Cheon Jeong Eun, Nam Yeseul, Kim Kaylyn J, Lee Hae In, Park Haeyoung Gideon, Kim Young-Hoon
Social and Cultural Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Social Cognition and Intergroup Perception Lab, Department of Psychology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 20;12:754265. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754265. eCollection 2021.
An intriguing phenomenon that arises from decision making is that the decision maker's choice is often influenced by whether the option is presented in a positive or negative frame, even though the options are, , identical to one another. Yet, the impact of such differential framing of equivalent information, referred to as the attribute framing effect, may not be the same for every culture; rather, some cultures may be more readily influenced by the differentially valenced frames than others (i.e., showing a greater difference in evaluation in a positive vs. negative frame). The present study investigates to what extent and why cultures may differ in their sensitivity to the attribute framing effect. Participants were recruited from South Korea and the United States, cultures characterized by their focus on prevention and promotion, respectively, to test for the cultural variability in the attribute framing effect. The results revealed that Korean participants were markedly more influenced by the valence of the frame than North American participants. Regulatory focus explained why Koreas showed a greater sensitivity toward the attribute framing effect than North Americans. Specifically, a greater prevention (vs. promotion) orientation of Korean participants led them to show a greater evaluation gap in the positive and negative frames. Implications for cultural significance on the attribute framing effect are discussed.
决策过程中出现的一个有趣现象是,决策者的选择往往会受到选项呈现方式是积极还是消极框架的影响,即便这些选项本身是完全相同的。然而,这种对等效信息的不同框架呈现所产生的影响,即所谓的属性框架效应,在不同文化中可能并不相同;具体而言,某些文化可能比其他文化更容易受到不同效价框架的影响(也就是说,在积极框架和消极框架下的评价差异更大)。本研究探讨了不同文化在对属性框架效应的敏感性方面存在何种程度的差异以及原因。研究参与者分别来自韩国和美国,这两种文化分别以注重预防和促进为特点,以此来测试属性框架效应中的文化变异性。结果显示,韩国参与者比北美参与者更容易受到框架效价的影响。调节焦点解释了为什么韩国人比北美人对属性框架效应更为敏感。具体来说,韩国参与者更强的预防(而非促进)导向使他们在积极和消极框架下表现出更大的评价差距。文中还讨论了属性框架效应的文化意义。