• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于价值选择的信心来源。

Sources of confidence in value-based choice.

机构信息

Decision Neuroscience Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Neuroscience Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2021 Dec 17;12(1):7337. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27618-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-27618-5
PMID:34921144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8683513/
Abstract

Confidence, the subjective estimate of decision quality, is a cognitive process necessary for learning from mistakes and guiding future actions. The origins of confidence judgments resulting from economic decisions remain unclear. We devise a task and computational framework that allowed us to formally tease apart the impact of various sources of confidence in value-based decisions, such as uncertainty emerging from encoding and decoding operations, as well as the interplay between gaze-shift dynamics and attentional effort. In line with canonical decision theories, trial-to-trial fluctuations in the precision of value encoding impact economic choice consistency. However, this uncertainty has no influence on confidence reports. Instead, confidence is associated with endogenous attentional effort towards choice alternatives and down-stream noise in the comparison process. These findings provide an explanation for confidence (miss)attributions in value-guided behaviour, suggesting mechanistic influences of endogenous attentional states for guiding decisions and metacognitive awareness of choice certainty.

摘要

信心是对决策质量的主观估计,是从错误中学习和指导未来行动的认知过程。经济决策产生的信心判断的起源尚不清楚。我们设计了一个任务和计算框架,使我们能够正式区分基于价值的决策中各种信心来源的影响,例如来自编码和解码操作的不确定性,以及注视转移动态和注意力努力之间的相互作用。与典型的决策理论一致,值编码精度的试验间波动会影响经济选择的一致性。然而,这种不确定性对信心报告没有影响。相反,信心与对选择替代方案的内源性注意力努力以及比较过程中的下游噪声有关。这些发现为价值引导行为中的信心(错误)归因提供了解释,表明内源性注意状态对指导决策和对选择确定性的元认知意识的机制影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c1/8683513/c977639d2d90/41467_2021_27618_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c1/8683513/552e2467b767/41467_2021_27618_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c1/8683513/6718b7e36d27/41467_2021_27618_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c1/8683513/d58c4d7062fa/41467_2021_27618_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c1/8683513/5fdcf701ce72/41467_2021_27618_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c1/8683513/c977639d2d90/41467_2021_27618_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c1/8683513/552e2467b767/41467_2021_27618_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c1/8683513/6718b7e36d27/41467_2021_27618_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c1/8683513/d58c4d7062fa/41467_2021_27618_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c1/8683513/5fdcf701ce72/41467_2021_27618_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c1/8683513/c977639d2d90/41467_2021_27618_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sources of confidence in value-based choice.基于价值选择的信心来源。
Nat Commun. 2021 Dec 17;12(1):7337. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27618-5.
2
Trading mental effort for confidence in the metacognitive control of value-based decision-making.用心理努力换取基于价值的决策元认知控制的信心。
Elife. 2021 Apr 26;10:e63282. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63282.
3
Reverse engineering of metacognition.元认知的反向工程。
Elife. 2022 Sep 15;11:e75420. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75420.
4
Value certainty and choice confidence are multidimensional constructs that guide decision-making.价值确定性和选择信心是指导决策的多维结构。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun;23(3):503-521. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01054-4. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
5
Post-decision wagering after perceptual judgments reveals bi-directional certainty readouts.决策后押注在知觉判断后揭示了双向确定性读出。
Cognition. 2018 Jul;176:40-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
6
The online metacognitive control of decisions.决策的在线元认知控制。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Mar 27;2(1):23. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00071-y.
7
Confidence in risky value-based choice.基于风险的选择的信心。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):1021-1028. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01848-y. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
8
Confidence modulates exploration and exploitation in value-based learning.信心在基于价值的学习中调节探索与利用。
Neurosci Conscious. 2019 May 8;2019(1):niz004. doi: 10.1093/nc/niz004. eCollection 2019.
9
Choosing what we like vs liking what we choose: How choice-induced preference change might actually be instrumental to decision-making.选择我们喜欢的与喜欢我们选择的:选择诱发偏好改变如何真正对决策起到工具性作用。
PLoS One. 2020 May 18;15(5):e0231081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231081. eCollection 2020.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Probing for intentions: The early readiness potential does not reflect awareness of motor preparation.探寻意图:早期准备电位并不反映运动准备意识。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Feb 7;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00465. eCollection 2025.
2
The relationship between confidence and gaze-at-nothing oculomotor dynamics during decision-making.决策过程中信心与无注视眼动动力学之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 7;20(7):e0310231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310231. eCollection 2025.
3
Computational characterization of metacognitive ability in subjective decision-making.

本文引用的文献

1
Rational inattention in mice.小鼠中的理性疏忽。
Sci Adv. 2022 Mar 4;8(9):eabj8935. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj8935.
2
Tuned inhibition in perceptual decision-making circuits can explain seemingly suboptimal confidence behavior.知觉决策回路中的调谐抑制可以解释看似次优的置信行为。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 29;17(3):e1008779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008779. eCollection 2021 Mar.
3
Visual attention modulates the integration of goal-relevant evidence and not value.视觉注意力调节与目标相关的证据的整合,而不是价值。
主观决策中元认知能力的计算表征
bioRxiv. 2025 May 28:2025.05.23.655775. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.23.655775.
4
Introspective access to value-based multi-attribute choice processes.对基于价值的多属性选择过程的内省式访问。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 20;16(1):3733. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59080-y.
5
A population representation of the confidence in a decision in the parietal cortex.顶叶皮层中对决策信心的群体表征。
Cell Rep. 2025 Apr 22;44(4):115526. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115526. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
6
Multifaceted confidence in exploratory choice.对探索性选择的多方面信心。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 9;20(1):e0304923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304923. eCollection 2025.
7
A Population Representation of the Confidence in a Decision in the Parietal Cortex.顶叶皮层中决策信心的群体表征。
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 1:2024.08.15.608159. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.15.608159.
8
The asymmetric impact of decision-making confidence on regret and relief.决策信心对遗憾和宽慰的非对称影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 8;15:1365743. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1365743. eCollection 2024.
9
Limits of Optimization.优化的局限性。
Minds Mach (Dordr). 2024;34(Suppl 1):117-137. doi: 10.1007/s11023-023-09633-1. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
10
Value certainty and choice confidence are multidimensional constructs that guide decision-making.价值确定性和选择信心是指导决策的多维结构。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun;23(3):503-521. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01054-4. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
Elife. 2020 Nov 17;9:e60705. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60705.
4
Efficient sampling and noisy decisions.高效采样和噪声决策。
Elife. 2020 Sep 15;9:e54962. doi: 10.7554/eLife.54962.
5
Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence.运用贝叶斯因子假设检验在神经科学中建立无证据的结论。
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Jul;23(7):788-799. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0660-4. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
6
Dissociable mechanisms govern when and how strongly reward attributes affect decisions.分离的机制决定了奖励属性何时以及以何种强度影响决策。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):949-963. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0893-y. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
7
Confidence controls perceptual evidence accumulation.置信度控制感知证据的积累。
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 9;11(1):1753. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15561-w.
8
Value-based attention but not divisive normalization influences decisions with multiple alternatives.基于价值的注意力而非分歧归一化影响具有多个备选方案的决策。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):634-645. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0822-0. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
9
Gaze bias differences capture individual choice behaviour.注视偏好差异可以捕捉个体的选择行为。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jun;3(6):625-635. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0584-8. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
10
Human noise blindness drives suboptimal cognitive inference.人类噪声盲导致次优认知推断。
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 12;10(1):1719. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09330-7.