Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, LYMMCARE (Lymphoma and Myeloma Center, Amsterdam), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Nucl Med. 2022 Sep;63(9):1424-1430. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263067. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
Consensus about a standard segmentation method to derive metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is lacking, and it is unknown how different segmentation methods influence quantitative PET features. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the delineation and completeness of lesion selection and the need for manual adaptation with different segmentation methods, and to assess the influence of segmentation methods on the prognostic value of MTV, intensity, and dissemination radiomics features in cHL patients. We analyzed a total of 105 F-FDG PET/CT scans from patients with newly diagnosed ( = 35) and relapsed/refractory ( = 70) cHL with 6 segmentation methods: 2 fixed thresholds on SUV4.0 and SUV2.5, 2 relative methods of 41% of SUV (41max) and a contrast-corrected 50% of SUV (A50P), and 2 combination majority vote (MV) methods (MV2, MV3). Segmentation quality was assessed by 2 reviewers on the basis of predefined quality criteria: completeness of selection, the need for manual adaptation, and delineation of lesion borders. Correlations and prognostic performance of resulting radiomics features were compared among the methods. SUV4.0 required the least manual adaptation but tended to underestimate MTV and often missed small lesions with low F-FDG uptake. SUV2.5 most frequently included all lesions but required minor manual adaptations and generally overestimated MTV. In contrast, few lesions were missed when using 41max, A50P, MV2, and MV3, but these segmentation methods required extensive manual adaptation and overestimated MTV in most cases. MTV and dissemination features significantly differed among the methods. However, correlations among methods were high for MTV and most intensity and dissemination features. There were no significant differences in prognostic performance for all features among the methods. A high correlation existed between MTV, intensity, and most dissemination features derived with the different segmentation methods, and the prognostic performance is similar. Despite frequently missing small lesions with low F-FDG avidity, segmentation with a fixed threshold of SUV4.0 required the least manual adaptation, which is critical for future research and implementation in clinical practice. However, the importance of small, low F-FDG-avidity lesions should be addressed in a larger cohort of cHL patients.
对于经典霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)的标准分割方法,尚未达成共识,也不清楚不同的分割方法如何影响定量 PET 特征。因此,我们旨在评估不同分割方法在病变选择的描绘和完整性以及手动适应的需求,并评估分割方法对 cHL 患者 MTV、强度和扩散放射组学特征预后价值的影响。我们分析了 105 例初诊(n=35)和复发/难治性(n=70)cHL 患者的 F-FDG PET/CT 扫描,使用了 6 种分割方法:SUV4.0 和 SUV2.5 的 2 个固定阈值、41%的 SUV(41max)和校正后的 50%的 SUV(A50P)的 2 个相对方法,以及 2 个组合多数投票(MV)方法(MV2 和 MV3)。2 位审阅者根据预设的质量标准评估分割质量:选择的完整性、手动适应的需求以及病变边界的描绘。比较了方法之间的放射组学特征的相关性和预后性能。SUV4.0 需要最少的手动调整,但往往低估 MTV,并且经常错过 F-FDG 摄取量低的小病变。SUV2.5 最常包括所有病变,但需要较小的手动调整,通常高估 MTV。相比之下,当使用 41max、A50P、MV2 和 MV3 时,很少错过病变,但这些分割方法在大多数情况下需要广泛的手动调整并高估 MTV。MTV 和扩散特征在方法之间存在显著差异。然而,MTV 和大多数强度和扩散特征的方法之间的相关性很高。在方法之间,所有特征的预后性能均无显著差异。不同分割方法得出的 MTV、强度和大多数扩散特征之间存在高度相关性,且预后性能相似。尽管经常错过 F-FDG 摄取量低的小病变,但 SUV4.0 的固定阈值分割需要最少的手动调整,这对于未来的研究和临床实践中的实施至关重要。然而,应该在更大的 cHL 患者队列中解决小的、低 F-FDG 摄取量病变的重要性。