Soto Perez Amanda Raquel, Eymann Alfredo, Ladenheim Roberta, Reboiras Fabiana, Durante Eduardo, Figari Marcelo
Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano (IUHI). Centro de Investigación en Educación para Profesionales de la Salud (CIEPS). Buenos Aires, Argentina..
Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano (IUHI). Centro de Investigación en Educación para Profesionales de la Salud (CIEPS). Buenos Aires, Argentina. .
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2021 Dec 28;78(4):353-358. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v78.n4.33144.
The COVID-19 pandemic limited in person presentation of final works and theses for the completion of specializations, masters and doctorates.
To describe the experience in remote presentations of summative essays and thesis.
A qualitative-quantitative cross-sectional study was carried out. Perceptions of graduates and examiner board members were explored through a questionnaire.
54 presentations were included: 53.7% specializations, 40.7% masters and 5.6% doctorates. The average audience number was 34 and distance to the university was 273.6 km. 116 professionals answered: graduates 28.4% and examiner board members 71.6%. They were female gender in 51.5% and 36.1%, respectively. 100% of graduates and 96.3% of examiner board members believed that they were able to present the results of the investigation, and only 3% and 7.3%, respectively, reported technical difficulties. Positive aspects identified by graduates were higher comfort (45.5%), and greater audience number (36.4%); while the examiner board members identified preventing transportation (37,8%) and taking advantage of technologies (35,4%). Graduates identified as negative aspects audience invisibility (33.3%), and potential threat of technical difficulties (27.3%); whilst the examiner board members identified none (31,7%), and potential threat of technical difficulties (20,7%).
Remote presentations were successful for graduates and examiner board members, and allowed to continue and finish academic postgraduate training.
新冠疫情限制了为完成专业课程、硕士学位和博士学位而进行的结业作品和论文的现场展示。
描述总结性论文和论文远程展示的经验。
开展了一项定性-定量的横断面研究。通过问卷调查探讨了毕业生和评审委员会成员的看法。
纳入了54次展示：53.7%为专业课程，40.7%为硕士学位，5.6%为博士学位。平均观众人数为34人，与大学的距离为273.6公里。116名专业人员作答：毕业生占28.4%，评审委员会成员占71.6%。他们的女性比例分别为51.5%和36.1%。100%的毕业生和96.3%的评审委员会成员认为他们能够展示调查结果，分别只有3%和7.3%的人报告了技术困难。毕业生指出的积极方面是舒适度更高（45.5%）和观众人数更多（36.4%）；而评审委员会成员指出的是避免交通问题（37.8%）和利用技术（35.4%）。毕业生认为的消极方面是观众不可见（33.3%）和技术困难的潜在威胁（27.3%）；而评审委员会成员认为没有消极方面的占31.7%，认为技术困难潜在威胁的占20.7%。
远程展示对毕业生和评审委员会成员来说是成功的，并使得学术研究生培训得以继续和完成。
