• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

太阳能照明和电力对孕产妇保健质量和及时性的影响:乌干达的一项阶梯式随机分组临床试验。

Impact of Solar Light and Electricity on the Quality and Timeliness of Maternity Care: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trial in Uganda.

机构信息

Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.

University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Dec 21;9(4):777-792. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00205. Print 2021 Dec 31.

DOI:10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00205
PMID:34933975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8691890/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the impact of solar light installation in Ugandan maternity facilities on implementation processes, reliability of light, and quality of intrapartum care.

METHODS

We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial of the We Care Solar Suitcase, a complete solar electric system providing lighting and power for charging phones and small medical devices, in 30 rural Ugandan maternity facilities with unreliable lighting. Facilities were randomly assigned to receive the intervention in the first or second sequence in a 1:1 ratio. We collected data from June 2018 to April 2019. The intervention was installed in September 2018 (first sequence) and in December 2018 (second sequence). The primary effectiveness outcomes were a 20-item and a 36-item index of quality of intrapartum care, a 6-item index of delays in care provision, and the percentage of deliveries with bright light, satisfactory light, and adequate light.

RESULTS

We observed 1,118 births across 30 facilities. The intervention was successfully installed in 100% of facilities. After installation, the intervention was used in 83% of nighttime deliveries. Before the intervention, providers on average performed 42% of essential care actions and accumulated 76 minutes of delays during nighttime deliveries. After installation, quality increased by 4 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI]=1,8) and delays in care decreased by 10 minutes (95% CI=-16,-3), with the largest impacts on infection control, prevention of postpartum hemorrhage, and newborn care practices. One year after the end of the trial, 90% of facilities had LED lights in operation and 60% of facilities had all components in operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Reliable light is an important driver of timely and adequate health care. Policy makers should invest in renewable energy systems for health facilities; however, even when reliable lighting is present, quality of care may remain low without a broader approach to quality improvements.

摘要

背景

我们评估了在乌干达产科设施中安装太阳能灯对实施过程、光照可靠性和分娩期护理质量的影响。

方法

我们对 30 家农村乌干达产科设施进行了一项 We Care Solar Suitcase(一种完整的太阳能发电系统,可为手机和小型医疗设备充电提供照明和电力)的分步楔形集群随机试验,这些设施的照明都不可靠。设施以 1:1 的比例随机分配接受干预的第一或第二顺序。我们收集了 2018 年 6 月至 2019 年 4 月的数据。干预措施于 2018 年 9 月(第一顺序)和 2018 年 12 月(第二顺序)安装。主要有效性结果是 20 项和 36 项分娩期护理质量指数、6 项护理提供延迟指数和明亮灯光、满意灯光和充足灯光的分娩百分比。

结果

我们观察了 30 家机构的 1118 例分娩。干预措施在 100%的设施中成功安装。安装后,干预措施在 83%的夜间分娩中使用。在干预前,提供者平均执行了 42%的基本护理操作,并在夜间分娩期间积累了 76 分钟的延迟。安装后,质量提高了 4 个百分点(95%置信区间[CI]=1,8),护理延迟减少了 10 分钟(95%CI=-16,-3),对感染控制、预防产后出血和新生儿护理实践的影响最大。试验结束一年后,90%的设施仍在运行 LED 灯,60%的设施仍在运行所有组件。

结论

可靠的照明是及时和充足医疗保健的重要驱动因素。政策制定者应投资于卫生设施的可再生能源系统;然而,即使有可靠的照明,如果没有更广泛的质量改进方法,护理质量可能仍然很低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238b/8691890/cf13082debed/GH-GHSP210088F004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238b/8691890/90bb2fb0fa90/GH-GHSP210088P001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238b/8691890/4940d6d383b1/GH-GHSP210088F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238b/8691890/dabab2cfff35/GH-GHSP210088F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238b/8691890/70bfdd9f396f/GH-GHSP210088F003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238b/8691890/cf13082debed/GH-GHSP210088F004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238b/8691890/90bb2fb0fa90/GH-GHSP210088P001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238b/8691890/4940d6d383b1/GH-GHSP210088F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238b/8691890/dabab2cfff35/GH-GHSP210088F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238b/8691890/70bfdd9f396f/GH-GHSP210088F003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238b/8691890/cf13082debed/GH-GHSP210088F004.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Solar Light and Electricity on the Quality and Timeliness of Maternity Care: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trial in Uganda.太阳能照明和电力对孕产妇保健质量和及时性的影响:乌干达的一项阶梯式随机分组临床试验。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Dec 21;9(4):777-792. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00205. Print 2021 Dec 31.
2
Shedding light on quality of care: a study protocol for a randomized trial evaluating the impact of the Solar Suitcase in rural health facilities on maternal and newborn care quality in Uganda.揭示护理质量:一项随机试验研究方案,评估太阳能医疗箱在乌干达农村卫生机构对母婴保健质量的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2453-x.
3
Impact of reliable light and electricity on job satisfaction among maternity health workers in Uganda: A cluster randomized trial.乌干达母婴保健工作者对可靠的光照和电力对工作满意度的影响:一项整群随机试验。
Hum Resour Health. 2022 Mar 29;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00722-3.
4
Know-do gaps in obstetric and newborn care quality in Uganda: a cross-sectional study in rural health facilities.乌干达产科和新生儿护理质量中的知行差距:农村卫生机构的横断面研究。
Trop Med Int Health. 2021 May;26(5):535-545. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13557. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
5
Solar-powered O delivery for the treatment of children with hypoxaemia in Uganda: a stepped-wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial.太阳能供氧治疗乌干达缺氧儿童:一项阶梯式、集群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2024 Feb 24;403(10428):756-765. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02502-3. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
6
Solar-powered oxygen delivery for the treatment of children with hypoxemia: protocol for a cluster-randomized stepped-wedge controlled trial in Uganda.太阳能供氧治疗低氧血症儿童:乌干达一项整群随机阶梯楔形对照试验方案
Trials. 2019 Dec 5;20(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3752-2.
7
Effect of a quality improvement package for intrapartum and immediate newborn care on fresh stillbirth and neonatal mortality among preterm and low-birthweight babies in Kenya and Uganda: a cluster-randomised facility-based trial.肯尼亚和乌干达一项以单位为基础的群组随机对照试验:产时和新生儿即刻护理质量改进包对早产儿和低体重儿的新鲜死胎和新生儿死亡的影响。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Aug;8(8):e1061-e1070. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30232-1.
8
Addressing the Second Delay in Saving Mothers, Giving Life Districts in Uganda and Zambia: Reaching Appropriate Maternal Care in a Timely Manner.解决乌干达和赞比亚的“第二个母婴死亡延迟”问题:及时提供适当的母婴保健服务。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S68-S84. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00367. Print 2019 Mar 11.
9
Evaluation of a novel device for the management of high blood pressure and shock in pregnancy in low-resource settings: study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial (CRADLE-3 trial).在资源匮乏地区评估一种用于管理妊娠期高血压和休克的新型设备:阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验(CRADLE-3试验)的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Mar 27;19(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2581-z.
10
Differences in essential newborn care at birth between private and public health facilities in eastern Uganda.乌干达东部私立和公立医疗机构在新生儿出生时基本护理方面的差异。
Glob Health Action. 2015 Mar 31;8:24251. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.24251. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Obstetrics and gynecology devices designed for low- and middle-income countries: A narrative review.针对低收入和中等收入国家设计的妇产科设备:一项叙述性综述。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Apr;169(1):71-80. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16048. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
2
Timeliness of Delivery Care and Maternal and Neonatal Health Outcomes in Private Facilities in Masaka Area, Uganda: A Quasi-Experimental Study.乌干达马萨卡地区私立医疗机构分娩护理的及时性与孕产妇和新生儿健康结局:一项准实验研究
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Nov;27(11):2048-2057. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03754-w. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
3
Impact of reliable light and electricity on job satisfaction among maternity health workers in Uganda: A cluster randomized trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation research on sustainable electrification of rural primary care facilities in Ghana and Uganda.加纳和乌干达农村初级医疗设施可持续电气化的实施研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Nov 1;35(Supplement_2):ii124-ii136. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa077.
2
Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.卫生工作者对使用移动健康技术提供初级卫生保健服务的看法和体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 26;3(3):CD011942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011942.pub2.
3
Did a quality improvement intervention improve quality of maternal health care? Implementation evaluation from a cluster-randomized controlled study.
乌干达母婴保健工作者对可靠的光照和电力对工作满意度的影响:一项整群随机试验。
Hum Resour Health. 2022 Mar 29;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00722-3.
4
A Call to Action: Reinvigorating Interest and Investments in Health Infrastructure.呼吁行动:重振对卫生基础设施的兴趣和投资。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Dec 21;9(4):711-715. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00674. Print 2021 Dec 31.
一项质量改进干预措施是否提高了孕产妇保健质量?一项基于群组随机对照研究的实施评估。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Apr 21;32(1):54-63. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz126.
4
Shedding light on quality of care: a study protocol for a randomized trial evaluating the impact of the Solar Suitcase in rural health facilities on maternal and newborn care quality in Uganda.揭示护理质量:一项随机试验研究方案,评估太阳能医疗箱在乌干达农村卫生机构对母婴保健质量的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2453-x.
5
Time trends in facility-based and private-sector childbirth care: analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys from 25 sub-Saharan African countries from 2000 to 2016.机构和私营部门的儿童分娩护理的时间趋势:2000 年至 2016 年来自 25 个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的人口与健康调查分析。
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020406. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020406.
6
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review.RE-AIM规划与评估框架:历经20年回顾,适应新科学与实践
Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 29;7:64. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064. eCollection 2019.
7
Ugandan health workers' and mothers' views and experiences of the quality of maternity care and the use of informal solutions: A qualitative study.乌干达卫生工作者和母亲对母婴保健质量和非正规解决方案使用的看法和经验:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 11;14(3):e0213511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213511. eCollection 2019.
8
Primary care physicians' attitudes to the adoption of electronic medical records: a systematic review and evidence synthesis using the clinical adoption framework.基层医疗保健医生对采用电子病历的态度:使用临床采用框架的系统评价和证据综合。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 13;18(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0703-x.
9
Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries.全民健康覆盖时代低质量卫生系统导致的死亡:137 个国家可避免死亡的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2203-2212. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31668-4. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
10
Three global health-care quality reports in 2018.2018年的三份全球医疗保健质量报告。
Lancet. 2018 Jul 21;392(10143):194-195. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31430-2.