• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于世界卫生组织全球专家共识研究的促进健康老龄化的推荐长期护理服务包。

A Recommended Package of Long-Term Care Services to Promote Healthy Ageing Based on a WHO Global Expert Consensus Study.

机构信息

Ageing and Health Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child & Adolescent Health and Ageing, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland; Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Ageing and Health Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child & Adolescent Health and Ageing, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland; Global Observatory for Palliative Care Institute for Culture and Society University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Feb;23(2):297-303.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.019. Epub 2021 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.019
PMID:34973958
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To reach consensus on a minimum list of long-term care (LTC) interventions to be included in a service package delivered through universal health coverage (UHC).

DESIGN

A multistep expert consensus process.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Multinational and multidisciplinary experts in LTC and ageing.

METHODS

The consensus process was composed of 3 stages: (1) a preconsultation round that built on an initial list of LTC interventions generated by a previous scoping review; (2) 2-round surveys to reach consensus on important, acceptable, and feasible interventions for LTC; (3) a panel meeting to finalize the consensus.

RESULTS

The preconsultation round generated an initial list of 117 interventions. In round 1, 194 experts were contacted and 92 (47%) completed the survey. In round 2, the same experts contacted for round 1 were invited, and 115 (59%) completed the survey. Of the 115 respondents in round 2, 80 participated in round 1. Experts representing various disciplines (eg, geriatricians, family doctors, nurses, mental health, and rehabilitation professionals) participated in round 2, representing 42 countries. In round 1, 81 interventions achieved the predetermined threshold for importance, and in round 2, 41 interventions achieved the predetermined threshold for acceptability and feasibility. Nine conflicting interventions between rounds 1 and 2 were discussed in the panel meeting. The recommended list composed of 50 interventions were from 6 domains: unpaid and paid carers' support and training, person-centered assessment and care planning, prevention and management of intrinsic capacity decline, optimization of functional ability, interventions needing focused attention, and palliative care.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

An international discussion and consensus process generated a minimum list of LTC interventions to be included in a service package for UHC. This package will enable actions toward a more robust framework for integrated services for older people in need of LTC across the continuum of care.

摘要

目的

就长期护理(LTC)干预措施达成共识,这些干预措施将纳入通过全民健康覆盖(UHC)提供的服务包中。

设计

多步骤专家共识过程。

设置和参与者

LTC 和老龄化方面的多国和多学科专家。

方法

共识过程由 3 个阶段组成:(1)预咨询轮次,该轮次基于之前的范围审查生成的初步 LTC 干预措施清单;(2)2 轮调查,以就 LTC 的重要、可接受和可行干预措施达成共识;(3)小组会议以敲定共识。

结果

预咨询轮次生成了 117 项干预措施的初始清单。在第 1 轮中,联系了 194 名专家,其中 92 名(47%)完成了调查。在第 2 轮中,邀请了参加第 1 轮的相同专家,其中 115 名(59%)完成了调查。在第 2 轮的 115 名受访者中,有 80 名参加了第 1 轮。来自不同学科(如老年病学家、家庭医生、护士、心理健康和康复专业人员)的专家参加了第 2 轮,代表了 42 个国家。在第 1 轮中,有 81 项干预措施达到了重要性的预定阈值,在第 2 轮中,有 41 项干预措施达到了可接受性和可行性的预定阈值。在第 1 轮和第 2 轮之间有 9 项存在冲突的干预措施在小组会议上进行了讨论。推荐的由 50 项干预措施组成的清单来自 6 个领域:无偿和有偿护理人员的支持和培训、以人为本的评估和护理计划、内在能力下降的预防和管理、功能能力的优化、需要重点关注的干预措施以及姑息治疗。

结论和意义

国际讨论和共识过程产生了 LTC 干预措施的最低清单,这些干预措施将纳入 UHC 的服务包中。该服务包将为在整个护理连续体上为需要长期护理的老年人提供更强大的综合服务框架的行动奠定基础。

相似文献

1
A Recommended Package of Long-Term Care Services to Promote Healthy Ageing Based on a WHO Global Expert Consensus Study.基于世界卫生组织全球专家共识研究的促进健康老龄化的推荐长期护理服务包。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Feb;23(2):297-303.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.019. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
2
Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life.多学科支持的长期护理临终关怀:改善临终关怀的综合方法。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 22;21(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02271-1.
3
Developing a Fracture Risk Clinical Assessment Protocol for Long-Term Care: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process.制定长期护理骨折风险临床评估方案:改良德尔菲共识过程。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Aug;22(8):1726-1734.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
4
Establishing primary care physician commitment in Canadian long-term care homes: a protocol for a modified e-Delphi study.在加拿大长期护理院中确立初级保健医生的参与度:一项改良电子德尔菲研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 7;15(2):e093277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093277.
5
Actions required to implement integrated care for older people in the community using the World Health Organization's ICOPE approach: A global Delphi consensus study.实施世界卫生组织 ICOPE 方法的社区老年人综合护理所需的行动:全球德尔菲共识研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205533. eCollection 2018.
6
Development of a minimum dataset for subacute rehabilitation: a three-round e-Delphi consensus study.制定亚急性康复最低数据集:三轮电子德尔菲共识研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 25;12(3):e058725. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058725.
7
eStablish And Formalize Expert Criteria for Avoidable Resuscitation Review (SAFECARR) Electronic Delphi: Development of a Consensus Framework for Classifying and Reviewing Cardiac Arrests Within the PICU.建立并规范可避免复苏审查(SAFECARR)电子德尔菲专家标准:制定用于对儿科重症监护病房(PICU)内心脏骤停进行分类和审查的共识框架。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;21(11):992-999. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002488.
8
Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study.支持 ICU 中生命维持治疗决策过程的框架:德尔菲研究的结果。
Crit Care Med. 2020 May;48(5):645-653. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004221.
9
Development of a long-term care service integration self-assessment tool.长期护理服务整合自我评估工具的开发。
J Interprof Care. 2024 Sep-Oct;38(5):807-817. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2024.2375633. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
10
Developing a Consensus for Adolescent and Young Adult mHealth HIV Prevention Interventions in the United States: A Delphi Method Study.在美国制定青少年和青年移动健康HIV预防干预措施的共识:一项德尔菲法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 12;6(7):e25982. doi: 10.2196/25982.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship-Centered Care for Older Adults in Long-Term Care Homes: A Scoping Review.长期护理机构中以关系为中心的老年人护理:一项范围综述
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Sep;44(9):1513-1532. doi: 10.1177/07334648241309761. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
2
Patient Profile and Cost Savings of Long-Term Care in a Spanish Hospital: Retrospective Observational Study.西班牙一家医院长期护理的患者概况与成本节约:回顾性观察研究
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Nov 19;13:e64248. doi: 10.2196/64248.
3
Psychometric properties of the Fraboni scale of ageism (FSA) applied to long-term caregivers in nursing homes.
老龄化歧视量表(FSA)在养老院长期护理者中的心理测量学特性。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05229-1.
4
Professional attractiveness among long-term care workers in nursing homes in China: a cross-sectional study.中国养老院长期护理人员的职业吸引力:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 29;24(1):548. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11023-x.
5
Intrinsic Capacities, Functional Ability, Physiological Systems, and Caregiver Support: A Targeted Synthesis of Effective Interventions and International Recommendations for Older Adults.内在能力、功能能力、生理系统和护理人员支持:针对老年人的有效干预措施和国际建议的针对性综合。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 1;20(5):4382. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054382.
6
Interventions to Increase Patient Safety in Long-Term Care Facilities-Umbrella Review.提高长期护理设施患者安全性的干预措施——伞式综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;19(22):15354. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215354.
7
Caring for Older People during and beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experiences of Residential Health Care Workers.在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后照顾老年人:住宅医疗保健工作者的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 19;19(22):15287. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215287.
8
Recommendations for Medical and Mental Health Care in Assisted Living Based on an Expert Delphi Consensus Panel: A Consensus Statement.基于专家德尔菲共识小组的辅助生活医疗和精神保健建议:共识声明。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233872. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33872.