• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

存在衰弱风险的老年人的结局

Outcome of older adults at risk of frailty.

作者信息

Gunasekaran Venugopalan, Subramanian Manicka Saravanan, Singh Vishwajeet, Dey Aparajit Ballav

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi India.

Department of Geriatric Medicine Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research Puducherry India.

出版信息

Aging Med (Milton). 2021 Nov 12;4(4):266-271. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12181. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1002/agm2.12181
PMID:34964007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8711216/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The integral part of the definition of frailty is the outcome associated with it. Older adults at risk of frailty are in the process of becoming frail. This study looked at the clinical characteristics and outcomes of older adults at risk of frailty.

METHODOLOGY

The study population was selected from outpatient department of the geriatric medicine department in a tertiary care hospital. Older adults identified as at risk of frailty were assessed at baseline and then followed up after 1 year for the composite primary outcome of death, falls, hospitalization, and self-rated poor quality of life in the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The study included 324 older adults who had completed 1-year follow up. Mean (SD) age was 74.49 (4.58) years, and males were 241 (74.15%). Frail and pre-frail at baseline among the study population were 31.17% and 61.11%, respectively. The primary outcome occurred in 43 (13.27%) patients. Poor baseline IADL was significantly associated with primary outcome at the end of 1 year.

CONCLUSION

An unfavorable outcome in older adults at risk of frailty was significantly higher and independent of their baseline frailty status. Poor baseline IADL value may be considered as a predictor for primary outcome at 1 year of follow up.

摘要

背景

衰弱定义的核心部分是与之相关的结果。有衰弱风险的老年人正处于逐渐衰弱的过程中。本研究观察了有衰弱风险的老年人的临床特征和结果。

方法

研究人群选自一家三级医院老年医学科门诊。被确定为有衰弱风险的老年人在基线时接受评估,然后在1年后进行随访,观察随访期间死亡、跌倒、住院和自评生活质量差的综合主要结局。

结果

该研究纳入了324名完成1年随访的老年人。平均(标准差)年龄为74.49(4.58)岁,男性241人(74.15%)。研究人群中基线时衰弱和衰弱前期分别为31.17%和61.11%。43名(13.27%)患者出现了主要结局。基线时工具性日常生活活动能力差与1年末的主要结局显著相关。

结论

有衰弱风险的老年人不良结局显著更高,且独立于其基线衰弱状态。基线工具性日常生活活动能力差的值可被视为1年随访时主要结局的预测指标。

相似文献

1
Outcome of older adults at risk of frailty.存在衰弱风险的老年人的结局
Aging Med (Milton). 2021 Nov 12;4(4):266-271. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12181. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Frailty syndrome among older adults after hospitalization: A structural equation modeling analysis.老年人住院后衰弱综合征:结构方程模型分析。
Appl Nurs Res. 2022 Oct;67:151601. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151601. Epub 2022 May 30.
3
Predictive performance of 7 frailty instruments for short-term disability, falls and hospitalization among Chinese community-dwelling older adults: A prospective cohort study.7 种衰弱工具预测中国社区居住的老年人短期残疾、跌倒和住院的表现:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 May;117:103875. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103875. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
4
Changes in frailty status in a community-dwelling cohort of older adults: The VERISAÚDE study.社区居住的老年人队列中虚弱状况的变化:VERISAÚDE 研究。
Maturitas. 2019 Jan;119:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
5
Self-reported vision impairment and incident prefrailty and frailty in English community-dwelling older adults: findings from a 4-year follow-up study.自我报告的视力障碍与英国社区居住的老年人中衰弱前期和衰弱的发生:一项为期 4 年的随访研究结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Nov;71(11):1053-1058. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209207. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
6
CARE frailty e-health scale: Association with incident adverse health outcomes and comparison with the Cardiovascular Health Study frailty scale in the NuAge cohort.CARE 衰弱电子健康量表:与不良健康事件的关联及与 NuAge 队列中心血管健康研究衰弱量表的比较。
Maturitas. 2022 Aug;162:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Frailty Could Predict Death in Older Adults after Admissionat Emergency Department? A 6-month Prospective Study from a Middle-Income Country.衰弱能否预测老年患者入住急诊科后的死亡风险?来自中等收入国家的 6 个月前瞻性研究。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(7):641-647. doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1207-9.
8
Predictive validity of the Brazilian version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator for adverse health outcomes in older adults.巴西版蒂尔堡虚弱指标对老年人不良健康结局的预测效度。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 May-Jun;76:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
9
Quality of life and mortality in older adults with sepsis after one-year follow up: A prospective cohort study demonstrating the significant impact of frailty.在一年的随访后,脓毒症老年患者的生活质量和死亡率:一项前瞻性队列研究表明衰弱的显著影响。
Heart Lung. 2023 Jul-Aug;60:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
10
Association of Frailty and Malnutrition With Long-term Functional and Mortality Outcomes Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Results From the Singapore Longitudinal Aging Study 1.社区居住的老年人虚弱和营养不良与长期功能和死亡率的关系:来自新加坡纵向老龄化研究 1 的结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jul 6;1(3):e180650. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0650.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring frailty prevalence among adults in Indian healthcare settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.探索印度医疗机构中成年人的衰弱患病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Nov;13(11):4759-4774. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_484_24. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
2
Prevalence of frailty and association with patient centered outcomes: A prospective registry-embedded cohort study from India.衰弱的流行率及其与以患者为中心的结局的关系:来自印度的前瞻性登记嵌入队列研究。
J Crit Care. 2024 Apr;80:154509. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154509. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
3
Prevalence and Factors Associated with Impairment in Intrinsic Capacity among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Observational Study from South India.社区居住老年人内在能力受损的患病率及相关因素:一项来自印度南部的观察性研究。
Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2023 Apr 22;2023:4386415. doi: 10.1155/2023/4386415. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
How gait influences frailty models and health-related outcomes in clinical-based and population-based studies: a systematic review.步态如何影响基于临床和基于人群的研究中的虚弱模型和与健康相关的结局:系统评价。
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021 Apr;12(2):274-297. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12667. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
Frailty as a predictor of future falls and disability: a four-year follow-up study of Chinese older adults.衰弱作为未来跌倒和残疾的预测指标:一项对中国老年人的四年随访研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 6;20(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01798-z.
3
Frailty Assessment in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparison of 3 Diagnostic Instruments.社区居住的老年人衰弱评估:3 种诊断工具的比较。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(6):582-590. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1396-2.
4
Identification of Frailty and Its Risk Factors in Elderly Hospitalized Patients from Different Wards: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.从不同病房识别老年住院患者的脆弱性及其危险因素:中国的一项横断面研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Dec 19;14:2249-2259. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S225149. eCollection 2019.
5
Socioeconomic status scales-modified Kuppuswamy and Udai Pareekh's scale updated for 2019.社会经济地位量表——2019年更新的改良库普苏瓦米和乌代·帕雷克量表。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jun;8(6):1846-1849. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_288_19.
6
What is polypharmacy? A systematic review of definitions.什么是多重用药?定义的系统综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0621-2.
7
The Asia-Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Frailty.《亚太地区衰弱管理临床实践指南》。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):564-575. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.018.
8
Association between physiological falls risk and physical performance tests among community-dwelling older adults.社区居住的老年人生理跌倒风险与身体机能测试之间的关联。
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Aug 13;10:1319-26. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S79398. eCollection 2015.
9
The Prediction of ADL and IADL Disability Using Six Physical Indicators of Frailty: A Longitudinal Study in the Netherlands.使用六种身体衰弱指标预测日常生活活动能力和工具性日常生活活动能力障碍:荷兰的一项纵向研究。
Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2014;2014:358137. doi: 10.1155/2014/358137. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
10
Frailty consensus: a call to action.衰弱共识:行动呼吁。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022.