations of the co-researchers for future implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Voluntary universal testing for COVID-19 is feasible in homeless shelters. Universal testing of high-risk facilities will require flexible approaches, considering the level of the community transmission, the available resources, and the local recommendations. Lack of human resources and laboratory capacity may be a major barrier for implementation of universal testing, requiring adapted approaches compared to standard individual testing. Assisted self-collection of specimens and barrier free communication may facilitate implementation in homeless shelters. Program planning must consider homeless people's needs and life situation, and guarantee confidentiality and autonomy.

摘要

背景

无家可归者收容所的居住条件有利于 COVID-19 的传播。社会决定因素和预先存在的健康状况使无家可归者患重病的风险增加。描述的无家可归者收容所爆发导致受感染的居民和工作人员比例很高。除了其他感染预防策略外,根据社区传播程度和资源允许情况,定期对整个收容所(普遍)进行 COVID-19 检测可能具有价值。

方法

这是一项在德国柏林的一个有 106 张床位的无家可归者收容所进行的 COVID-19 普遍检测的前瞻性可行性队列研究。共同研究人员是从收容所工作人员中招募的。在 2020 年 7 月的三周内,每周对唾液或自我采集的鼻/咽拭子进行一次 PCR 分析。通过使用混合方法(包括评估表、焦点小组讨论和结构化问卷)进行过程评估,分析可接受性和实施障碍。

结果

124 名居民中有 93 名(75%)被邀请参加研究。93 名居民中有 51 名(54.8%)书面同意;因此,共有 41.1%(124 名居民中有 51 名)居民参加了该研究。其中,每周呼吸道标本的高保留率(88.9-93.6%)达到,但需要重复采集尝试和协助。收集样本大约需要 48 个人小时,包括材料准备。自我采集的鼻/咽拭子被认为比唾液标本更容易和更卫生。没有居民通过 RT-PCR 检测呈阳性。语言障碍是不参与的主要原因。共同研究人员的主要建议是为未来的实施提供灵活的样本采集计划、使用视频和音频材料以及简明的书面信息。

结论

在无家可归者收容所自愿进行 COVID-19 普遍检测是可行的。对高风险设施的普遍检测需要根据社区传播程度、可用资源和当地建议采用灵活的方法。人力资源和实验室能力的缺乏可能是普遍检测实施的主要障碍,需要与标准的个体检测相比采用适应的方法。辅助自我采集样本和无障碍沟通可能有助于在无家可归者收容所实施。方案规划必须考虑无家可归者的需求和生活状况,并保证保密性和自主性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da8b/8665492/c3f4860f7d89/12879_2021_6945_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da8b/8665492/c3f4860f7d89/12879_2021_6945_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da8b/8665492/c3f4860f7d89/12879_2021_6945_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Monitoring for COVID-19 by universal testing in a homeless shelter in Germany: a prospective feasibility cohort study.德国一个无家可归者收容所内进行普遍检测以监测 COVID-19:一项前瞻性可行性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 11;21(1):1241. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06945-4.
2
Comparison of four COVID-19 screening strategies to facilitate early case identification within the homeless shelter population: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.比较四种 COVID-19 筛查策略,以在无家可归者收容所人群中尽早发现病例:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Nov 23;21(1):941. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04890-2.
3
Comparison of infection control strategies to reduce COVID-19 outbreaks in homeless shelters in the United States: a simulation study.比较美国收容所内减少 COVID-19 爆发的感染控制策略:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med. 2021 May 7;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01965-y.
4
Factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity in 20 homeless shelters in Toronto, Canada, from April to July 2020: a repeated cross-sectional study.2020 年 4 月至 7 月期间加拿大多伦多 20 家无家可归者收容所中与 SARS-CoV-2 阳性相关的因素:一项重复横断面研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Mar 30;9(1):E302-E308. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200253. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.
5
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Prevalences Among People Experiencing Homelessness and Homelessness Service Staff During Early Community Transmission in Atlanta, Georgia, April-May 2020.2020 年 4 月至 5 月,在美国佐治亚州亚特兰大市社区传播早期,经历无家可归和无家可归者服务人员中的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)流行情况。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2978-e2984. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1340.
6
Shelter Characteristics, Infection Prevention Practices, and Universal Testing for SARS-CoV-2 at Homeless Shelters in 7 US Urban Areas.7 个美国城市的无家可归者收容所的庇护特征、感染预防措施和 SARS-CoV-2 普遍检测。
Am J Public Health. 2021 May;111(5):854-859. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306198. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
COVID-19 Outbreak Among Three Affiliated Homeless Service Sites - King County, Washington, 2020.2020 年,华盛顿州金县三个相关无家可归者服务点的 COVID-19 疫情爆发。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 May 1;69(17):523-526. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6917e2.
8
Implementation of rapid and frequent SARS-CoV2 antigen testing and response in congregate homeless shelters.在群居无家可归者收容所中实施快速且频繁的 SARS-CoV2 抗原检测和应对措施。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 10;17(3):e0264929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264929. eCollection 2022.
9
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
10
Homeless Shelter Characteristics and Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2.无家可归者收容所特征与 SARS-CoV-2 流行情况。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug 17;21(5):1048-1053. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.7.48725.

引用本文的文献

1
Pituitary and COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review.垂体与新冠疫苗接种:一项系统综述
Pituitary. 2024 Dec;27(6):970-985. doi: 10.1007/s11102-024-01402-2. Epub 2024 May 18.
2
Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Influenza and SARS-CoV-2 in Homeless People from Urban Shelters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2023).城市收容所无家可归者中的呼吸道合胞病毒、流感和新型冠状病毒2:系统评价与荟萃分析(2023年)
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2024 Jan 31;5(1):41-79. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia5010004.
3
SARS-CoV-2 incidence, seroprevalence, and COVID-19 vaccination coverage in the homeless population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of novel antigen rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: A living systematic review and meta-analysis.新型 SARS-CoV-2 抗原快速诊断准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Aug 12;18(8):e1003735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003735. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
SARS-Cov-2 prevalence, transmission, health-related outcomes and control strategies in homeless shelters: Systematic review and meta-analysis.无家可归者收容所中新冠病毒的流行情况、传播、健康相关结果及控制策略:系统评价与荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Aug;38:101032. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101032. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
3
Screening of SARS-CoV-2 among homeless people, asylum-seekers and other people living in precarious conditions in Marseille, France, March-April 2020.
SARS-CoV-2 感染率、血清流行率和无家可归人群中的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 10;11:1044788. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1044788. eCollection 2023.
4
Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and access among people experiencing homelessness in Germany: A qualitative interview study.德国无家可归者对 COVID-19 疫苗的接受度和可及性的决定因素:一项定性访谈研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 24;11:1148029. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1148029. eCollection 2023.
5
COVID-19 in the homeless population: a scoping review and meta-analysis examining differences in prevalence, presentation, vaccine hesitancy and government response in the first year of the pandemic.无家可归人群中的 COVID-19:在大流行的第一年,对患病率、表现、疫苗犹豫和政府应对措施方面的差异进行的范围综述和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08037-x.
6
From disgusting and complicated to simple and brilliant: Implementation perspectives and lessons learned from users and rejectors of mail-in SARS-CoV-2 gargle tests.从令人作呕和复杂到简单和出色:邮寄 SARS-CoV-2 漱口测试的使用者和拒绝者的实施观点和经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;10:1024525. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1024525. eCollection 2022.
7
Participatory development and implementation of inclusive digital health communication on COVID-19 with homeless people.与无家可归者共同制定和实施针对 COVID-19 的包容性数字健康传播。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;10:1042677. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1042677. eCollection 2022.
8
COVID-19 prevalence and infection control measures at homeless shelters and hostels in high-income countries: a scoping review.高收入国家无家可归者收容所和旅馆中的 COVID-19 患病率和感染控制措施:范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 15;11(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02089-x.
9
The Homeless People in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Victims of the Strict Pandemic Control Measures of the Government.中国新冠疫情期间的无家可归者:政府严格疫情防控措施的受害者。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 12;9:679429. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.679429. eCollection 2021.
2020年3月至4月在法国马赛对无家可归者、寻求庇护者及其他生活条件不稳定者进行的新型冠状病毒2检测。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.026. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
4
Seroprevalence and risk factors of exposure to COVID-19 in homeless people in Paris, France: a cross-sectional study.法国巴黎无家可归者中 COVID-19 的血清流行率和暴露风险因素:一项横断面研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Apr;6(4):e202-e209. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00001-3. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
5
Testing, infection and complication rates of COVID-19 among people with a recent history of homelessness in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study.在加拿大安大略省,有近期无家可归史的人群中 COVID-19 的检测、感染和并发症发生率:一项回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jan 11;9(1):E1-E9. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200287. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.
6
Clinical Outcomes, Costs, and Cost-effectiveness of Strategies for Adults Experiencing Sheltered Homelessness During the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间有庇护所无家可归经历的成年人的临床结局、成本及成本效益的策略。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2028195. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28195.
7
Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening.新冠病毒筛查时,检测敏感性次于检测频率和周转时间。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 1;7(1). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd5393. Print 2021 Jan.
8
Rethinking Covid-19 Test Sensitivity - A Strategy for Containment.重新思考新冠病毒检测敏感性——一种遏制策略。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):e120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2025631. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
9
COVID-19 among people experiencing homelessness in England: a modelling study.英格兰无家可归人群中的 COVID-19:一项建模研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Dec;8(12):1181-1191. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30396-9. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
10
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Prevalences Among People Experiencing Homelessness and Homelessness Service Staff During Early Community Transmission in Atlanta, Georgia, April-May 2020.2020 年 4 月至 5 月,在美国佐治亚州亚特兰大市社区传播早期,经历无家可归和无家可归者服务人员中的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)流行情况。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2978-e2984. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1340.