Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, CIMeC, University of Trento Rovereto, Italy ; Department of Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin, Germany ; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin, Germany ; DFG Research Unit Person Perception, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena Jena, Germany ; Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Aug 1;8:582. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00582. eCollection 2014.
The detection of a face in a visual scene is the first stage in the face processing hierarchy. Although all subsequent, more elaborate face processing depends on the initial detection of a face, surprisingly little is known about the perceptual mechanisms underlying face detection. Recent evidence suggests that relatively hard-wired face detection mechanisms are broadly tuned to all face-like visual patterns as long as they respect the typical spatial configuration of the eyes above the mouth. Here, we qualify this notion by showing that face detection mechanisms are also sensitive to face shape and facial surface reflectance properties. We used continuous flash suppression (CFS) to render faces invisible at the beginning of a trial and measured the time upright and inverted faces needed to break into awareness. Young Caucasian adult observers were presented with faces from their own race or from another race (race experiment) and with faces from their own age group or from another age group (age experiment). Faces matching the observers' own race and age group were detected more quickly. Moreover, the advantage of upright over inverted faces in overcoming CFS, i.e., the face inversion effect (FIE), was larger for own-race and own-age faces. These results demonstrate that differences in face shape and surface reflectance influence access to awareness and configural face processing at the initial detection stage. Although we did not collect data from observers of another race or age group, these findings are a first indication that face detection mechanisms are shaped by visual experience with faces from one's own social group. Such experience-based fine-tuning of face detection mechanisms may equip in-group faces with a competitive advantage for access to conscious awareness.
在面部处理层级中,对面部的检测是第一阶段。尽管所有后续的、更精细的面部处理都依赖于对面部的初始检测,但人们对面部检测背后的感知机制却知之甚少。最近的证据表明,只要符合眼睛在嘴上方的典型空间配置,相对固定的面部检测机制就会广泛地适应所有类似面部的视觉模式。在这里,我们通过证明面部检测机制也对面部形状和面部表面反射特性敏感,从而对这一概念进行了限定。我们使用连续闪光抑制(CFS)在试验开始时使面部不可见,并测量了将正立和倒立的面部识别出来所需的时间。年轻的白种人成年观察者被呈现来自自己种族或其他种族的面孔(种族实验),以及来自自己年龄组或其他年龄组的面孔(年龄实验)。与观察者自己种族和年龄组匹配的面孔被更快地检测到。此外,在克服 CFS 方面,即面部反转效应(FIE),直立面孔相对于倒立面孔的优势更大,对于自己种族和自己年龄组的面孔来说更是如此。这些结果表明,面部形状和表面反射的差异会影响初始检测阶段的意识获取和面部整体处理。尽管我们没有从另一个种族或年龄组的观察者那里收集数据,但这些发现首次表明,面部检测机制是由来自自己社交群体的面部视觉经验塑造的。这种基于经验的对面部检测机制的微调可能使同组面孔在进入意识意识方面具有竞争优势。