• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无意识的社会关系威胁:无形的老板面孔会影响注意力。

Unconscious social relation threats: Invisible boss face biases attention.

作者信息

Sun Yanliang, Xu Luzi, Luo Xinyu, Ren Yanju, Ding Xiaowei

机构信息

School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, No.1 University Road, Jinan, China.

Department of Psychology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Mental Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, 132 Waihuan East Road, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jan;84(1):76-88. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02366-2. Epub 2021 Dec 21.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-021-02366-2
PMID:34935121
Abstract

Threatening stimuli as a kind of salient information often guide attentional orienting. Besides physically threatening stimuli, social threats can also strongly bias attention, even in the absence of conscious awareness. However, the available evidence mainly came from studies on an emotional face. It is unclear whether social relation threats, such as a boss face without emotional expressions, can also direct attentional orienting unconsciously. This study aimed to reveal the extent to which the attentional system has developed to process threatening stimuli by exploring whether invisible social relation threats unconsciously biased attention. We asked graduate and undergraduate students to perform a modified Posner's cue-target task, in which the probe was preceded by a pair of competitive face cues (an advisor's face and another faculty member's face), rendered invisible through continuous flash suppression. Experiment 1a's results showed that the advisor's face reflexively oriented graduate students' spatial attention, which was significantly correlated with subjective social threat evaluation. However, Experiment 1b showed that an invisible advisor's face did not induce the same effect in undergraduate students, as they reported significantly fewer threats from their advisors than graduates. To ensure the robustness of this new effect, we preregistered a replicate study and successfully replicated the above results in Experiments 2a and 2b. Our findings provide evidence for the existence of an attentional orienting bias toward invisible social relation threats. These results suggest that the attentional system evolved to promote the exploration of our visual environment for threatening social relation signals.

摘要

威胁性刺激作为一种显著信息,常常引导注意力定向。除了身体上的威胁性刺激外,社会威胁也能强烈地使注意力产生偏差,即使在没有意识觉察的情况下也是如此。然而,现有的证据主要来自于对情绪化面孔的研究。尚不清楚诸如没有表情的老板面孔等社会关系威胁是否也能在无意识的情况下引导注意力定向。本研究旨在通过探究无形的社会关系威胁是否会在无意识中使注意力产生偏差,来揭示注意力系统在处理威胁性刺激方面的发展程度。我们让研究生和本科生进行一项修改后的波斯纳线索-目标任务,在该任务中,探测刺激之前会有一对竞争性的面孔线索(一位导师的面孔和另一位教员的面孔),通过持续闪光抑制使其不可见。实验1a的结果表明,导师的面孔会自动定向研究生的空间注意力,这与主观社会威胁评估显著相关。然而,实验1b表明,无形的导师面孔在本科生中并未产生同样的效果,因为他们报告来自导师的威胁明显少于研究生。为确保这一新效应的稳健性,我们预先注册了一项重复研究,并在实验2a和2b中成功重复了上述结果。我们的研究结果为存在针对无形社会关系威胁的注意力定向偏差提供了证据。这些结果表明,注意力系统的进化是为了促进对视觉环境中威胁性社会关系信号的探测。

相似文献

1
Unconscious social relation threats: Invisible boss face biases attention.无意识的社会关系威胁:无形的老板面孔会影响注意力。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jan;84(1):76-88. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02366-2. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
2
Biphasic attentional orienting triggered by invisible social signals.双相注意定向由不可见的社会信号触发。
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:129-139. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
3
Dissociation between temporal attention and Consciousness: Unconscious temporal cue induces temporal expectation effect.时间注意与意识的分离:无意识的时间线索引起时间预期效应。
Conscious Cogn. 2024 Mar;119:103670. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103670. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
4
It occurs after all: Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe task.毕竟它还是出现了:点探测任务中对笑脸的注意偏向。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jul;82(5):2463-2481. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02017-y.
5
Attentional bias towards angry faces is moderated by the activation of a social processing mode in the general population.一般人群中,对愤怒面孔的注意力偏向受社会加工模式激活的调节。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Nov;33(7):1317-1329. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1561423. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
6
Focus on the positive: anxiety modulates the effects of emotional stimuli on hemispheric attention.关注积极面:焦虑调节情绪刺激对半球注意的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2013 Oct;83(1):52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
7
Unconscious pupillometry: An effect of "attentional contagion" in the absence of visual awareness.无意识瞳孔测量:在没有视觉意识的情况下“注意力传染”的一种效应。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Feb;151(2):302-308. doi: 10.1037/xge0000927. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
8
The flexibility of emotional attention: accessible social identities guide rapid attentional orienting.情绪注意的灵活性:可及的社会身份引导快速注意定向。
Cognition. 2012 Nov;125(2):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
9
The effect of social anxiety on top-down attentional orienting to emotional faces.社交焦虑对情绪面孔自上而下注意定向的影响。
Emotion. 2022 Apr;22(3):572-585. doi: 10.1037/emo0000764. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
10
Threat captures attention, but not automatically: Top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to threat distractors.威胁会吸引注意力,但并非自动如此:自上而下的目标会调节对威胁性干扰物的注意力定向。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2266-79. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1142-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.解决注意力捕获争论的进展。
Vis cogn. 2021;29(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
2
Action opportunities modulate attention allocation under social threat.行动机会调节社会威胁下的注意力分配。
Emotion. 2020 Aug;20(5):890-903. doi: 10.1037/emo0000598. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
3
Unconscious Detection of One's Own Image.对自身形象的无意识检测。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Apr;30(4):471-480. doi: 10.1177/0956797618822971. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
4
Self-face Captures, Holds, and Biases Attention.自我面孔捕捉、吸引并偏向注意力。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 11;8:2371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02371. eCollection 2017.
5
Biphasic attentional orienting triggered by invisible social signals.双相注意定向由不可见的社会信号触发。
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:129-139. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
6
Potential reward reduces the adverse impact of negative distractor stimuli.潜在奖励减少了负面干扰刺激的不利影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Sep 1;12(9):1402-1413. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx067.
7
People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat.人们会看向他们所恐惧的物体:对发出威胁信号的刺激产生动眼捕捉。
Cogn Emot. 2017 Dec;31(8):1707-1714. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
8
Privileged access to awareness for faces and objects of expertise.对面部和专业领域物体的感知特权访问。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):788-98. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000188. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
9
Weighing the evidence for a dorsal processing bias under continuous flash suppression.权衡连续闪光抑制下背侧加工偏向的证据
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Sep;35:251-9. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.010. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
10
Own-race and own-age biases facilitate visual awareness of faces under interocular suppression.种族和年龄偏见有助于在眼间抑制下对面孔的视觉意识。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Aug 1;8:582. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00582. eCollection 2014.