Suppr超能文献

高强度间歇训练与持续训练交替进行,对改善肥胖中年男性的心脏代谢健康有效。

Alternating high-intensity interval training and continuous training is efficacious in improving cardiometabolic health in obese middle-aged men.

作者信息

Poon Eric Tsz-Chun, Siu Parco Ming-Fai, Wongpipit Waris, Gibala Martin, Wong Stephen Heung-Sang

机构信息

Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.

Division of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.

出版信息

J Exerc Sci Fit. 2022 Jan;20(1):40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) or moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) alone has been shown to improve metabolic health, but the effects of alternating the two training approaches as often practiced in real life remained unclear.

PURPOSE

To examine the effects of HIIT or MICT alone or alternating HIIT-MICT on cardiometabolic responses in inactive obese middle-aged men.

METHODS

Forty-two participants (age: 42 ± 5 y; BMI: 26.3 ± 2.1 kg m) were randomly assigned to four groups: HIIT (12 x 1-min running bouts at 80-90% HR interspersed with 1-min active recovery at 50% HR), MICT (40-min brisk walk at 65-70% HR), alternating HIIT-MICT or a non-exercise control group (CON). Exercise sessions were conducted three times per week for 16 weeks. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO), body composition (by bioelectrical impedance analysis), blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and lipid profile were assessed at baseline and after the 16-week intervention. Enjoyment and self-efficacy were also assessed at the end of intervention.

RESULTS

All exercise groups showed a similar VO increase of ∼15% (HIIT: 34.3 ± 4.4 vs 39.1 ± 5.4; MICT: 34.9 ± 5.0 vs 39.4 ± 7.2; and alternating HIIT-MICT: 34.4 ± 5.0 vs 40.3 ± 4.6 mL kgmin) compared to baseline and CON (all p < 0.05). Weight, BMI, % fat and waist circumference also showed similar reductions in all exercise groups compared to baseline and CON (all p < 0.05). No significant group difference was observed for all blood markers. Compared to baseline, total cholesterol decreased after HIIT-MICT, while HIIT significantly decreased fasting insulin level and improved insulin resistance (p < 0.05). Enjoyment, self-efficacy and adherence were similar among all exercise groups.

CONCLUSION

HIIT or MICT alone or alternating HIIT-MICT similarly improve cardiovascular fitness and body composition in obese middle-aged men despite differences in total training volume and time commitment.

摘要

背景

高强度间歇训练(HIIT)或中等强度持续训练(MICT)单独进行已被证明可改善代谢健康,但在现实生活中经常交替使用这两种训练方法的效果仍不清楚。

目的

研究单独进行HIIT或MICT,或交替进行HIIT-MICT对缺乏运动的肥胖中年男性心脏代谢反应的影响。

方法

42名参与者(年龄:42±5岁;BMI:26.3±2.1kg/m²)被随机分为四组:HIIT组(以80%-90%心率进行12次1分钟跑步,穿插以50%心率进行1分钟主动恢复)、MICT组(以65%-70%心率进行40分钟快走)、交替HIIT-MICT组或非运动对照组(CON)。运动训练每周进行3次,共16周。在基线和16周干预后评估最大摄氧量(VO₂)、身体成分(通过生物电阻抗分析)、血压、空腹血糖、胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)和血脂谱。在干预结束时还评估了运动乐趣和自我效能感。

结果

与基线和CON组相比,所有运动组的VO₂均有相似的约15%的增加(HIIT组:34.3±4.4 vs 39.1±5.4;MICT组:34.9±5.0 vs 39.4±7.2;交替HIIT-MICT组:34.4±5.0 vs 40.3±4.6 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)(所有p<0.05)。与基线和CON组相比,所有运动组的体重、BMI、体脂百分比和腰围也有相似的下降(所有p<0.05)。所有血液指标在各组间未观察到显著差异。与基线相比,HIIT-MICT后总胆固醇下降,而HIIT显著降低空腹胰岛素水平并改善胰岛素抵抗(p<0.05)。所有运动组的运动乐趣、自我效能感和依从性相似。

结论

尽管总训练量和时间投入不同,但单独进行HIIT或MICT,或交替进行HIIT-MICT均可同样改善肥胖中年男性的心血管健康和身体成分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5a/8689221/480ad271a300/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验