Gresh Jared, Kisner Harold, DuChateau Brian
Compass Medical, East Bridgewater, MA, USA.
LumiraDx, Waltham, MA, USA.
Diagn Progn Res. 2021 Dec 24;5(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41512-021-00113-7.
Testing individuals suspected of severe acute respiratory syndrome-like coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is essential to reduce the spread of disease. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the false negativity rate of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test when utilized for testing individuals suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Concurrent swab samples were collected from patients suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection by their healthcare provider within two different urgent care centers located in Easton, MA, USA and East Bridgewater, MA, USA. One swab was tested using the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test. Negative results in patients considered at moderate to high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection were confirmed at a regional reference laboratory by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the additional swab sample. The data included in this study was collected retrospectively as an analysis of routine clinical practice.
From October 19, 2020 to January 3, 2021, a total of 2241 tests were performed using the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test, with 549 (24.5%) testing positive and 1692 (75.5%) testing negative. A subset (800) of the samples rendering a negative LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test was also tested using a PCR-based test for SARS-CoV-2. Of this subset, 770 (96.3%) tested negative, and 30 (3.8%) tested positive. Negative results obtained with the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag test demonstrated 96.3% agreement with PCR-based tests (CI 95%, 94.7-97.4%). A cycle threshold (C) was available for 17 of the 30 specimens that yielded discordant results, with an average C value of 31.2, an SD of 3.0, and a range of 25.2-36.3. C was > 30.0 in 11/17 specimens (64.7%).
This study demonstrates that the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test had a low false-negative rate of 3.8% when used in a community-based setting.
对疑似感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的个体进行检测对于减少疾病传播至关重要。这项回顾性研究的目的是确定LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2抗原检测用于检测疑似SARS-CoV-2感染个体时的假阴性率。
在美国马萨诸塞州伊斯顿和东布里奇沃特的两个不同紧急护理中心,由医疗服务提供者从疑似SARS-CoV-2感染的患者中同时采集拭子样本。一份拭子使用LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2抗原检测进行检测。对于被认为有中度至高度SARS-CoV-2感染风险的患者,其阴性结果在区域参考实验室通过使用额外的拭子样本进行聚合酶链反应(PCR)来确认。本研究纳入的数据是作为常规临床实践的分析进行回顾性收集的。
从2020年10月19日至2021年1月3日,共使用LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2抗原检测进行了2241次检测,其中549次(24.5%)检测呈阳性,1692次(75.5%)检测呈阴性。对LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2抗原检测呈阴性的样本子集(800份)也使用基于PCR的SARS-CoV-2检测进行了检测。在该子集中,770份(96.3%)检测呈阴性,30份(3.8%)检测呈阳性。LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2抗原检测获得的阴性结果与基于PCR的检测结果显示出96.3%的一致性(95%置信区间,94.7 - 97.4%)。在产生不一致结果的30个样本中有17个样本可获得循环阈值(C),其平均C值为31.2,标准差为3.0,范围为25.2 - 36.3。在11/17个样本(64.7%)中C > 30.0。
本研究表明,LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2抗原检测在社区环境中使用时假阴性率较低,为3.8%。