Ringwald Whitney R, Wright Aidan G C
Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA.
Eur J Pers. 2021 Mar;35(2):197-211. doi: 10.1002/per.2286. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
Empathy theoretically serves an affiliative interpersonal function by satisfying motives for intimacy and union with others. Accordingly, empathy is expected to vary depending on the situation. Inconsistent empirical support for empathy's affiliative role may be because of methodology focused on individual differences in empathy or differences between controlled experimental conditions, which fail to capture its dynamic and interpersonal nature. To address these shortcomings, we used ecological momentary assessment to establish typical patterns of empathy across everyday interactions. Associations among empathy, affect, and interpersonal behaviour of self and interaction partner were examined in a student sample (N = 330), then replicated in a preregistered community sample (N = 279). Multilevel structural equation modelling was used to distinguish individual differences in empathy from interaction-level effects. Results show that people are more empathetic during positively valenced interactions with others perceived as warm and when expressing warmth. By confirming the typically affiliative role of empathy, existing research to the contrary can be best understood as exceptions to the norm.
从理论上讲,共情通过满足与他人亲密和联结的动机,发挥一种亲和的人际功能。因此,共情预期会因情境而异。对共情的亲和角色的实证支持不一致,可能是由于研究方法侧重于共情的个体差异或受控实验条件之间的差异,而这些方法未能捕捉到共情的动态和人际本质。为了解决这些不足,我们采用生态瞬时评估来确定日常互动中典型的共情模式。在一个学生样本(N = 330)中检验了共情、情感以及自我和互动伙伴的人际行为之间的关联,然后在一个预先注册的社区样本(N = 279)中进行了重复验证。使用多层结构方程模型来区分共情的个体差异和互动层面的效应。结果表明,当与被视为热情的他人进行正性情绪互动以及表达热情时,人们会更具共情力。通过确认共情典型的亲和角色,现有相反的研究可以最好地理解为常态的例外情况。