Solberg Runar Barstad, Steene-Johannessen Jostein, Wang Fagerland Morten, Anderssen Sigmund A, Berntsen Sveinung, Resaland Geir K, van Sluijs Esther M F, Ekelund Ulf, Kolle Elin
Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, PB 4014, Ullevål Stadion, 0806 Oslo, Norway.
Faculty of Health and Sport Science, Department of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, PB 422, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway.
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Nov 24;24:101648. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101648. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Little information exists on the mechanism of how physical activity interventions effects academic performance. We examined whether the effects of a school-based physical activity intervention on academic performance were mediated by aerobic fitness. The School in Motion study was a nine-month cluster randomized controlled trial between September 2017 and June 2018. Students from 30 Norwegian lower secondary schools ( = 2,084, mean age [] = 14 [0.3] years) were randomly assigned into three groups: the Physically Active Learning (PAL) intervention ( = 10), the Don't Worry-Be Happy (DWBH) intervention ( = 10), or control ( = 10). Aerobic fitness was assessed by the Andersen test and academic performance by national tests in reading and numeracy. Mediation was assessed according to the causal steps approach using linear mixed models. In the PAL intervention, aerobic fitness partially mediated the intervention effect on numeracy by 28% from a total effect of 1.73 points (95% CI: 1.13 to 2.33) to a natural direct effect of 1.24 points (95% CI: 0.58 to 1.91), and fully mediated the intervention effect on reading, with the total effect of 0.89 points (95% CI: 0.15 to 1.62) reduced to the natural direct effect of 0.40 points (95% CI: -0.48 to 1.28). Aerobic fitness did not mediate the effects on academic performance in the DWBH intervention. As aerobic fitness mediated the intervention effect on academic performance in one intervention, physical activity of an intensity that increases aerobic fitness is one strategy to improve academic performance among adolescents.
关于体育活动干预影响学业成绩的机制,目前所知甚少。我们研究了以学校为基础的体育活动干预对学业成绩的影响是否通过有氧适能来介导。“运动中的学校”研究是一项在2017年9月至2018年6月期间进行的为期九个月的整群随机对照试验。来自30所挪威初中的学生(n = 2084,平均年龄[M] = 14[0.3]岁)被随机分为三组:体育活动学习(PAL)干预组(n = 10)、“别担心,要快乐”(DWBH)干预组(n = 10)或对照组(n = 10)。通过安徒生测试评估有氧适能,通过国家阅读和算术测试评估学业成绩。使用线性混合模型根据因果步骤法评估中介作用。在PAL干预中,有氧适能部分介导了干预对算术的影响,从总效应1.73分(95%CI:1.13至2.33)降至自然直接效应1.24分(95%CI:0.58至1.91),介导比例为28%,并且完全介导了干预对阅读的影响,总效应0.89分(95%CI:0.15至1.62)降至自然直接效应0.40分(95%CI:-0.48至1.28)。有氧适能在DWBH干预中并未介导对学业成绩的影响。由于有氧适能在一种干预中介导了对学业成绩的干预效应,因此增加有氧适能的强度的体育活动是提高青少年学业成绩的一种策略。