Sanford Patrick A, Woolston Benjamin M
Northeastern University, Department of Chemical Engineering, 360 Huntington Avenue, 223 Cullinane, United States.
Northeastern University, Department of Chemical Engineering, 360 Huntington Avenue, 223 Cullinane, United States.
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2022 Apr;74:171-179. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
Single carbon (C1) substrates such as methanol are gaining increasing attention as cost-effective and environmentally friendly microbial feedstocks. Recent impressive metabolic engineering efforts to import C1 catabolic pathways into the non-methylotrophic bacterium Escherichia coli have led to synthetic strains growing on methanol as the sole carbon source. However, the growth rate and product yield in these strains remain inferior to native methylotrophs. Meanwhile, an ever-expanding genetic engineering toolbox is increasing the tractability of native C1 utilizers, raising the question of whether it is best to use an engineered strain or a native host for the microbial assimilation of C1 substrates. Here we provide perspective on this debate, using recent work in E. coli and the methylotrophic acetogen Eubacterium limosum as case studies.
甲醇等单碳(C1)底物作为经济高效且环境友好的微生物原料正受到越来越多的关注。最近,人们为将C1分解代谢途径导入非甲基营养型细菌大肠杆菌进行了令人瞩目的代谢工程研究,从而获得了能以甲醇作为唯一碳源生长的合成菌株。然而,这些菌株的生长速率和产物产量仍低于天然甲基营养菌。与此同时,不断扩展的基因工程工具箱提高了天然C1利用菌的可操作性,这就引发了一个问题:对于微生物同化C1底物而言,使用工程菌株还是天然宿主才是最佳选择。在此,我们以大肠杆菌和甲基营养型产乙酸菌黏液真杆菌的近期研究工作为案例,对这一争论发表看法。