Suppr超能文献

2020 年 6 月至 10 月,在荷兰阿姆斯特丹,对生活在那里的六个族群进行了一项基于人群的横断面研究,以评估 SARS-CoV-2 抗体流行率和相关因素。

SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence and correlates of six ethnic groups living in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: a population-based cross-sectional study, June-October 2020.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity (AII), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):e052752. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052752.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

It has been suggested that ethnic minorities have been disproportionally affected by the COVID-19. We aimed to determine whether prevalence and correlates of past SARS-CoV-2 exposure varied between six ethnic groups in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Participants aged 25-79 years enrolled in the Healthy Life in an Urban Setting population-based prospective cohort (n=16 889) were randomly selected within ethnic groups and invited to participate in a cross-sectional COVID-19 seroprevalence substudy.

OUTCOME MEASURES

We tested participants for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and collected information on SARS-CoV-2 exposures. We estimated prevalence and correlates of SARS-CoV-2 exposure within ethnic groups using survey-weighted logistic regression adjusting for age, sex and calendar time.

RESULTS

Between 24 June and 9 October 2020, we included 2497 participants. Adjusted SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was comparable between ethnic Dutch (24/498; 5.1%, 95% CI 2.8% to 7.4%), South-Asian Surinamese (22/451; 4.9%, 95% CI 2.2% to 7.7%), African Surinamese (22/400; 8.3%, 95% CI 3.1% to 13.6%), Turkish (30/408; 7.9%, 95% CI 4.4% to 11.4%) and Moroccan (32/391; 7.2%, 95% CI 4.2% to 10.1%) participants, but higher among Ghanaians (95/327; 26.3%, 95% CI 18.5% to 34.0%). 57.1% of SARS-CoV-2-positive participants did not suspect or were unsure of being infected, which was lowest in African Surinamese (18.2%) and highest in Ghanaians (90.5%). Correlates of SARS-CoV-2 exposure varied across ethnic groups, while the most common correlate was having a household member suspected of infection. In Ghanaians, seropositivity was associated with older age, larger household sizes, living with small children, leaving home to work and attending religious services.

CONCLUSIONS

No remarkable differences in SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence were observed between the largest ethnic groups in Amsterdam after the first wave of infections. The higher infection seroprevalence observed among Ghanaians, which passed mostly unnoticed, warrants wider prevention efforts and opportunities for non-symptom-based testing.

摘要

目的

有人认为少数民族受 COVID-19 的影响不成比例。我们旨在确定在荷兰阿姆斯特丹的六个族裔群体中,过去 SARS-CoV-2 暴露的患病率和相关因素是否存在差异。

设计、地点、参与者:在 25-79 岁的人群中,参与者参加了一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究——健康生活在城市环境中(n=16889),并在族裔群体内随机选择并邀请他们参加 COVID-19 血清流行率的横断面研究。

结果

2020 年 6 月 24 日至 10 月 9 日期间,我们纳入了 2497 名参与者。使用调查加权逻辑回归,根据年龄、性别和日历时间调整 SARS-CoV-2 暴露的患病率和相关因素。在调整了年龄、性别和日历时间后,荷兰裔(24/498;5.1%,95%CI 2.8%至 7.4%)、南亚苏里南人(22/451;4.9%,95%CI 2.2%至 7.7%)、非洲苏里南人(22/400;8.3%,95%CI 3.1%至 13.6%)、土耳其人(30/408;7.9%,95%CI 4.4%至 11.4%)和摩洛哥人(32/391;7.2%,95%CI 4.2%至 10.1%)参与者的调整后 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性率相当,但加纳人的血清阳性率更高(95/327;26.3%,95%CI 18.5%至 34.0%)。57.1%的 SARS-CoV-2 阳性参与者怀疑或不确定自己被感染,其中非洲苏里南人最低(18.2%),加纳人最高(90.5%)。SARS-CoV-2 暴露的相关因素在不同族裔群体中有所不同,而最常见的相关因素是有家庭成员疑似感染。在加纳人中,血清阳性与年龄较大、家庭规模较大、与幼儿同住、离家工作和参加宗教服务有关。

结论

在第一波感染后,在阿姆斯特丹最大的族裔群体中,SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性率没有明显差异。在加纳人(90.5%)中观察到的更高的感染血清阳性率,大部分人没有注意到,这需要更广泛的预防措施和非症状为基础的检测机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df36/8739540/a1b0f5206a59/bmjopen-2021-052752f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验