College of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China; State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (SKLESPC), School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
College of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 1;810:152302. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152302. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
The surge of medical waste (MW) generated during the COVID-19 pandemic has exceeded the disposal capacity of existing facilities. The timely, safe, and efficient emergency disposal of MW is critical to prevent the epidemic spread. Therefore, this review presents the current status of MW generation and disposal in China and analyzes the characteristics and applicability of emergency disposal technologies. The results show that movable disposal facilities can dispose of infectious MW on site, even though most of their disposal capacity is at a low level (<5 t/day). Co-disposal facilities need to be reformed completely for emergency MW disposal, in which separate feeding systems should be taken seriously. Specifically, municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration facilities have great potential to improve emergency MW disposal capacities. For hazardous waste incineration facilities, compatibility of the wastes must be matched to the composition and calorific value of the waste. As for cement kiln, MW can only be used as an alternative fuel instead of a raw material for cement. Based on the environmental risk and technical adaptability, the six emergency MW disposal technologies are recommended to be prioritized as follows: movable microwave sterilization, movable steam sterilization, movable incineration, co-incineration with hazardous waste, co-incineration with MSW and co-disposal in cement kilns. Infectious MW, especially COVID-19 MW, should be prioritized for disposal by centralized and movable disposal facilities, while non-infectious MW can be disposed of using co-disposal facilities. All stakeholders should strengthen the delicacy management of the end-of-life stage of MW, including collection, classification, packaging identification, transportation, and disposal. Currently, it is necessary for centralized disposal enterprises to follow the emergency disposal operation flowchart. From a long-term strategic perspective, making full use of regional movable and co-disposal facilities in the megacities can effectively enhance the emergency MW disposal capacity.
新冠疫情期间,医疗废物(MW)的产生量剧增,已超过现有处理设施的处理能力。及时、安全、高效地处理 MW 是防止疫情传播的关键。因此,本文介绍了中国 MW 的产生和处理现状,并分析了应急处理技术的特点和适用性。结果表明,移动处理设施可就地处理传染性 MW,尽管其大部分处理能力较低(<5 t/d)。对于需要进行全面改造的协同处理设施,应重视其单独的给料系统。具体而言,城市生活垃圾(MSW)焚烧设施具有提高应急 MW 处理能力的巨大潜力。对于危险废物焚烧设施,必须对废物的兼容性进行匹配,以适应废物的组成和热值。对于水泥窑,MW 只能作为替代燃料,而不能作为水泥的原料。基于环境风险和技术适应性,建议优先考虑以下 6 种应急 MW 处理技术:移动微波消毒、移动蒸汽消毒、移动焚烧、与危险废物共焚烧、与 MSW 共焚烧和在水泥窑中协同处置。传染性 MW,特别是新冠病毒 MW,应优先考虑使用集中式和移动处理设施进行处理,而非传染性 MW 可使用协同处理设施进行处理。所有利益相关方都应加强对 MW 生命周期末期的精细化管理,包括收集、分类、包装标识、运输和处理。目前,集中处理企业有必要遵循应急处理操作流程图。从长期战略角度来看,充分利用特大城市的区域移动和协同处理设施,可有效提高应急 MW 处理能力。