Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospitalgrid.4973.9, Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospitalgrid.4973.9, Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark.
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0133021. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01330-21. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
"Testing Denmark" is a national, large-scale, epidemiological surveillance study of SARS-CoV-2 in the Danish population. Between September and October 2020, approximately 1.3 million people (age >15 years) were randomly invited to fill in an electronic questionnaire covering COVID-19 exposures and symptoms. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was determined by point-of care rapid test (POCT) distributed to participants' home addresses. In total, 318,552 participants (24.5% invitees) completed the study and 2,519 (0.79%) were seropositive. Of the participants with a prior positive PCR test ( = 1,828), 29.1% were seropositive in the POCT. Although seropositivity increased with age, participants 61 years and over reported fewer symptoms and were tested less frequently. Seropositivity was associated with physical contact with SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals (risk ratio [RR] 7.43, 95% CI: 6.57-8.41), particular in household members (RR 17.70, 95% CI: 15.60-20.10). A greater risk of seropositivity was seen in home care workers (RR 2.09, 95% CI: 1.58-2.78) compared to office workers. A high degree of adherence with national preventive recommendations was reported (e.g., >80% use of face masks), but no difference were found between seropositive and seronegative participants. The seroprevalence result was somewhat hampered by a lower-than-expected performance of the POCT. This is likely due to a low sensitivity of the POCT or problems reading the test results, and the main findings therefore relate to risk associations. More emphasis should be placed on age, occupation, and exposure in local communities. To date, including 318,522 participants, this is the largest population-based study with broad national participation where tests and questionnaires have been sent to participants' homes. We found that more emphasis from national and local authorities toward the risk of infection should be placed on age of tested individuals, type of occupation, as well as exposure in local communities and households. To meet the challenge that broad nationwide information can be difficult to gather. This study design sets the stage for a novel way of conducting studies. Additionally, this study design can be used as a supplementary model in future general test strategy for ongoing monitoring of COVID-19 immunity in the population, both from past infection and from vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, however, with attention to the complexity of performing and reading the POCT at home.
“丹麦测试”是一项在丹麦人群中针对 SARS-CoV-2 的全国性、大规模、流行病学监测研究。在 2020 年 9 月至 10 月期间,约有 130 万人(年龄>15 岁)被随机邀请填写一份涵盖 COVID-19 暴露和症状的电子问卷。通过分发给参与者家庭住址的即时护理快速检测(POCT)来确定 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的流行率。共有 318552 名参与者(受邀者的 24.5%)完成了这项研究,其中 2519 名(0.79%)呈血清阳性。在先前 PCR 检测呈阳性的参与者中( = 1828),29.1%的 POCT 呈血清阳性。尽管血清阳性率随年龄增长而增加,但 61 岁及以上的参与者报告的症状较少,接受检测的频率也较低。血清阳性与与 SARS-CoV-2 感染者的身体接触有关(风险比 [RR] 7.43,95%CI:6.57-8.41),特别是与家庭成员(RR 17.70,95%CI:15.60-20.10)。与上班族相比,家庭护理人员的血清阳性风险更高(RR 2.09,95%CI:1.58-2.78)。报告了高度遵守国家预防建议(例如,>80%使用口罩),但在血清阳性和血清阴性参与者之间没有发现差异。POCT 的性能低于预期,对血清阳性率结果产生了一定的影响。这可能是由于 POCT 的灵敏度较低或读取测试结果存在问题,因此主要发现与风险关联有关。应更加重视年龄、职业和当地社区的暴露情况。 到目前为止,这项研究包括 318552 名参与者,是一项规模最大的基于人群的研究,具有广泛的全国参与度,向参与者的家庭发送了检测和问卷。我们发现,国家和地方当局应更加重视受检个体的年龄、职业类型以及当地社区和家庭中的暴露情况,以降低感染风险。为了应对广泛的全国性信息难以收集的挑战。这种研究设计为开展研究开辟了新途径。此外,这种研究设计可以作为未来针对 SARS-CoV-2 进行人群中 COVID-19 免疫持续监测的一般检测策略的补充模型,但是要注意在家中进行 POCT 的复杂性和读取结果的复杂性。