Jamiruddin Mohd Raeed, Meghla Bushra Ayat, Islam Dewan Zubaer, Tisha Taslima Akter, Khandker Shahad Saif, Khondoker Mohib Ullah, Haq Md Ahsanul, Adnan Nihad, Haque Mainul
Department of Pharmacy, BRAC University, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.
Department of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh.
Life (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;12(5):649. doi: 10.3390/life12050649.
With the progression of the COVID-19 pandemic, new technologies are being implemented for more rapid, scalable, and sensitive diagnostics. The implementation of microfluidic techniques and their amalgamation with different detection techniques has led to innovative diagnostics kits to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, antigens, and nucleic acids. In this review, we explore the different microfluidic-based diagnostics kits and how their amalgamation with the various detection techniques has spearheaded their availability throughout the world. Three other online databases, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, were referred for articles. One thousand one hundred sixty-four articles were determined with the search algorithm of microfluidics followed by diagnostics and SARS-CoV-2. We found that most of the materials used to produce microfluidics devices were the polymer materials such as PDMS, PMMA, and others. Centrifugal force is the most commonly used fluid manipulation technique, followed by electrochemical pumping, capillary action, and isotachophoresis. The implementation of the detection technique varied. In the case of antibody detection, spectrometer-based detection was most common, followed by fluorescence-based as well as colorimetry-based. In contrast, antigen detection implemented electrochemical-based detection followed by fluorescence-based detection, and spectrometer-based detection were most common. Finally, nucleic acid detection exclusively implements fluorescence-based detection with a few colorimetry-based detections. It has been further observed that the sensitivity and specificity of most devices varied with implementing the detection-based technique alongside the fluid manipulation technique. Most microfluidics devices are simple and incorporate the detection-based system within the device. This simplifies the deployment of such devices in a wide range of environments. They can play a significant role in increasing the rate of infection detection and facilitating better health services.
随着新冠疫情的发展,新技术正在被应用于更快速、可扩展且灵敏的诊断。微流控技术的应用及其与不同检测技术的融合,催生了用于检测新冠病毒抗体、抗原和核酸的创新诊断试剂盒。在本综述中,我们探讨了不同的基于微流控的诊断试剂盒,以及它们与各种检测技术的融合如何推动了其在全球的普及。另外还参考了三个在线数据库PubMed、ScienceDirect和谷歌学术来查找相关文章。通过微流控技术、诊断和新冠病毒的搜索算法,共确定了1164篇文章。我们发现,用于制造微流控设备的大多数材料是聚合物材料,如聚二甲基硅氧烷(PDMS)、聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)等。离心力是最常用的流体操控技术,其次是电化学泵、毛细管作用和等速电泳。检测技术的应用各不相同。在抗体检测方面,基于光谱仪的检测最为常见,其次是基于荧光和比色法的检测。相比之下,抗原检测采用基于电化学的检测,其次是基于荧光的检测,基于光谱仪的检测最为常见。最后,核酸检测仅采用基于荧光的检测,少数采用基于比色法的检测。进一步观察发现,大多数设备的灵敏度和特异性会随着流体操控技术以及基于检测的技术的应用而变化。大多数微流控设备结构简单,且在设备内部集成了基于检测的系统。这简化了此类设备在各种环境中的部署。它们在提高感染检测率和促进更好的医疗服务方面可以发挥重要作用。