Suppr超能文献

抗DNA抗体的检测:使用五种不同方法的重新评估。

Measurement of anti-DNA antibodies: a reappraisal using five different methods.

作者信息

Isenberg D A, Dudeney C, Williams W, Addison I, Charles S, Clarke J, Todd-Pokropek A

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 1987 Jun;46(6):448-56. doi: 10.1136/ard.46.6.448.

Abstract

One hundred and thirty coded sera, 60 from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and 70 from patients with other autoimmune rheumatic diseases were tested for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) binding activity by five different types of assay. These were enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (distinguishing IgG and IgM anti-ssDNA and anti-dsDNA), Crithidia luciliae, a nitrocellulose filter assay, the Amersham kit, and another modified Farr assay, the radioimmunoassay (RIA) (UK). The Crithidia test was the most specific, none of the controls was positive, but the least sensitive (13% positive only). The RIA (UK) was the most sensitive (57% positive). In most of the assays 3-9% of the controls were positive. When the SLE sera were analysed according to disease activity the IgG anti-dsDNA ELISA, all three RIA values, and the Crithidia test values were raised in all the patients with severely active disease. Some patients with inactive disease, however, were positive in each of the tests. The best interassay correlations (r less than 0.49) were found between RIA (UK), and ss IgG and the Amersham kit; and between ds IgG and ss IgG. In the main, however, it was clear that different assays are dependent upon distinctive properties of DNA antibodies. It seems inevitable that most major rheumatology units will require more than one anti-DNA antibody assay.

摘要

采用五种不同的检测方法,对130份编码血清进行了脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)结合活性检测,其中60份来自系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者,70份来自其他自身免疫性风湿性疾病患者。这些方法包括酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)(区分IgG和IgM抗单链DNA和抗双链DNA)、利什曼原虫检测、硝酸纤维素滤膜检测、安玛西亚试剂盒以及另一种改良的法尔检测法——放射免疫测定(RIA)(英国)。利什曼原虫检测特异性最强,所有对照均为阴性,但灵敏度最低(仅13%呈阳性)。RIA(英国)灵敏度最高(57%呈阳性)。在大多数检测中,3% - 9%的对照呈阳性。根据疾病活动度对SLE血清进行分析时,所有病情严重活动的患者,其IgG抗双链DNA ELISA、所有三种RIA值以及利什曼原虫检测值均升高。然而,一些病情不活动的患者在每项检测中也呈阳性。RIA(英国)与单链IgG以及安玛西亚试剂盒之间;双链IgG与单链IgG之间的检测相关性最佳(r小于0.49)。然而,总体而言,很明显不同的检测方法依赖于DNA抗体的不同特性。大多数主要的风湿病科似乎不可避免地需要不止一种抗DNA抗体检测方法。

相似文献

2
Anti-DNA antibodies: the choice of assays for routine diagnostic work.抗DNA抗体:常规诊断工作中检测方法的选择
Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand C. 1985 Feb;93(1):13-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1985.tb02915.x.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Complement fixation with cell nuclei and DNA in lupus erythematosus.红斑狼疮中细胞核及DNA的补体结合
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1957 Dec;96(3):575-9. doi: 10.3181/00379727-96-23545.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验