Osburn Shelby C, Vann Christopher G, Church David D, Ferrando Arny A, Roberts Michael D
School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Physiologia. 2021 Dec;1(1):22-33. doi: 10.3390/physiologia1010005. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
Muscle protein synthesis and proteolysis are tightly coupled processes. Given that muscle growth is promoted by increases in net protein balance, it stands to reason that bolstering protein synthesis through amino acids while reducing or inhibiting proteolysis could be a synergistic strategy in enhancing anabolism. However, there is contradictory evidence suggesting that the proper functioning of proteolytic systems in muscle is required for homeostasis. To add clarity to this issue, we sought to determine if inhibiting different proteolytic systems in C2C12 myotubes in conjunction with acute and chronic leucine treatments affected markers of anabolism. In Experiment 1, myotubes underwent 1-h, 6-h, and 24-h treatments with serum and leucine-free DMEM containing the following compounds ( = 6 wells per treatment): (i) DMSO vehicle (CTL), (ii) 2 mM leucine + vehicle (Leu-only), (iii) 2 mM leucine + 40 μM MG132 (20S proteasome inhibitor) (Leu + MG132), (iv) 2 mM leucine + 50 μM calpeptin (calpain inhibitor) (Leu + CALP), and (v) 2 mM leucine + 1 μM 3-methyladenine (autophagy inhibitor) (Leu + 3MA). Protein synthesis levels significantly increased ( < 0.05) in the Leu-only and Leu + 3MA 6-h treatments compared to CTL, and levels were significantly lower in Leu + MG132 and Leu + CALP versus Leu-only and CTL. With 24-h treatments, total protein yield was significantly lower in Leu + MG132 cells versus other treatments. Additionally, the intracellular essential amino acid (EAA) pool was significantly greater in 24-h Leu + MG132 treatments versus other treatments. In a follow-up experiment, myotubes were treated for 48 h with CTL, Leu-only, and Leu + MG132 for morphological assessments. Results indicated Leu + MG132 yielded significantly smaller myotubes compared to CTL and Leu-only. Our data are limited in scope due to the utilization of select proteolysis inhibitors. However, this is the first evidence to suggest proteasome and calpain inhibition with MG132 and CALP, respectively, abrogate leucine-induced protein synthesis in myotubes. Additionally, longer-term Leu + MG132 treatments translated to an atrophy phenotype. Whether or not proteasome inhibition in vivo reduces leucine- or EAA-induced anabolism remains to be determined.
肌肉蛋白质合成与蛋白水解是紧密相关的过程。鉴于净蛋白质平衡的增加会促进肌肉生长,那么通过氨基酸增强蛋白质合成同时减少或抑制蛋白水解可能是增强合成代谢的一种协同策略,这是合乎情理的。然而,有相互矛盾的证据表明,肌肉中蛋白水解系统的正常功能对于体内稳态是必需的。为了更清楚地阐明这个问题,我们试图确定在C2C12肌管中抑制不同的蛋白水解系统并结合急性和慢性亮氨酸处理是否会影响合成代谢标志物。在实验1中,肌管用含以下化合物的无血清和无亮氨酸的DMEM进行1小时、6小时和24小时处理(每个处理 = 6孔):(i) DMSO溶剂(对照),(ii) +溶剂(仅亮氨酸),(iii) + 40 μM MG132(20S蛋白酶体抑制剂)(亮氨酸 + MG132),(iv) + 50 μM钙蛋白酶抑制素(钙蛋白酶抑制剂)(亮氨酸 + CALP),以及(v) + 1 μM 3 - 甲基腺嘌呤(自噬抑制剂)(亮氨酸 + 3MA)。与对照相比,仅亮氨酸和亮氨酸 + 3MA 6小时处理组的蛋白质合成水平显著增加(<0.05),而亮氨酸 + MG132和亮氨酸 + CALP组的水平显著低于仅亮氨酸组和对照组。在24小时处理时,亮氨酸 + MG132细胞中的总蛋白产量显著低于其他处理组。此外,亮氨酸 + MG132 24小时处理组的细胞内必需氨基酸(EAA)库显著大于其他处理组。在后续实验中,肌管用对照、仅亮氨酸和亮氨酸 + MG132处理48小时以进行形态学评估。结果表明,与对照和仅亮氨酸组相比,亮氨酸 + MG132产生的肌管明显更小。由于使用了特定的蛋白水解抑制剂,我们的数据范围有限。然而,这是首个证据表明分别用MG132和CALP抑制蛋白酶体和钙蛋白酶可消除亮氨酸诱导肌管中的蛋白质合成。此外,长期亮氨酸 + MG132处理导致萎缩表型。体内蛋白酶体抑制是否会降低亮氨酸或EAA诱导的合成代谢仍有待确定。