National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; and.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Jun;19(6):971-980. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202107-823OC.
Differences in clinical presentation and outcomes between heart failure (HF) phenotypes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have not been assessed. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and healthcare resource use between patients with COPD and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmEF), and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Patients with COPD and HF were identified in the U.S. administrative claims database OptumLabs DataWarehouse between 2008 and 2018. All-cause and cause-specific (HF) hospitalization, acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD, severe and moderate combined), mortality, and healthcare resource use were compared between HF phenotypes. From 5,419 patients with COPD, 70% had HFpEF, 20% had HFrEF, and 10% had HFmEF. All-cause hospitalization did not differ across groups; however, patients with COPD and HFrEF had a greater risk of HF-specific hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.84) and mortality (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.33) than patients with COPD and HFpEF. Conversely, patients with COPD and HFrEF had a lower risk of AECOPD than those with COPD and HFpEF (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.66-0.87). Rates of long-term stays (in skilled-nursing facilities) and emergency room visits were lower for those with COPD and HFrEF than for those with COPD and HFpEF. Outcomes in patients with comorbid COPD and HFpEF are largely driven by COPD. Given the paucity in treatments for HFpEF, better differentiation between cardiac and respiratory symptoms may provide an opportunity to reduce the risk of AECOPD. Risk of death and HF hospitalization were highest among patients with COPD and HFrEF, emphasizing the importance of optimizing guideline-recommended HFrEF therapies in this group.
在患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患者中,心力衰竭(HF)表型之间的临床表现和结局差异尚未得到评估。本研究旨在比较 COPD 合并射血分数保留性心力衰竭(HFpEF)、轻度射血分数降低性心力衰竭(HFmEF)和射血分数降低性心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的临床结局和医疗资源利用情况。2008 年至 2018 年期间,在美国行政索赔数据库 OptumLabs DataWarehouse 中确定了 COPD 和 HF 患者。比较了 HF 表型之间的全因和特定原因(HF)住院、慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重(AECOPD,重度和中度合并)、死亡率和医疗资源利用情况。在 5419 名 COPD 患者中,70%患有 HFpEF,20%患有 HFrEF,10%患有 HFmEF。全因住院率在各组之间没有差异;然而,患有 COPD 和 HFrEF 的患者 HF 特异性住院(风险比[HR],1.54;95%置信区间[CI],1.29-1.84)和死亡率(HR,1.17;95%CI,1.03-1.33)的风险高于 COPD 和 HFpEF 患者。相反,患有 COPD 和 HFrEF 的患者 AECOPD 的风险低于 COPD 和 HFpEF 患者(HR,0.75;95%CI,0.66-0.87)。患有 COPD 和 HFrEF 的患者长期住院(在熟练护理设施)和急诊就诊的比例低于患有 COPD 和 HFpEF 的患者。患有合并 COPD 和 HFpEF 的患者的结局主要由 COPD 驱动。鉴于 HFpEF 的治疗方法很少,更好地区分心脏和呼吸症状可能有机会降低 AECOPD 的风险。患有 COPD 和 HFrEF 的患者的死亡率和 HF 住院率最高,这强调了在该组中优化指南推荐的 HFrEF 治疗方法的重要性。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023-11