• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两极分化、党派之争与疫情:2020年春夏期间县级地区对唐纳德·特朗普的支持与新冠疫情传播之间的关系。

Polarization, partisanship, and pandemic: The relationship between county-level support for Donald Trump and the spread of Covid-19 during the spring and summer of 2020.

作者信息

Morris David S

机构信息

Department of Sociology & Anthropology College of Charleston Charleston South Carolina USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Q. 2021 Sep;102(5):2412-2431. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13053. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1111/ssqu.13053
PMID:34908615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8662106/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Republicans and Democrats have displayed widely divergent beliefs and behaviors related to COVID-19, creating the possibility that geographic areas with more Donald Trump supporters may be more likely to suffer from the disease.

METHODS

I use 2016 election data, COVID-19 case and mortality data, and multilevel linear growth models with state fixed effects to estimate the relationship between county-level support for Donald Trump and the trajectory of cumulative COVID-19 cases and deaths per 100,000 county residents between March 17, 2020 and August 31, 2020.

RESULTS

Counties more supportive of Trump had fewer COVID-19 cases and deaths in the early months of the pandemic. However, as the summer moved into July and August, counties less supportive of Trump stopped growth rates of COVID-19 cases and deaths, while counties more supportive of Trump saw a trajectory of increased cases and deaths in July and August. This is likely due to the widely divergent beliefs and behaviors displayed by Republicans and Democrats toward COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the power of polarization and partisanship in the public sphere, even when it comes to a public health issue.

摘要

目的

共和党人和民主党人在与新冠病毒相关的信念和行为上表现出了广泛的差异,这使得在那些有更多唐纳德·特朗普支持者的地理区域可能更易感染该疾病。

方法

我使用2016年的选举数据、新冠病毒病例和死亡率数据,以及带有州固定效应的多层线性增长模型,来估计县级层面上对唐纳德·特朗普的支持与2020年3月17日至2020年8月31日期间每10万名县居民中新冠病毒累积病例和死亡轨迹之间的关系。

结果

在疫情爆发的最初几个月里,对特朗普支持度更高的县的新冠病毒病例和死亡人数较少。然而,随着夏季进入7月和8月,对特朗普支持度较低的县的新冠病毒病例和死亡增长率停止上升,而对特朗普支持度更高的县在7月和8月出现了病例和死亡人数增加的轨迹。这可能是由于共和党人和民主党人对新冠病毒表现出的广泛不同的信念和行为。

结论

本研究强调了公共领域中两极分化和党派偏见的影响力,即使是在涉及公共卫生问题时也是如此。

相似文献

1
Polarization, partisanship, and pandemic: The relationship between county-level support for Donald Trump and the spread of Covid-19 during the spring and summer of 2020.两极分化、党派之争与疫情:2020年春夏期间县级地区对唐纳德·特朗普的支持与新冠疫情传播之间的关系。
Soc Sci Q. 2021 Sep;102(5):2412-2431. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13053. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
2
Explaining the U.S. rural disadvantage in COVID-19 case and death rates during the Delta-Omicron surge: The role of politics, vaccinations, population health, and social determinants.解释美国在德尔塔-奥密克戎疫情期间 COVID-19 病例和死亡率方面处于不利地位的原因:政治、疫苗接种、人口健康和社会决定因素的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Oct;335:116180. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116180. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
3
Nail in the Coffin or Lifeline? Evaluating the Electoral Impact of COVID-19 on President Trump in the 2020 Election.棺材上的钉子还是生命线?评估新冠疫情对特朗普总统在2020年大选中的选举影响。
Polit Behav. 2022 Oct 23:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s11109-022-09826-x.
4
Death by political party: The relationship between COVID-19 deaths and political party affiliation in the United States.按政党划分的死亡情况:美国新冠疫情死亡人数与政党归属之间的关系
World Med Health Policy. 2021 Jun;13(2):224-249. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.435. Epub 2021 May 5.
5
The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election.2019冠状病毒病大流行与2020年美国总统选举。
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(2):739-767. doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00820-3. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
Conservatism and infrequent mask usage: A study of US counties during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.保守主义与口罩使用频率低:一项关于美国各县在新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行期间的研究。
Soc Sci Q. 2021 Sep;102(5):2368-2382. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13025. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
7
Not "My" crisis: Social identity and followers' crisis responses to COVID-19.并非“我的”危机:社会认同与追随者对新冠疫情的危机反应
Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2022 Jul 12. doi: 10.1111/asap.12316.
8
Did the COVID-19 pandemic help or hurt Donald Trump's political fortunes?新冠疫情大流行对唐纳德·特朗普的政治命运是有帮助还是有伤害?
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 24;16(2):e0247664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247664. eCollection 2021.
9
"I feel it in my gut:" Epistemic Motivations, Political Beliefs, and Misperceptions of COVID-19 and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.“我凭直觉感觉到:”认知动机、政治信仰以及对新冠疫情和2020年美国总统大选的误解
J Soc Polit Psychol. 2022;10(2):643-656. doi: 10.5964/jspp.7823. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
10
Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.党派之间在保持社交距离方面的分歧与 COVID-19 大流行期间的健康结果有关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1186-1197. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Politics in Public Health: Growing Partisan Divides in COVID-19 Vaccine Attitudes and Uptake Post-2021 Presidential Inauguration.公共卫生领域的政治:2021年总统就职典礼后,新冠疫苗态度和接种情况中党派分歧日益扩大。
Int J Public Health. 2025 May 14;70:1608162. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1608162. eCollection 2025.
2
The Association of County-Level Presidential Election Outcome and COVID-19 Mortality in Colorado, 2020-2022.2020 - 2022年科罗拉多州县一级总统选举结果与新冠病毒死亡率的关联
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2025;31(3):E179-E186. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002098. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
3
Longitudinal trajectories of coronavirus anxiety and health behavior use before and after the U.S. 2020 presidential election: The effects of political orientation.2020 年美国总统大选前后冠状病毒焦虑和健康行为使用的纵向轨迹:政治取向的影响。
J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Dec;92:102643. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102643. Epub 2022 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Poverty, inequality and COVID-19: the forgotten vulnerable.贫困、不平等与新冠疫情:被遗忘的弱势群体。
Public Health. 2020 Jun;183:110-111. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 14.
2
Racial Health Disparities and Covid-19 - Caution and Context.种族健康差异与新冠疫情——谨慎态度与背景情况
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 16;383(3):201-203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2012910. Epub 2020 May 6.
3
Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.中国武汉 2019 年冠状病毒病肺炎患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征和死亡的相关危险因素。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):934-943. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994.