Dörler Daniel, Heigl Florian
Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
PeerJ. 2021 Nov 23;9:e12464. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12464. eCollection 2021.
To avoid the uncontrolled spread of COVID-19 in early 2020, many countries have implemented strict lockdown measures for several weeks. In Austria, the lockdown in early spring has led to a significant drop in human outdoor activities, especially in road traffic. In Project Roadkill, a citizen science project which aims to collect data on road-killed animals, we observed a significant decrease in reported roadkills.
By asking the citizen scientists through a survey how their travelling routines were affected, we investigated if the observed decrease in roadkills was grounded in less animals being killed by traffic, or in citizen scientists staying at home and thus reporting less road-killed animals.
A majority of the respondents stated that they felt to have reported less roadkills during the lockdown, regardless if they changed their travelling routine or not. This observation in combination with the overall decrease in road traffic indicates that fewer animals were killed during the lockdown. We conclude that when analyzing citizen science data, the effects of lockdown measures on reporting behaviour should be considered, because they can significantly affect data and interpretation of these data.
为避免2020年初新冠病毒的无节制传播,许多国家实施了为期数周的严格封锁措施。在奥地利,早春的封锁导致人类户外活动大幅减少,尤其是道路交通活动。在“道路死亡动物”项目中,这是一个旨在收集道路死亡动物数据的公民科学项目,我们观察到报告的道路死亡动物数量显著下降。
通过一项调查询问公民科学家他们的出行习惯受到了怎样的影响,我们研究了观察到的道路死亡动物数量下降是因为被交通致死的动物减少了,还是因为公民科学家待在家里从而报告的道路死亡动物数量减少了。
大多数受访者表示,他们觉得在封锁期间报告的道路死亡动物数量减少了,无论他们的出行习惯是否改变。这一观察结果与道路交通的总体减少相结合,表明在封锁期间被杀死的动物更少了。我们得出结论,在分析公民科学数据时,应考虑封锁措施对报告行为的影响,因为它们会显著影响数据以及对这些数据的解读。