Heesen Raphaela, Zuberbühler Klaus, Bangerter Adrian, Iglesias Katia, Rossano Federico, Pajot Aude, Guéry Jean-Pascal, Genty Emilie
Institute of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Department of Psychology, Durham University, UK.
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Dec 8;8(12):211121. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211121. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Human joint action seems special, as it is grounded in joint commitment-a sense of mutual obligation participants feel towards each other. Comparative research with humans and non-human great apes has typically investigated joint commitment by experimentally interrupting joint actions to study subjects' resumption strategies. However, such experimental interruptions are human-induced, and thus the question remains of how great apes naturally handle interruptions. Here, we focus on naturally occurring interruptions of joint actions, grooming and play, in bonobos and chimpanzees. Similar to humans, both species frequently resumed interrupted joint actions (and the previous behaviours, like grooming the same body part region or playing the same play type) with their previous partners and at the previous location. Yet, the probability of resumption attempts was unaffected by social bonds or rank. Our data suggest that great apes experience something akin to joint commitment, for which we discuss possible evolutionary origins.
人类的联合行动似乎很特别,因为它基于联合承诺——参与者彼此之间感受到的一种相互义务感。对人类和非人类的大型猿类进行的比较研究通常通过实验性地中断联合行动来研究受试者的恢复策略,以此来探究联合承诺。然而,这种实验性中断是人为造成的,因此,大型猿类如何自然地应对中断这一问题依然存在。在这里,我们关注倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩联合行动、梳理毛发和玩耍等自然发生的中断情况。与人类相似,这两个物种都经常与之前的伙伴在之前的地点恢复被中断的联合行动(以及之前的行为,比如梳理同一个身体部位或进行同一种玩耍类型)。然而,恢复尝试的可能性不受社会关系或等级的影响。我们的数据表明,大型猿类体验到了类似于联合承诺的东西,对此我们讨论了可能的进化起源。